Case law

Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. Sajovich

642 F. Supp. 74 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 20, 1986

FSLIC v. Krueger, 435 F.2d 633, 635 (7th Cir.1970); Katin v. Apollo Savings, 460 F.2d 422, 424 (7th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 918 , 92 S.Ct. 1767 , 32 L.Ed.2d 117 . … Hancock Financial Corp. v. FSLIC, 492 F.2d 1325 , 1328 (9th Cir.1974). 4.

El Rescate Legal Services, Inc. v. Executive Office for Immigration Review

727 F. Supp. 557 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 14, 1989

Mathews v. … In Niarchos v.

Bonin v. Vasquez

794 F. Supp. 957 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 20, 1992

See California v. Brown, 479 U.S. 538 , 540 n. *, 107 S.Ct. 837 , 838 n. *, 93 L.Ed.2d 934 (1987). Enumerating the Aggravating and Mitigating Factors Petitioner does not explain what this requirement means. … If a sentence is found to be disparate, the Board notifies the sentencing judge who, in turn, holds a new sentencing hearing within 120 days to consider the Board’s finding. Id. 26 .

Yuriria Diaz v. Macys West Stores, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 21, 2021

(See Mot. 11 12 (citing Alcantar v. Hobart Serv., 800 F.3d 1047, 1057 (9th Cir. 2015); Brown v. 13 Ralphs Grocery Co., 28 Cal. App. 5th 824 (2018)).) … Brown, 28 Cal.

Herman Hawkins et al v. Crunch, LLC et al

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 30, 2026

(Declaration of Pamela Brown in Support of Notice of Removal (“Brown Decl.”), Dkt. No. 1-2). … Jauregui v. Roadrunner Transportation Servs., Inc., 28 F.4th 989, 993 (9th Cir. 2022) (citing Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 574 U.S. 81, 89 (2014)).

Rintel v. Wathen

806 F. Supp. 1467 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 24, 1992

Defendant Thomas Wathen is the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Pinkerton’s. … Sun Savings & Loan Assoc, v. Dierdorff, 825 F.2d 187, 191 (9th Cir.1987).

Bureerong v. Uvawas

922 F. Supp. 1450 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 21, 1996

Co. v. … IHA at 240 (Letter from Assemblyman Montoya to Governor Brown, dated September 3, 1975) (stating that Assembly Bill 353 (amendments to the IHA) “provides the tools for the Division of Industrial Welfare, and/or other law

Schwartz v. Harp

108 F.R.D. 279 · District Court, C.D. California · May 31, 1985

Binder] Fed.Sec.L.Rptr. ¶ 99,691 (S.D.N.Y.1984); Handweren v. Ginsbey, 1974-75 Fed.Sec.L.Rptr. ¶ 99,934 (S.D.N.Y. 1974); Koenig v. … However, Falcon is distinguishable because there the Title VII plaintiff sought “across the board” certification not only of those who had not been promoted but also of those who had not been hired.

Stephen Merritt v. Barclays PLC

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 10, 2025

See Nguyen v. … See Howard v.

Gardella v. Field

291 F. Supp. 107 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 31, 1968

Fay v. Noia, supra. Once a state prisoner has fully presented his claim to the state courts it is unnecessary for him to exhaust other available state procedures regarding such a claim. Brown v. … See In Re Fields, 62 Cal.2d 900 , 42 Cal.Rptr. 836 , 399 P.2d 372 (1965); In Re Brown, 62 Cal.2d 902 , 42 Cal.Rptr. 838 , 399 P.2d 374 (1965) ; Cf. In Re Jackson, supra.

Marchese v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc.

644 F. Supp. 1381 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 11, 1986

North Haven Board of Education v. … The Grain Futures Act was upheld as a valid exercise of Congress’ commerce power, in Chicago Board of Trade v. Olsen, 262 U.S. 1 , 43 S.Ct. 470 , 67 L.Ed. 839 (1923). 3 .

X. Saint v. California Franchise Tax Board, Malia M. Cohen, Joe Stephenshaw, Money Network Financial, LLC, Fiserv, Inc., Michael P. Lyons, Frank J. Bisignano, and Does 1-100

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 1, 2026

Saint (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against defendants California Franchise Tax Board, Malia M. Cohen, Joe Stephenshaw, Money Network Financial, LLC, Fiserv, Inc., Michael P. Lyons, Frank J. … Omstead v. Dell, Inc., 594 F.3d 1081, 1084 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1423 (9th Cir. 1986)), overruled on other grounds by Langere v.

Seungtae Kim v. BMW Financial Services NA

142 F. Supp. 3d 935 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 30, 2015

Brown, 738 F.2d 1462 , 1468 n. 8 (9th Cir.1984)—it “may not substitute its view of the evidence for that of the jury,” Johnson v. Paradise Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 251 F.3d 1222, 1227 (9th Cir.2001). … V.

Southwest Center for Biological Diversity, California Native Plant Society v. Carroll

182 F. Supp. 2d 944 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 31, 2001

Having considered the parties’ papers briefing the applicability of the Supreme Court’s decision in Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v. … Court issued its final decision, the Supreme Court issued a ruling in the case of Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Department, 532 U.S. 598 , 121 S.Ct. 1835 , 149 L.Ed.2d 855 (2001).

Chavez v. Superior Court of California

194 F. Supp. 2d 1037 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 20, 2002

In the removal order, Judge James noted that petitioner “has made no application for relief from removal,” and petitioner waived his right to appeal to the Immigration Appeals Board. Id. … Maleng v. Cook, 490 U.S. 488, 490-91 , 109 S.Ct. 1923, 1925 , 104 L.Ed.2d 540 (1989) (per curiam) (citing Carafas v.

John Doherty v. MacArthur Group, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 10, 2025

Ecology Inc. v. State of California, 129 Cal. App. 4th 887, 901 (2005); 17 Granadino v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 236 Cal. … Ladas v. California State Auto. Ass'n (1993) 19 Cal.

In re FIDELITY SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'N

53 F.2d 241 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 3, 1931

Bradley v. Washington, etc., Co., 13 Pet. 89 , 10 L. Ed. 72 ; Mauran v. Bullus, 16 Pet. 528 , 10 L. Ed. 1056 ; Chesapeake, etc., Co. v. Hill, 15 Wall. 94 , 21 L. Ed'. 64. … S. v. Choctaw Nation, 179 U. S. 494 , 21 S. Ct. 149 , 45 L. Ed. 291 .

United States v. Lopez

474 F. Supp. 943 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 14, 1979

Perceiving that “crime was afoot,” he continued his search and found a brown bag filled with additional cash. … Under Rakas v.

Blackwell

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 8, 2026

See United States v. Howell, 231 F.3d 615, 621-22 (9th 27 Cir. 2000); Brown v. Roe, 279 F.3d 742, 744-45 (9th Cir. 2002). … See Ascon Props., Inc. v.

Interplay Entertainment Corp. v. Topware Interactive, Inc.

751 F. Supp. 2d 1132 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 2, 2010

Its basic concept is to have computer animated chess pieces carry out a player’s moves by stalking across the chess board to engage in animated combat. … its distributors, Interplay believes that TopWare’s chess video game will have a nearly identical concept as Interplay’s Battle Chess, featuring fantasy-themed animated chess pieces battling to capture squares on a chess board