Case law

Alex Bear v. Republic Bancorp, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 12, 2024

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 2 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) … must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 15 in the margins).

VYACHESLAV FINOGEYEV, et. al. v. MERCEDES-BENZ FINANCIAL SERVICES USA, LLC et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 7, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 15 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 16 … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 4 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 5 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 6 margins

Grande Cosmetics, LLC v. HDMA, Inc. d/b/a Forchics

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 1, 2026

Except as otherwise provided in 2 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that 3 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the 4 material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, 12 the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 13 making appropriate markings in the margins).

Kloii Hollis v. City of Los Angeles; and Does 1-10, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 28, 2026

If only a 9 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, 10 the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 11 portion(s) … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 21 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 22 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Corey Woodard v. City of Ontario; and Does 1 through 20 Inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 21, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 4 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 5 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 15 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 16 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 17 appropriate markings in the margins

Tommy T. Lor v. FCA US LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 2, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a 24 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 25 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 26 in the … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 11 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 12 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

TAYLOR HANEY v. SERVICE FINANCE COMPANY, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 24, 2025

and legal 27 justification, must be made with respect to Protected Material that a 1 or Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not—without the 2 submission of competent evidence by declaration, establishing … This 4 provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be 5 established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without 6 prior privilege review.

Chloe Sanchez v. Knott’s Berry Farm LLC; Millennium Operations LLC; Cedar Fair L.P.; Cedar Fair Management, Inc.; Richard A. Zimmerman; and Does 1 through 50, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 5, 2026

Except as otherwise provided in this 20 Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that 21 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 12 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 13 making appropriate markings in the margins).

In re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigation

978 F. Supp. 2d 1053 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 7, 2013

John experienced a neurologic condition that may have affected her ability to control the Camry is clearly relevant to a jury tasked with determining the cause of the collision. … Driver’s qualified expert witness testifies that in her opinion the accident was caused by a defect in the steering mechanism.

Estate of Steve De Leon Gonzalez, by and through successors in interest, Steve Anthony De Leon and Rosario Gonzalez; Steve Anthony De Leon, individually; Rosario Gonzalez, individually v. County of Riverside, a public entity; Riverside County Sheriff’s Department; Sheriff Chad Bianco, in his individual and official capacity

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 28, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 24 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 25 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of 6 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 7

Raymond Cox v. Princess Cruise Lines Ltd

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 9, 2021

If 16 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 17 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 18 appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion or 2 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 3 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 4 in the margins

Flynn v. Sun Life Assurance Co.

809 F. Supp. 2d 1175 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 10, 2011

Such declarations are admissible for purposes of establishing the Administrative Record. See, e.g., Marks v. … Therefore, Flynn’s work at Raytheon does not qualify. . The Parol Evidence Rule does not advance Plaintiffs case either.

Bethany Farber v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · May 24, 2023

The burden of establishing the absence of a 12 genuine issue of material fact lies with the moving party, see Celotex Corp. v. … Farber contends the officers 9 violated her Fourth Amendment rights when they arrested her, first, because the 10 Warrant was infirm as it named the wrong person, and second, because Moorer was 11 not qualified

Jankey v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.

14 F. Supp. 2d 1174 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 6, 1998

The federal regulations clearly identify a movie studio which makes tours available as such a facility. … In Independent Living, the district court examined whether certain “executive suites” within a sporting arena qualified for an exemption from the ADA.

Multiple Energy Technologies, LLC v. Seth Casden

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 21, 2025

Casden then conceded that MET had 6 established “all elements” of the tortious interference claim. (See id. at 476:6–8, 7 492:22–24.) The only issue he reserved was that of agency immunity. (Id.) … (Id.) 18 Even if some of these entries are vague in isolation, when viewed in the context of 19 other entries, they are clearly sufficiently descriptive.

Mark Williams v. Under Armour, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 16, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, 4 the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 5 appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the 17 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 18 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

DLC, an Addison Group Company; Addison Professional Financial aka APFS Staffing, Inc. v. Michael H. Leb, Esq.; Patricio T.D. Barrera, Esq.

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 19, 2024

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 17 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 18 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 22 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 23 privilege review.

Morteza Rezaei v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 23, 2025

Except as otherwise provided in 8 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 9 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 10 the material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 17 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 18 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Jane Roe RL 8 v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 24, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 20 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 21 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 3 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 4 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 5 markings in the margins).

Kenneth Prado, an individual, v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., a Delaware corporation; and Does 1 through 20, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 22, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 2 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 3 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 13 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 14 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 15 markings in the margins).