Case law

Alex Lopez and Travell Woods, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Suzuki Motor of America, Inc., and Does 1-50, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 5, 2025

Except as otherwise provided in this 17 Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that 18 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material … If only a portion of the 11 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 12 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 13

Vivek Shah v. Mondelez Global LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 6, 2025

If only a portion 11 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 12 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 13 markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 26 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 27 privilege review.

Colin Thatcher v. Serenade at River Park

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 8, 2024

If only 22 a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 23 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 24 making appropriate markings … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 7 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 8 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Blonde Voyage Salon LLC v. Mark D. Kremer; Zachary T. Page

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 20, 2025

If only a 26 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 27 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 1 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 12 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 13 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Kittok v. Leslie's Poolmart, Inc.

687 F. Supp. 2d 953 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 4, 2009

Plaintiff clearly prevailed on her DPA claim; the Court issued a judgment in her favor on that claim, and granted her the statutory penalty requested. … It is debatable whether the challenged entries truly qualify as block billing.

Lillian McCloskey v. The Gathering Spot LA LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 29, 2025

If only a portion of the 7 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 8 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 9 A Party … If only a portion of the 18 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 19 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 20 (b)

Tamika Fair v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 28, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 24 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 25 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 7 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 8 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 9 in the margins).

David Curry v. Mid-Continent Instrument Co., Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 11, 2024

If only a 12 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 13 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 14 in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 14 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 15 without prior privilege review.

Cherise Marie Walton v. County of Riverside

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 6, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 17 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 18 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 4 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without 5 prior privilege review.

Frank Villaran v. County of San Bernardino

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 23, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 27 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 28 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 10 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 11 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in 12 the margins

Herbert O Allen Jr. v. Marin Contreras

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 5, 2025

If only a 12 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 13 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 14 in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 9 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 10 without prior privilege review.

N.Z. v. Fenix International Limited

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 3, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 1 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 2 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not 2 intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order 3 that provides for production without prior privilege review.

Noah Shumate v. City of Placentia, Officer Contreras, Officer Lemus, Sgt. Tom McKenzie, Chief Butts, Former Chief Leny

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 14, 2025

If only a 2 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 3 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 4 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the 14 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 15 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 16

Arthur Broughton v. FCA US, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · May 23, 2025

Except as otherwise provided in this 8 Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that 9 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the 10 material … If only a 16 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 17 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 18 in the margins).

Vanessa Lynn Taha v. Turk Hava Yollari A O

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 16, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 13 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 14 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … If 24 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 25 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 26 appropriate markings in the margins).

Kelly Hirt v. Riverside County

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 22, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 13 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 14 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 25 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 26 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 27 markings in the margins

Gamaliel Ayon Nunez; Maria Cristina Lozoya Melendez; Isak Francisco Rodriguez Lozoya; Cristian Isais Rodriguez Lozoya; Ivan Damian Rodriguez Lozoya v. County of Riverside; Deputy R. Gale; and Does 1-20, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 6, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 28 /// 1 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the … This provision is not intended to modify 27 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 28 production without prior privilege review.

Kentoya Mitchell v. Sonesta International Hotels Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 20, 2024

If only a portion or portions 2 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 3 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in 4 the margins … If 15 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 16 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 17 appropriate markings in the margins

L'Garde, Inc. v. Raytheon Space & Airborne Systems

805 F. Supp. 2d 932 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 26, 2011

Therefore, the Court finds the forum selection clause in the Letter Subcontract is too general to qualify as a mandatory forum selection clause. See Hunt Wesson Foods, 817 F.2d 75 . Calisher & Assocs., Inc. v. … Nor is national security so clearly implicated, as the disputed ISIS phase lacked a defense priority rating.

Dmitry Andrianov v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 30, 2024

If only a portion of the material on a page 24 qualifies for protection, the producing party also must clearly identify the 25 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion of the material 8 on a page qualifies for protection, the producing party also must clearly 9 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 10