Case law

Jobiak LLC v. Botmakers LLC

District Court, C.D. California · May 27, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material 28 1 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected … This 18 provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery 19 order that provides for production without prior privilege review.

In Re Air Passenger Comp. Res. Sys. Antitrust Lit.

694 F. Supp. 1443 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 25, 1988

However, plaintiff has the burden of establishing that local CRS markets are "relevant markets" if the conduct of the attempted monopolizer is ambiguous or not clearly predatory. … In this case, United's conduct is ambiguous or not clearly predatory.

Wilson Renan Cueva Rapalo v. Target

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 31, 2025

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 14 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 15 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 25 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 26 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 27 in the margins).

The Estate of Trevor Loflin v. City of Huntington Beach

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 11, 2025

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 14 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion … If 26 only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 27 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 28 appropriate markings in the margins).

Blake Anderson v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 11, 2025

If only a portion 28 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 1 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 2 markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies 13 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 14 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins

United States v. Rahmani

209 F. Supp. 2d 1045 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 21, 2002

commitment of the issue to a coordinate political department; (2) a lack of judicially discoverable and manageable standards for resolving it; (3) the impossibility of deciding without an initial policy determination of a kind clearly … Moreover, Section 1189 should not be immune from facial attack simply because it can be applied to an entity that does not enjoy constitutional rights.

Pfeifer v. United States Shoe Corp.

676 F. Supp. 969 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 27, 1987

there was just cause for the termination of plaintiff — all Brandstand stores were sold to a company not affiliated in any way with defendant; there were no vacancies in any management positions for which plaintiff was qualified … stated that “[i]f a claimant alleges two or more promises of performance ‘that can easily be distinguished and separated by the court by reference to the agreement itself ..., only that promise of performance which falls clearly

Alyssa A. Williams, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Tasha Monique Woods, Deceased, Jacob Williams, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Tasha Monique Woods, Deceased, Le’Roy M. Woods, individually, and Patricia Borello, individually v.

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 21, 2026

If only a 10 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 11 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 12 markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the 22 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 23 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 24

Starquest Ventures, Inc. v. Dexcom, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 21, 2025

If only a portion or portions 18 of the material on a page qualify for protection, the Producing Party should to the 19 extent practicable clearly identify the protected portion(s) (for example, by making 20 appropriate … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 4 qualify for protection, the Producing Party should to the extent practical clearly 5 identify the protected portion(s) (for example, by making appropriate markings

Estate of Richard Osaki v. San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 15, 2025

Except as otherwise provided in this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the … If only a 16] portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 17||clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 18] margins)

Abby Barz v. Corso Commerce, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 8, 2025

If only a portion or 23 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 24 … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 6 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 7 making appropriate markings in the margins).

Golnaz Paya, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Macy’s Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 15, 2025

If only a portion of the material on a page 24 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 25 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 26 A Party … If only a portion of the material on 8 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 9

Ryan Ted Kennedy v. LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 16, 2025

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 5 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 6 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 21 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 22 without prior privilege review.

Ricardo Meraz v. HD Supply, Inc.; HD Supply Management, Inc.; HD Supply Management, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 17, 2026

Except as otherwise provided in 11 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that 12 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material … If only a portion 19 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 20 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 21

Connor Morgan Huff, an individual, William Huff, an individual v. Homesite Insurance Company of the Midwest, a foreign corporation; and Does 1-10, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 20, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 15 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 16 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 26 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 27 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Everardo Alvarez Rios v. O Reilly Auto Enterprises LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 14, 2025

The parties’ mere designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material as 11 CONFIDENTIAL does not—without the submission of competent evidence by 12 declaration, establishing that the material sought to be filed under seal … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies 6 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 7 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Jeremy Lewi v. Comenity Capital Bank

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 14, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 1 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 2 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 3 margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 16 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 17

Marco Baeza v. Coast Community College District

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 11, 2024

Except as otherwise provided in 4 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 5 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 6 the material … If only a 12 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 13 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 14 in the margins).

Sage Hayashi v. United Rentals North America, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 11, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Riggs v. Fairman

178 F. Supp. 2d 1141 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 14, 2001

Strickland “has long been clearly established federal law determined by the Supreme Court of the United States,” within the meaning of section 2254(d). Baylor v. … Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 391 , 120 S.Ct. 1495 , 146 L.Ed.2d 389 (2000) (“It is past question that the rule set forth in Strickland qualifies as ‘clearly established Federal law ... ’ That the Strickland test ‘of necessity requires