Case law

Dominique Washington v. Deputy D. Lopez

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 29, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 25 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 26 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 8 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 9 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 10

Erika Louraine Johnson v. FCA US, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 16, 2025

Except as otherwise provided in 28 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 1 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 2 the material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 9 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(

Malik Aaron v. Target Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 1, 2023

The Deputies are not entitled to qualified immunity 2 The Deputies are not entitled to qualified immunity on Plaintiffs’ excessive force claim based 3 on the undisputed facts before the Court. … ”).21 Therefore, the Court does not 21 find that qualified immunity applies at this stage. 22 Accordingly, the Court DENIES summary judgment as to the Seventh Cause of Action. 23 /

Everardo Alvarez Rios v. O Reilly Auto Enterprises LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 14, 2025

The parties’ mere designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material as 11 CONFIDENTIAL does not—without the submission of competent evidence by 12 declaration, establishing that the material sought to be filed under seal … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies 6 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 7 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Jeremy Lewi v. Comenity Capital Bank

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 14, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 1 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 2 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 3 margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 16 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 17

Wang v. Chinese Daily News, Inc.

231 F.R.D. 602 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 20, 2005

Here, class-wide in-junctive relief clearly would be both reasonably necessary and appropriate to protect CDN’s employees. … The common questions of law and fact set forth above clearly predominate in this case. 2.

Estate of Yareth Aguilar Villagomez v. County of Riverside

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 14, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 7 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 8 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 18 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 19 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 20 markings in the margins

Noel Phillips v. City of Los Angeles, a municipal entity, Jim McDonnell, LAPD Chief, sued in his official capacity; and Does 1-10 inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 8, 2026

If only a 23 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 24 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 25 margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 7 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 8 by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Renell B. Thorpe v. Moise

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 4, 2025

Therefore, state officials sued in their official capacity are generally entitled to 14 immunity. Id. at 825. … Such allegations establish no deprivation of “the minimal civilized 4 measure of life’s necessities.” Farmer, 511 U.S. at 832 (internal quotation marks 5 omitted).

Jeremiah Ballew v. Huuuge, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 1, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 10 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 11 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 21 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 22 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

1800 Rosecrans Partners, LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 15, 2024

for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 1 2 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … This provision is not intended to modify 23 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 24

In Re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities Litigation

416 F. Supp. 161 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 23, 1976

Both defendant exchanges have established procedures and requirements for the listing and delisting of securities on their exchanges. … Parden is clearly distinguishable from the § 10(b) claims in the present case, because Congress literally excluded states from the class of “persons” who can be sued under § 10(b). 22 Furthermore, neither § 17 of the 1933

Mark Soria v. Licata & Yeremenko, A Professional Law Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 6, 2026

Except as otherwise provided in this 9 Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that qualifies 10 for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the … If only a portion 17 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 18 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 19 A Party

In Re Air Passenger Comp. Res. Sys. Antitrust Lit.

694 F. Supp. 1443 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 25, 1988

However, plaintiff has the burden of establishing that local CRS markets are "relevant markets" if the conduct of the attempted monopolizer is ambiguous or not clearly predatory. … In this case, United's conduct is ambiguous or not clearly predatory.

Marko Mandaric, Kahlie Mandaric v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., dba Chase Auto Finance; Doe 1 Repossession Agency; Doe 2 Tow Operator; and Does 3-15

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 8, 2026

Except as otherwise provided in 10 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 11 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the 12 material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 19 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 20 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Jessica Ramos, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for A.R., a minor, and N.R., a minor v. County of San Bernardino, Eimmy Kafka, Sharon Gonzalez, Richard Meza, Does 1-5

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 7, 2026

If only a portion or 25 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 26 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in 27 the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, 11 the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 12 appropriate markings in the margins).

Wendy Winslow v. Target Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 28, 2025

Except as otherwise provided in 25 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 26 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 27 the … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 6 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 7 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Pfeifer v. United States Shoe Corp.

676 F. Supp. 969 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 27, 1987

there was just cause for the termination of plaintiff — all Brandstand stores were sold to a company not affiliated in any way with defendant; there were no vacancies in any management positions for which plaintiff was qualified … stated that “[i]f a claimant alleges two or more promises of performance ‘that can easily be distinguished and separated by the court by reference to the agreement itself ..., only that promise of performance which falls clearly

NT Capital Management LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, and Tien Dung Nguyen v. Truist Bank (erroneously sued as “Truist Bank, NA”)

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 14, 2025

Except as otherwise provided in this Order, 22 or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection 23 under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material … If only a portion or portions of the material 11 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 12 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Connor Morgan Huff, an individual, William Huff, an individual v. Homesite Insurance Company of the Midwest, a foreign corporation; and Does 1-10, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 20, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 15 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 16 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 26 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 27 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the