Case law

Victoria Pichkurova v. Los Angeles Asylum Office, USCIS

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 14, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 14 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 15 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 5 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 6 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate

Jonathan Chicas v. Amazon Retail LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 11, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualify for 15 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 16 by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 27 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 28 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Christopher V. Markarian v. San Bernardino County Sheriff Dept.

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 23, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the material on 6 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 7 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 8 … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 18 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 19 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Danine Dean v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 28, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 6 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 7 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 17 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 18 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Cuauhtemoc Lugo v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 28, 2024

If only a portion 10 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 11 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 12 in the margins … If only a 22 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 23 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 24 markings in the margins

In re NJOY, Inc. Consumer Class Action Litigation

120 F. Supp. 3d 1050 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 14, 2015

“A witness can qualify as an expert through practical experience in a particular field, not just through academic training.” Rogers v. … To be typical, a class representative need not prove that she is immune from any possible defense, or that her claim will fail only if every other class member’s claim also fails.

American Petroleum Institute v. Knecht

456 F. Supp. 889 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 31, 1978

We must look at the decision not as the chemist, biologist or statistician that we are qualified neither by training nor experience to be, but as a reviewing court exercising our narrowly defined duty of holding agencies … The agency’s construction should not be overruled unless clearly wrong. American Trucking Association, Inc. v. U. S., 425 F.Supp. 903, 907 (D.D.C.), aff’d, 425 U.S. 955 , 96 S.Ct. 1735 , 48 L.Ed.2d 201 (1975).

Hunter Ex Rel. Brandt v. Regents of the University of California

971 F. Supp. 1316 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 20, 1997

On July 25, 1996, the Court ruled that Dean Mitchell is entitled to the defense of qualified immunity to Plaintiffs claim for damages. See Order Re: Def. Theodore Mitchell’s Mot’n for Summ. … The Court granted the Regents’ motion for judgment on the pleadings as to Plaintiff’s first and third claims for relief on the grounds of Eleventh Amendment immunity.

Herbert O Allen Jr. v. Marin Contreras

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 5, 2025

If only a 12 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 13 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 14 in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 9 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 10 without prior privilege review.

Cherise Marie Walton v. County of Riverside

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 6, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 17 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 18 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 4 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without 5 prior privilege review.

Frank Villaran v. County of San Bernardino

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 23, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 27 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 28 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 10 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 11 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in 12 the margins

Gamaliel Ayon Nunez; Maria Cristina Lozoya Melendez; Isak Francisco Rodriguez Lozoya; Cristian Isais Rodriguez Lozoya; Ivan Damian Rodriguez Lozoya v. County of Riverside; Deputy R. Gale; and Does 1-20, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 6, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 28 /// 1 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the … This provision is not intended to modify 27 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 28 production without prior privilege review.

Arthur Broughton v. FCA US, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · May 23, 2025

Except as otherwise provided in this 8 Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that 9 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the 10 material … If only a 16 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 17 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 18 in the margins).

Kelly Hirt v. Riverside County

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 22, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 13 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 14 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 25 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 26 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 27 markings in the margins

James Camper v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 4, 2024

If only a 25 || portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 27 margins). 28 … If only a portion of the material on a page 9 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

SkyWest Airlines, Inc. v. Patricia T. Stambelos

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 4, 2026

If only a portion 20 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 21 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 22 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies 6 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 7 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Humanitarian Law Project v. United States Department of Treasury

463 F. Supp. 2d 1049 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 21, 2006

But as explained earlier, Plaintiffs’ proposed conduct is clearly prohibited by the Executive Order. … Plaintiffs are therefore clearly associating with the PKK and the LTTE, which are SDGTs under the EO.

Emmitt Bryant v. City of Los Angeles, Officer Jordan T. Patton, and Officer Luis A. Medina

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 18, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 5 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 6 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 7 margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 20 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 21

Sun Nong Dan Foods, Inc. v. Daeho Dining Group, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 11, 2024

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, 7 the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 8 making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material 18 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 19 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 20 (b)

Carmen Barrios v. All Ways Caring Health Care

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 6, 2024

If only a 6 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 7 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 8 margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 18 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 19 making appropriate markings in the margins).