Case law

PROMEX, LLC v. Hernandez

781 F. Supp. 2d 1013 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 2, 2011

See Rano v. … (citation omitted); see also Brown v. Grimes, 192 Cal.App.4th 265, 278 , 120 Cal.Rptr.3d 893 (Ct.

Janeway v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

702 F. Supp. 795 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 1, 1988

Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938), quoted in Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 , 91 S.Ct. 1420, 1427 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971). … Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474, 487-88 , 71 S.Ct. 456, 463-65 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).

Almont Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLC v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc.

99 F. Supp. 3d 1110 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 10, 2015

Civ.Code § 954; Brown v. Guarantee Ins. Co., 155 Cal.App.2d 679, 693-695 , 319 P.2d 69 (1957)). … Brown, 586 F.3d at 1085 . The Brown court ultimately found that “[w]hen stripped of its ‘futility’ label,” the plaintiffs argument was “a winner.” Id. 2.

In Re: Charlotte Dial

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 9, 2020

See United States v. … Brown v. Celgene Corp., 2014 WL 12588296 at *1 n.2 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2014) (holding that the government’s decision not to intervene changed circumstances and supported reconsideration under Local Rule 7-18).

Cano v. Davis

193 F. Supp. 2d 1177 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 18, 2002

Circuit in Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co. v. Williams, 62 F.3d 408 (D.C.Cir.1995). … See Smith v.

Everett Lee Cox v. Pfiffer

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 19, 2023

Brown v. Muniz, 889 F.3d 661, 20 667, 676 (9th Cir. 2018) (“petitioner’s burden is higher” under statute to 21 bring successive habeas action); Prince v. Lizzaraga, 733 F. … Aleman v. Robertson, 2019 WL 7759070 (E.D. Cal. 2019); c.f. Brown v.

Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Co., Inc.

445 F. Supp. 2d 1116 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 15, 2006

See Katz v. … See Scott v.

United States v. Johnson

762 F. Supp. 275 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 19, 1991

American Tobacco Co. v. *279 Patterson, 456 U.S. 63, 71 , 102 S.Ct. 1534, 1538 , 71 L.Ed.2d 748 (1982); see also, Bob Jones University v. … v.

Samantha Cruz v. AI California LLC et al

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 5, 2025

(See Ex. 1 to Browning Decl., Compl., Doc. 4.) … Johnson v. Columbia Props. Anchorage, LP, 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006); see also Breckenridge v. Best Buy Co., 2010 WL 5315812, at *1 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2010) (explaining why the defendant’s reliance on Davis v.

Lucero v. Hensley

920 F. Supp. 1067 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 18, 1996

Brown v. Borough of Mahaffey, Pa., 35 F.3d 846, 850 (3rd Cir.1994) (citing City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, 473 U.S. 432 , 105 S.Ct. 3249 , 87 L.Ed.2d 313 (1985)). … Rizzo v.

Marquis v. United States

348 F. Supp. 987 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 14, 1972

See Rohde v. United States, 415 F.2d 695 (9th Cir. 1969). … Eclipse Lawn Mower Co. v. United States, 1 F.Supp. 768 (Ct.

Criswell v. Western Air Lines, Inc.

514 F. Supp. 384 · District Court, C.D. California · May 12, 1981

Kelly v. … The awards of the System Board and the opinion of its neutral arbitrator were admitted into evidence to be “accorded such weight as the court deems appropriate.” Alexander v.

Victor Diaz Sandoval v. County of Riverside

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 2, 2023

Ebner v. … v.

Taylor v. Chaffee

327 F. Supp. 1131 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 30, 1971

Hammond v. Lenfest, 398 F.2d 705 (2d Cir. 1968); Jarrett v. … In Jarrett v.

United States v. Samueli

575 F. Supp. 2d 1154 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 8, 2008

United States v. … Sa-mueli was Broadcom's Co-Founder and served as the Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors during much of the relevant period. 13 .

Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.

694 F. Supp. 1443 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 25, 1988

Thus, the Board has the power to outlaw conduct which may restrain competition. … Brown Shoe v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1524 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1961); Kaplan, 611 F.2d at 292-93 .

Divine Son Irvis v. J. Doerer

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 19, 2024

Woods v. Carey, 525 F.3d 886, 889 n.2 (9th Cir. 2008). Section 2241 permits a prisoner to challenge the manner in which the BOP is executing their sentence. See, e.g., Brown v. … See Reeb v.

Amalia Frausto v. Martin OMalley

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 31, 2025

See Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015) (as 17 amended); Parra v. Astrue, 481 F.3d 742, 746 (9th Cir. 2007). … See Brown-Hunter, 26 806 F.3d at 495; Bunnell, 336 F.3d at 1115-16.

Sage Products, Inc. v. Devon Industries, Inc.

880 F. Supp. 718 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 13, 1994

In re Donaldson Co., Inc., 16 F.3d 1189, 1192 (Fed.Cir.1994); Unique Concepts, Inc. v. Brown, 939 F.2d 1558, 1561 (Fed.Cir. 1991). … Thus, the opening in the second baffle goes “through” the baffle as a nail goes through a board. Id. 2.

White v. Ollison

592 F. Supp. 2d 1227 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 12, 2008

The Browning was polished and lighter in color than the Smith and Wesson, and when interviewed by police Barahona stated it was the one Jerro had used in the shooting. … Alcala v. Woodford, 334 F.3d 862, 887 (9th Cir.2003) (emphasis in original); Boyde v. Brown, 404 F.3d 1159, 1172 (9th Cir.2005), amended by, 421 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir.2005).