Case law

Nancy Cohen v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 28, 2024

If only a portion of the material on a page 9 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 10 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 11 A Party … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 21 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 22 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Porco v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

682 F. Supp. 2d 1057 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 19, 2010

The district court should exercise its discretion, however, only when circumstances clearly establish that additional evidence is necessary to conduct an adequate de novo review of the benefit decision. … Given the substantial medical evidence already in the record, the court cannot say that the “circumstances clearly establish that additional evidence is necessary to conduct an adequate de novo review of the benefit decision

Salem Media Group, Inc. v. Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 12, 2024

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 25 || protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 26 || (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 27 … If only a portion of the material on 10 || a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 11 || protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 12

Christopher E. Batres v. Warden

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 25, 2020

To assert 23 a violation of Title II of the ADA, Plaintiff must plausibly allege that: (1) he is a qualified 24 individual with a disability; (2) he was excluded from participation in or otherwise 25 … If Plaintiff elects to file a First Amended 6 Complaint, he shall either omit his ADA claim(s) or clearly identify which Defendants he 7 believes violated the ADA as well as the disability he has and clearly explain

Yanira Baires v. ABM Industry Groups, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 25, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 6 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 7 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 17 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 18 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

In Re Wet Seal, Inc. Securities Litigation

518 F. Supp. 2d 1148 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 29, 2007

In re Immune Response Secs. Litig., 375 F.Supp.2d 983, 1020 (S.D.Cal.2005) (quoting America West, 320 F.3d at 934 (internal citations omitted)). … Whether a statement qualifies for safe harbor protection is a proper inquiry on a motion to dismiss. Clorox, 353 F.3d at 1132 .

Whitney Bowman, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated v. ELITE MD, INC.

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 24, 2026

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 15 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 16 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 26 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 27 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 1 (b) for testimony

Sweet James LLP v. Sweet Justice, P.C.

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 18, 2024

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 5 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 6 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If 16 only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 17 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 18 markings in the margins

April Davis v. The Kroger Company

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 8, 2024

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 12 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 13 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 23 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 24 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 25 in the margins).

Multiple Energy Technologies, LLC v. Seth Casden

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 21, 2025

Casden then conceded that MET had 6 established “all elements” of the tortious interference claim. (See id. at 476:6–8, 7 492:22–24.) The only issue he reserved was that of agency immunity. (Id.) … (Id.) 18 Even if some of these entries are vague in isolation, when viewed in the context of 19 other entries, they are clearly sufficiently descriptive.

Glareh Tafreshi v. Walgreen Pharmacy Services Midwest, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 27, 2024

Except as otherwise provided in this 4 Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that 5 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 13 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 14 by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Williams v. Clark

52 F. Supp. 2d 1145 · District Court, C.D. California · May 21, 1999

Thus, to implement the Act and to establish the specific criteria for sentence reductions under 18 U.S.C. § 3621 (e)(2)(B), the BOP, promulgated 28 C.F.R. § 550.58 on May 25, 1995, and issued Program Statement 5162.02 on … '‘[T]he [BOP’s] endowment of broad discretion does not immunize its decisions from judicial review, especially concerning questions of statutory interpretation.” Downey, 100 F.3d at 666 .

Anne Heiting v. Taro Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 20, 2024

If only a portion 2 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 3 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 4 markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies 15 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 16 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Arnott v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services

290 F.R.D. 579 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 22, 2012

A three judge panel cannot overrule prior Ninth Circuit precedent—let alone an en banc decision—unless “the reasoning or theory of [] prior circuit authority is clearly irreconcilable with the reasoning or theory of intervening … Likewise, Defendant does not dispute that Plaintiffs’ counsel is qualified to “pursue the action vigorously” on behalf of the proposed class.

Frank Menyhart v. Los Angeles Police Department

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 21, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 18 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 19 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … Then, before 27 producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the 1 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 2 also must clearly identify

Jose Flores v. Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 12, 2024

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 22 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 23 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 5 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 6 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 7 in the margins).

Gabriel Martinez v. Prime Source Building Products Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 5, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 6 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 7 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 17 portion or portions of the material on a page 18 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 19 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate

Gina Youngblood v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 18, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 18 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 19 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the 6 1 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 2 the protected

Tarondra Nelson v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 24, 2025

If only a portion 6 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 7 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 8 in the margins). … If only a 18 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 19 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 20 markings in the margins).

United Auto Credit Corporation v. Jessica Stewart

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 29, 2025

If only 21 a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 22 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 23 protected … If only a portion or 14 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 15 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 16 (e.g.,