Case law

Turley v. SELECTIVE SERV. SYSTEM ORANGE CTY., CA., LOCAL BOARD NO. 134

301 F. Supp. 845 · District Court, C.D. California · May 27, 1969

VI In Oestereich v. … Compare Foley v. Hershey, 409 F.2d 827 (7th Cir. April 8, 1969); Bowen v. Hershey, 410 F.2d 962 (1st Cir. Mar. 26, 1969); Carey v. Selective Service Local Board No. 2, 1 Sel.Serv.L.Rep. 3326 (D.Conn.

Consumers Solar Electric Power Corp. v. United States Postal Service

530 F. Supp. 702 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 22, 1982

Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820, 834-35 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1968-69 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976), and eases cited therein. … . § 1331 ); Glines v. Wade, 586 F.2d 675 (9th Cir. 1978), rev’d on other grounds sub nom. Brown v.

Solorio v. Hartley

591 F. Supp. 2d 1127 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 10, 2008

Redd v. McGrath, 343 F.3d 1077, 1079 (9th Cir.2003); Brown v. Barrow, 512 F.3d 1304 , 1307 & n. 1 (11th Cir.2008) (per curiam); Cook v. New York State Div. of Parole, 321 F.3d 274, 280 (2d Cir.2003); Wade v. … Thus, for petitioner, the statute of limitations began to run on July 1, 2007, the day after the Board’s decision became final, and ended on June 30, 2008. Latscha v. Salazar, 2008 WL 5101015 , *2 (C.D.Cal.); Smith v.

Baca v. Moreno Valley Unified School District

936 F. Supp. 718 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 1, 1996

Brown Act (Brown Act). … matter of the legislative body, ...” § 54954.3. 9 The Brown Act applies to school districts and to school boards. §§ 45951, 54952 10 ; see Fraser v.

McCarns v. Dexter

534 F. Supp. 2d 1138 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 28, 2008

Delgado v. Lewis, 223 F.3d 976, 982 (9th Cir.2000); Brown v. Ornoski 503 F.3d 1006, 1010-11 (9th Cir.2007). … Sass, 461 F.3d at 1125-26 ; see also Brown v.

California Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Safeway, Inc.

371 F. Supp. 2d 1179 · District Court, C.D. California · May 25, 2005

See Brown, 518 U.S. at 245 , 116 S.Ct. 2116 (discussing NLRB v. … Throughout this opinion we refer to Brown v. Pro Football, Inc. simply as “Brown.” There is, however, another similarly named, relevant Supreme Gourt opinion. See NLRB v.

MacOm Products Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.

359 F. Supp. 973 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 5, 1973

Brown, supra, defendants contend that they are exempt from antitrust regulation, because they are obliged by state law to file and enforce the challenged tariff. In Parker v. … The court therefore holds that there is insufficient state action here to invoke immunity under Parker v. Brown, supra. in.

Clinton Brown v. Clark R. Taylor

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 15, 2024

See Lucas v. S.C. … See Clinton Brown v. Emil Assentato, No. 23-02972, ECF No. 38 (C.D. Cal.

Christopher Todd Brown v. M. Soto

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 24, 2024

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007).   … Gordon v. Cnty. of Orange, 888 F.3d 1118,  25  1124–25 (9th Cir. 2018) (quoting Castro v. 

Kenyan Darrell Brown v. Arresting Officers

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 19, 2021

Brown v. City of Rialto, et al., Case No. 5:21-cv-00565-RGK-JDE 25 (dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted); 26 2. Brown v. … Brown v.

Clinton Brown v. Clark R. Taylor

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 5, 2023

CV 22-9203 MEMF (KS) Date: December 5, 2023 Title Clinton Brown v. Clark R. Taylor Present: The Honorable: Karen L. … CV 22-9203 MEMF (KS) Date: December 5, 2023 Title Clinton Brown v. Clark R. Taylor Two weeks have now passed since Plaintiff’s deadline to file his opposition.

Kenyan Darrell Brown v. Arresting Officers

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 29, 2021

Brown v. City of Rialto, et al., Case No. 5:21-cv-00565-RGK-JDE 23 (dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted); 24 2. Brown v. … Brown v.

Fields v. Palmdale School District

271 F. Supp. 2d 1217 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 18, 2003

Brown v. Hot. Sexy and Safer Productions, Inc., 68 F.3d 525, 533 (1st Cir.1995). … Brown, 68 F.3d at 534 .

Eric William Brown v. Andrew Saul

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 30, 2021

Orn v. … See Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 495; Bunnell, 336 F.3d at 16 1115-16.

Alicia Marie Richards v. Andre Brown

District Court, C.D. California · May 4, 2023

Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002); see also Moore v. PHH Mortg. Corp., No. 20- 35877, 2021 WL 6103114, at *1 (9th Cir. … (citing Morris v. Morgan Stanley & Co., 942 F.2d 648, 652 (9th Cir. 1991)).

Ramundie O Brown v. Brian Duffy

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 23, 2021

Lindh v. … Brown v. Muniz, 889 F.3d 10 661, 667 (9th Cir. 2018), cert. denied Brown v. Hatton, 139 S. Ct. 841 (2019); see 11 also Magwood v. Patterson, 561 U.S. 320, 332 (2010).

John Christopher Brown v. Josie Gastelo

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 1, 2021

See Coleman v. … See Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30 (1962); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Carey v.

Kenyon Darrell Brown v. Daisy Shim

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 9, 2020

Estelle v. 27 McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 68 (1991); Smith v. … See Stanley v. Cal.

San Francisco Seals, Ltd. v. National Hockey League

379 F. Supp. 966 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 18, 1974

It is managed by a Board of Governors, composed of one representative from each member club. … In Brown Shoe Co. v.

Luis Licea v. Brown Sugar LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 5, 2020

CV 20-6916 FMO (RAOx) Date October 5, 2020 Title Luis Licea v. Brown Sugar, LLC Present: The Honorable Fernando M. … CV 20-6916 FMO (RAOx) Date October 5, 2020 Title Luis Licea v. Brown Sugar, LLC Based on the foregoing, IT |S ORDERED that: 1.