Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca9

10,000+ results

0.85s

  • Anna Lee Brown v. Board of Bar Examiners of the State of Nevada and Board of Governors of the State Bar of Nevada

    623 F.2d 605 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 18, 1980

    Woodard v. *611 Virginia Board of Bar Examiners, supra, 598 F.2d 1345 ; Doe v. Pringle, supra. Relief for Brown’s individual grievance, if any, would be by petition to the United States Supreme Court. Feldman v. … Woodard v.Virginia Board of Bar Examiners, supra; Doe v. Pringle, supra. See Santos v. Alaska Bar Association, supra, at 577.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Brown v. National Labor Relations Board

    462 F.2d 699 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 12, 1972

    In NLRB v. Lindsay Newspapers, Inc., 315 F.2d 709 (5th Cir. 1963), the court listed seventeen factors which supported the Board’s conclusion of employee status. … . *706 In addition, those cases which agree with the Board’s finding of employee status emphasize factors absent here. The court in Herald Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Elmer W. Brown v. Alaska Industrial Board, Alaska Aggregate Corporation and Morrell P. Totten & Company, Inc.

    224 F.2d 680 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 28, 1955

    In this situation it was necessary that the Board make findings of fact on the following: 1) Whether when Brown’s employment terminated his employer continued to operate and if so whether Brown ceased to work on account of … Hormel v. Helvering, 312 U.S. 552, 557 , 61 S.Ct. 719 , 85 L.Ed. 1037 ; N. L. R. B. v. Red Spot Electric Co., 9 Cir., 191 F.2d 697, 699 ; Wayne v. New York Life Ins. Co., 8 Cir., 132 F.2d 28, 37 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Mortuary & Cemetery Board

    144 F. App'x 581 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 16, 2005

    The district court properly dismissed Brown’s claims against the Board in its official capacity because it could not constitute a “person” for the purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 liability. See Will v. … The district court properly dismissed Brown’s claims against the Board officials in their individual capacities under the doctrine of quasi-judicial immunity because Brown’s claims are based on actions undertaken in the Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Douglas Brown v. National Labor Relations Board

    462 F.2d 699 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 12, 1972

    P 12,787 Douglas BROWN et al., Petitioners, v. … The court in Herald Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bowles v. Glick Bros. Lumber Co.

    146 F.2d 566 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 4, 1945

    Thus in Rodgers v. … To similar effect see Fleming v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 7 Cir., 114 F.2d 384 (involving the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S. C.A. § 201 et seq.) ; United States v.

    Cited 76 timesPublished
  • Gerald Von Tobel v. James Benedetti

    975 F.3d 849 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 14, 2020

    VON TOBEL V. … VON TOBEL V.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. Augustinus Petrus Maria Kouwenhoven

    602 F.2d 234 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 15, 1979

    See Scott v. United States, 434 F.2d 11 , 23 (5th Cir. 1970); Bandy v. Willingham, 398 F.2d 333 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1006 , 89 S.Ct. 497 , 21 L.Ed.2d 470 (1968); 18 U.S.C. § 3568 . … United States v. Benz, 282 U.S. 304, 307-309 , 51 S.Ct. 113 , 75 L.Ed. 354 (1931).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Fernando Belmontes, Jr. v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, for the California State Prison at San Quentin

    350 F.3d 861 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 20, 2003

    Buchanan v. … Mickens v.

