Case law

Yolanda Sanchez v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 12, 2020

If only a 2 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 3 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 4 markings in the margins … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 18 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 19 without prior privilege review.

Claudia E.T. Kleefeld v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 29, 2025

If only a 22 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 23 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 24 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the 7 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 8 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 9

Inland Empire Waterkeeper and Orange County Waterkeeper v. Amrep Manufacturing Company, LLC, Wastequip Manufacturing Company, LLC and Rexford

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 25, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 7 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 8 markings in the margins). … If only a portion or 17 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 18 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 19

Kinsey McLaughlin v. Columbia Debt Recovery, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 16, 2024

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 15 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 16 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 26 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 27 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 1 (b) for testimony

COLUR WORLD, LLC v. Schneider Medical Industries

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 24, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 26 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 27 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 10 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 11 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Curtis Conyers v. Marisa Cano

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 2, 2020

If only a portion or 15 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 16 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 17 (e.g., by making … If only a portion or portions of 2 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 3 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 4 appropriate

JANE DOE, an individual, and all those similarly situated v. TESLA INC.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 6, 2025

Except as otherwise provided in this Order, 15 or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that qualifies for protection 16 under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 22 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 23 appropriate markings in the margins).

GS Holistic, LLC v. One Stop Vape

District Court, C.D. California · May 22, 2025

for protection under this Stipulated 19 Protective Order must be clearly so designated before the material is 20 disclosed or produced. 21 Designation … This 15 provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be 16 established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without 17 prior privilege review.

Jon Anthony Clark v. Freedom Forever LLC

District Court, C.D. California · May 20, 2025

If only a portion or portions of 3 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 4 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 5 markings … This provision is not intended 21 to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that 22 provides for production without prior privilege review.

Freddy Cahue v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, and Does 1 to 25, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 1, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 15 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 16 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 26 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 27 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Romula Cortez v. County of Orange, a California Public entity; City of San Clemente, a California Public entity

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 9, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 7 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 8 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 22 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 23 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate

Dawin Liranzo Galan, an Individual; Roland Broccko, an Individual; Rebecca Singh, an Individual v. United States District Court, Central District of California

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 2, 2026

If only a 14 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 15 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 16 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the 26 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 27 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 28

Steven Eric Gould v. County of Orange

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 31, 2023

Plaintiff asserts that these 4 facts have been established and verified in two pending cases that he filed in the 5 U.S. … There is nothing in Plaintiff’s District of Nevada cases to substantiate 18 that he is an uncover officer or is entitled to diplomatic immunity.

Jane Doe v. City of Riverside, Henry Ventura; and Does 1 through 10, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 18, 2026

Except as otherwise provided in this 7 Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that 8 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the 9 material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 16 protection, the Producing Party also must 17 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in

Convergent Media IV LLC v. Aperture Media Partners LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 16, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on 18 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 19 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 1 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 2 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 3 markings in the margins

CHASE HUNTER v. DESTINATION PET, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 9, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 17 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 18 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 28 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 1 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Rahid Jones v. County of Los Angeles; G Deelpeust; I Cn Acl Mus Piv Oe S; and Does 1 through 10

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 7, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 6 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 7 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 17 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 18 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Alan G. Niven v. Guns N’ Roses, a California partnership, and Does 1-10, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 27, 2026

If only a portion or 8 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 9 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 10 markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the 22 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 23 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 24 margins

M.M. v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 23, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 18 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 19 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 1 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 2 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 3

D2 Productions, Inc. v. Universal Music Corp., a Delaware Corporation; Songs of Universal, Inc., a Delaware corporation; and Does 1 through 20 inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 16, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a 5 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 6 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 7 … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 3 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 4 privilege review.