Case law

Travis Alexander v. Garry D. Whitfield

District Court, C.D. California · May 20, 2025

Strotek Corp. v. Air Transp. Ass’n of Am., 300 F.3d 1129, 1131 (9th Cir. 2002). A natural person is a citizen of the state in which the person is domiciled. Kanter v. … July 30, 2010) (stating that a party can establish citizenship by submitting a sworn declaration); see also Brown v. United Airlines, Inc., No. 19cv537-MMA (JLB), 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113854, at *6 (S.D. Cal.

Epifanio Tapias v. Ced Metro and 4309 District Blvd, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · May 19, 2026

Langer v. Kiser, 57 F.4th 1085, 1093 (9th Cir. 2023) (citing Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc., 631 F.3d 939, 944 (9th Cir. 2011) (en banc)), cert. denied, 144 S. Ct. 823 (2024), reh’g denied, 144 S. … See Brooke v. CSP Hosp. LLC, No. EDCV 20-2202-JGB-SHKx, 2021 WL 401990, at *4 (C.D. Cal.

Gilbert Carrier Corp. v. Receivers and Shippers, Inc.

350 F. Supp. 1119 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 3, 1972

Its Board of Directors consists of elected members *1122 who maintain a firm control over the activities of the association although they leave its day-to-day operation to a managing agent who is paid on the basis of the … Columbia Shippers and Receivers Association, Inc. v. United States, 301 F.Supp. 310 (D.Del.1969).

Jin Liu v. Noem Kristi et al

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 5, 2026

On February 6, 2025, Petitioner submitted a motion to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) to reopen his immigration proceedings. Id.; Pet. { 26; Tolchin Decl. Ex. D. On April 16, 2025, this motion was denied. … Petitioner did not appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals because, according to Petitioner, any such appeal is futile. Id.

In re Indefinite Detention Cases

82 F. Supp. 2d 1098 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 27, 2000

. § 236.1 (d)(3) which permit an appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals. The factors a district director may consider are listed in 8 C.F.R. § 241.4 (a). … United States v.

Caroline Villasanti v. County of Riverside

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 5, 2023

Estate of 10 Maldonado v. Sec’y of the Cal. Dep’t of Corr. & Rehab., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11 91084, at *13-17 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2007); Doe No. 59 v. Santa Rose City Sch., 12 2017 U.S. Dist. … Attorneys for Plaintiffs 9 10 11 12 || Dated:__9/5/2023 ___/s/ Erin Brown Doug C. Smith, Esq. 13 Erin R.

Andranik Karagulyan v. Kilolo Kijakazi

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 1, 2023

See Brown v. Roe, 279 F.3d 742, 744-45 (9th Cir. 2002); see 4 || also United States v. Howell, 231 F.3d 615, 621-22 (9th Cir. 2000). … See Sossa v. Diaz, 729 F.3d 1225, 1231 (9th Cir. 2013) (district court 8 || abuses its discretion when it fails to consider new and “novel” arguments ?

Marc Lopez v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 3, 2021

See Brown v. Brotman Med. Ctr., Inc., 571 F. … Brown, 571 F. App’x at 575; see Garcia v. Rite Aid 15 Corp., 2017 WL 1737718, at *7 (C.D. Cal. May 3, 2017) (finding no preemption of 16 retaliation claim under Cal. Lab.

Walter Glenn Compton v. Montgomery

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 10, 2020

GLENN COMPTON, Case No. 2:16-cv-08557-ODW-KES 12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND 13 v. … To the extent the objections can be construed as raising 7 | new claims and arguments, the Court exercises its discretion not to consider them. 8 | See Brown v.

Lisa Morgan v. Disney Entertainment LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 12, 2024

Brown v. Brotman Med. Ctr., Inc., 571 F. App’x 572, 575 (9th Cir. 2014) (quoting Young v. Anthony’s Fish Grottos, Inc., 830 F.2d 993, 1001 (9th Cir. 1987)). … See Brown, 571 F.

Beltran Rosas v. County of San Bernardino

260 F. Supp. 2d 990 · District Court, C.D. California · May 5, 2003

In Webb v. … “The district court should ‘focus on the significance of the overall relief obtained by the plaintiff in relation to the hours reasonably expended on the litigation.’ ” Corder v. Brown, 25 F.3d 833, 836 (9th Cir.1994).

Jose Garcia v. M. Gamboa

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 1, 2023

See Brown v. … See Walden v. Shinn, 990 F.3d 1183, 1196 (9th Cir. 2021) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A)). “Exhaustion requires that a petitioner fairly present his federal claims 28 to the highest state court available.” Id.

Anderson v. Roberts

659 F. Supp. 19 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 1, 1986

Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 , 92 S.Ct. 1208 , 31 L.Ed.2d 551 (1972); cf. Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 , 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982); Lossman v. Pekarske, supra, at 290. 3. … Duchesne v. Sugarman, 566 F.2d 817 (2nd Cir.1977); Lossman v. Pekarske, supra.

Nakia Mcclain v. Kilolo Kujakazi

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 23, 2022

Brown-Hunter v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 17 || F.3d at 492 (citations omitted).

Eddie Earl Haskin v. Stu Shermen

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 12, 2020

Brown v. … See 4 Brown, 889 F.3d at 668; Cooper v. Calderon, 274 F.3d 1270, 1274 (9th Cir. 5 2001). 6 B.

Hurst Concrete Products, Inc. v. American Pipe & Construction Co.

50 F.R.D. 86 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 2, 1970

City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court (1969), 271 A.C.A. 348, 76 Cal.Rptr. 256 ; Market-Front Co. v. Superior Court (1969), 271 A.C.A. 571, 76 Cal.Rptr. 526 ; Paul W. Speer, Inc. v. … That board, however, has two sides.

Hunter Douglas, Inc. v. Harmonic Design, Inc.

962 F. Supp. 1249 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 15, 1997

See Christianson v. Colt Indus. Operating Corp., 486 U.S. 800, 809 , 108 S.Ct. 2166, 2174 , 100 L.Ed.2d 811 (1988) (quoting, Franchise Tax Board of California v. … The Court stated in Bonito Boats v.

Michael Windeler v. Cambria Community Services District

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 6, 2022

McMillan v. Goleta Water Dist., 792 F.2d 1453, 1457- 1458 (9th Cir. 1986); Gilbert v. … Co. v.

Noe Villanueva v. Gruma Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 29, 2025

Theis Research, Inc. v. Brown & Bain, 400 F.3d 659, 662 (9th Cir. 2005). “[T]his includes any result of the litigation, excluding interests and costs, that ‘entails a payment’ by the defendant.” Gonzales v. … June 26, 2017) (quoting Brown v. TranSouth Fin. Corp., 897 F.Supp. 1398, 1401 (M.D. Ala. 1995) (quoting Tompkins v. Lowe's Home Center, Inc., 847 F.Supp. 462, 464 (E.D.La.1994) (citing Green v.

James Smith v. Ron Broomfield

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 24, 2021

(Pet. 2.)2 In July 2017, after a holding a youth offender parole hearing, the State of California Board of Parole Hearings (“Parole Board”) denied Petitioner release on parole for a period of five years. … Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509, 522 (1982). Here, to the extent Petitioner challenges his 1989 judgment—as opposed to the Parole Board’s 2017 parole denial—the Petition appears to be unexhausted on its face.