    Reversed by Brown, Warden v. Belmontes, 544 U.S. 945 (2005)Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Brown v. California Department of Corrections

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 22, 2009

    BACKGROUND Brown’s claims stem from our grant of Brown’s habeas petition in Brown v. Poole, 337 F.3d 1155 (9th Cir. 2003). … Absolute Immunity For Parole Board Decisions By Parole Board Members [4] The district court properly granted summary judgment on Brown’s claims against the parole board members, as parole board members are entitled

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Natural Resources v. Brown

    992 F.2d 937 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 4, 1993

    The Boards thus argue that the Act is a veiled attempt to alter the conditions of the trust, and that such an attempt is prohibited. See ASARCO Inc. v. … See Warth v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Ronald L. Sanders v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, of California State Prison at San Quentin

    373 F.3d 1054 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 8, 2004

    Id. at 470, 24 Cal.Rptr.2d 808 , 862 P.2d 808 (internal quotation marks omitted); see also People v. Brown, 40 Cal.3d 512, 541-45 , 230 Cal.Rptr. 834 , 726 P.2d 516 (1983), reversed on other grounds by California v. … Brown, 479 U.S. 538 , 107 S.Ct. 837 , 93 L.Ed.2d 934 (1987).

    Overruled by Brown v. Sanders, 546 U.S. 212 (2006)Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Kawashima v. Holder

    593 F.3d 979 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 27, 2010

    In I.N.S. v. … See Goldeshtein v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Sida of Hawaii, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    512 F.2d 354 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 24, 1975

    NLRB v. United Insurance Co., 390 U.S. 254, 256 , 88 S.Ct. 988 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1083 (1968). Brown v. NLRB, 462 F.2d 699 , 702 (9th Cir. 1972). … As this court reaffirmed in Brown, we cannot uphold the Board where it has in its “application of the law to the facts overlooked accepted principles of the law of agency . . . .” 462 F.2d at 702, quoting Carnation Co. v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Bankr. L. Rep. P 68,280 in the Matter of Nelson Lewis Gross, AKA Nelson L. Gross, AKA Lewis Gross, Bankrupt. John O. Miller v. Nelson Lewis Gross

    654 F.2d 602 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 24, 1981

    However, this assertion is contrary to the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. … This was the rule in the Ninth Circuit even prior to Brown .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Brown

    310 F.2d 539 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 14, 1962

    For example, Garner, President of the Association, was designated by the Board as “head” shipping clerk of Brown Wholesale. … Wayside Press, Inc. v. N. L. R. B., supra note 7, at 806.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • States Steamship Company, a Corporation v. Permanente Steamship Corporation, a Corporation

    231 F.2d 82 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 6, 1956

    As observed in Oriental Trading & Transport Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp., 2 Cir., 173 F.2d 108 , certiorari denied Gulf Oil Corp. v. M/V The John A. … Brown, 1949, 337 U.S. 919 , 69 S.Ct. 1162 , 93 L.Ed. 1728 : “The purpose of * * * all rules touching signals * * * is to advise the ship to which the signal is addressed that she can no longer rely upon the signalling ship

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v. American Savings & Loan Ass'n

    804 F.2d 1487 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 26, 1986

    Code Cong. & Ad.News at 6086-87, 6298; see Roach, 660 F.2d at 1318 ; Brown v. Pennsylvania State Employees Credit Union (In re Brown) 49 B.R. 558, 561 (Bankr.M.D.Penn.1985). … See Brown, 49 B.R. at 561 (letter from credit union to debtor violated automatic stay when sent directly to debtor rather than to his attorney).

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Mayle

    283 F.3d 1019 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 7, 2002

    Broum v. Mayle a. Brown’s Principal Offense On August 7, 1995, Brown attempted to shoplift a steering wheel alarm worth $25 from a Walgreens store. … See People v. Brown, C023139, at 3 (Cal.Ct.App.1997) (second emphasis added).

    Vacated on other grounds by Mayle, Warden v. Brown, 538 U.S. 901 (2003)Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Gilbert C. Brown v. Joan Palmateer, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary

    379 F.3d 1089 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 17, 2004

    Retroactivity Brown argues that because the Board applied to him the parole statute as amended in 1993, the Board violated his rights. … In postponing Brown’s parole release date, the Board retroactively applied a version of a parole statute enacted after Brown’s crimes to Brown’s detriment.

    Cited 21 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.