Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscacd

3,916 results

0.61s

  • Edward Lewis v. Magnite, Inc

    District Court, C.D. California · Apr 7, 2026

    The parties’ mere designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material as 26 CONFIDENTIAL does not—without the submission of competent evidence by 27 declaration, establishing that the material sought to be filed under seal … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 22 protection, to the extent it is practical to do so, the Producing Party also must 23 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Neurobrands, LLC v. Neurogum, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 31, 2020

    If only a portion or portions of the 21 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 22 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 23 … If only a portion or portions of the material on 7 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 8 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 9

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • William Allen v. Matthew P. Donovan

    District Court, C.D. California · Sep 16, 2021

    If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 13 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 14 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 19 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 20 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • May v. Hunter

    451 F. Supp. 2d 1084 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 30, 2006

    Valdez, 89 Cal.App.4th 1013, 1017-18 , 107 Cal.Rptr.2d 783 (2001) (opinion of qualified mental health professional provides sufficient evidence to support MDO finding); People v. … established federal law.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • John Smith v. Jane Doe

    District Court, C.D. California · Feb 6, 2025

    If only 22 | a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 24 | in the margins). … If only a portion of the material 6 | ona page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 7 | protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 8

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Shawn Thompson v. City of Manhattan Beach, Steve Kitsios, and Shane Smith

    District Court, C.D. California · Oct 6, 2025

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 33 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 44 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 55 … If 1144 only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 1155 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 1166 appropriate markings in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jane Doe, f/k/a Kristy Althaus v. Aylo Global Entertainment Inc., Aylo USA Incorporated, Aylo Billing US Corp., Aylo Holdings S.À.R.L., Aylo Freesites, Ltd., d/b/a “Porn Hub,” 9219-1568 Quebec, Inc., and Aylo Premium Ltd.

    District Court, C.D. California · Nov 13, 2025

    If only a portion or portions of the material on a 20 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 21 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making redactions or appropriate markings in the … If only a portion or portions 14 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 15 clearly identify the protected portion(s) by page and line designations.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Andric v. California

    55 F. Supp. 2d 1056 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 22, 1999

    The government has a legitimate need to attract qualified lawyers as well as to maintain high ethical standards. … First, it is not correct that the Ninth Circuit has established a rigid rule that imputed disqualification “does not apply to government attorneys.” As to Weiner , see footnote 11. As to United States v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jane Doe, f/k/a Kristy Althaus v. Aylo Global Entertainment Inc., Aylo USA Incorporated, Aylo Billing US Corp., Aylo Holdings S.À.R.L., Aylo Freesites, Ltd., d/b/a “Porn Hub,” 9219-1568 Quebec, Inc., Aylo Premium Ltd.

    District Court, C.D. California · Nov 13, 2025

    If only a portion or portions of the material on a 20 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 21 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making redactions or appropriate markings in the … If only a portion or portions 14 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 15 clearly identify the protected portion(s) by page and line designations.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Anne Heiting v. Taro Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Sep 20, 2024

    If only a portion 2 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 3 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 4 markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies 15 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 16 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • John DM Doe v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints

    District Court, C.D. California · Feb 14, 2025

    If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies 12 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 13 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended 10 to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that 11 provides for production without prior privilege review.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jose Flores v. Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Sep 12, 2024

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 22 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 23 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 5 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 6 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 7 in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gabriel Martinez v. Prime Source Building Products Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Sep 5, 2024

    If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 6 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 7 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 17 portion or portions of the material on a page 18 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 19 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Porco v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

    682 F. Supp. 2d 1057 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 19, 2010

    The district court should exercise its discretion, however, only when circumstances clearly establish that additional evidence is necessary to conduct an adequate de novo review of the benefit decision. … Given the substantial medical evidence already in the record, the court cannot say that the “circumstances clearly establish that additional evidence is necessary to conduct an adequate de novo review of the benefit decision

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Jeremiah Scholes v. Veradigm LLC

    District Court, C.D. California · Apr 1, 2026

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, 14 the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 15 making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material 25 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 26 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Tashauna Seale v. GSK Consumer Health, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · May 20, 2024

    Except as otherwise provided in 1 stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection 2 under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or 3 produced … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 21 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 22 without prior privilege review.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Josefina Lozano v. FCA US, LLC

    District Court, C.D. California · Mar 13, 2025

    Except as otherwise provided in this 12 Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that 13 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the 14 material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 5 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 6 appropriate markings in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Tarondra Nelson v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Apr 24, 2025

    If only a portion 6 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 7 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 8 in the margins). … If only a 18 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 19 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 20 markings in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Andrea Linder v. Walmart, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Sep 25, 2025

    If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 4 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 5 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of 15 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 16 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 17

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Meadows v. Biter

    980 F. Supp. 2d 1148 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 3, 2013

    In fact, Petitioner’s counsel argued to the jury in closing argument that Crawford’s testimony established that it was Avery, not Petitioner, who had burglarized the homes with Piolet that day. (RT 1602, 1605-06.) … In order to qualify for this exception, however, a petitioner “must produce sufficient proof of his actual innocence to bring him within the narrow class of cases ... implicating a fundamental miscarriage of justice.”

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.