Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. MacY's Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 21, 2025

Petitioner, 20-CA-270047 v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, 2 INT’L UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS V. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 (2000) (simplified).

Raley's, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

725 F.2d 1204 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 13, 1984

Oregon Environmental Council v. Kunzman, 714 F.2d 901, 903 (9th Cir.1983); Bumpus v. Clark, 702 F.2d 826, 827 (9th Cir.1983). The Board’s election decision therefore is not moot. … We vacate that portion of the panel’s opinion assuming jurisdiction over the Board’s election decision, overrule Anja Engineering Corp. v.

Idaho Migrant Council v. Board of Education

647 F.2d 69 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 5, 1981

The Idaho legislature has vested specific supervisory functions in the State Board of Education. … See Lau v. Nichols, 414 U.S. 563, 566 , 94 S.Ct. 786, 788 , 39 L.Ed.2d 1 (1974).

Dycus v. National Labor Relations Board

615 F.2d 820 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 22, 1980

No. 172 (1979); American Sunroof/Customcraft, Inc. v. Teamsters Local No. 665, No. C-78-2371 SC (N.D.Cal. May 25, 1979). … That ground and the usual deference that we afford to the Board’s effort to apply federal labor law to a' novel factual setting lead me to concur in the result reached by the court.

Hall v. California State Personnel Board

554 F.2d 1068 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 28, 1977

554 F.2d 1068 Hall v. California State Personnel Board No. 76-1162 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 4/28/77 1 C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED

Canova v. National Labor Relations Board

708 F.2d 1498 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 24, 1983

. § 160 (e) & (f) (1976) requiring deference to Board determinations. This court may freely review determinations of issues of law by the Board. See NLRB v. … Mercier v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, 16 Cal.3d 711 , 129 Cal.Rptr. 161, 164 , 548 P.2d 361, 364 (1976). In Russell v.

Ioane v. California Board of Equalization

19 F. App'x 579 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 20, 2001

and Board of Equalization. … See United States v. Taketa, 923 F.2d 665, 669 (9th Cir.1991) (holding that Fourth Amendment rights are personal rights that cannot be asserted vicariously); see also Rice v.

Brown v. Union Pacific Railway Co.

158 F. App'x 817 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 13, 2005

See Manatt v. Bank of America, 339 F.3d 792, 798 (9th Cir.2003). We decline to consider whether Brown suffered retaliation, because he did not raise the issue in the district court, see Crawford v. … Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925 , 929-30 (9th Cir.2003). Brown’s remaining contentions lack merit. AFFIRMED.

Sass v. California Board of Prison

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 30, 2006

SASS v. … v.

Head v. Merit Systems Protection Board

688 F.2d 846 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 5, 1982

688 F.2d 846 Head v. Merit Systems Protection Board 80-7753 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 8/5/82 1 M.S.P.B. AFFIRMED

State Board of Equalization v. Phipps

538 F.2d 339 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 4, 1976

538 F.2d 339 State Board of Equalization v. Phipps No. 74-1608 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 2/4/76 1 C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED

Horne v. National Labor Relations Board

151 F.2d 336 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 22, 1945

Horne Engineering Company, to review, and the petition of the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its said order, be and each of them hereby is dismissed, without prejudice to the rights of either party to reinstate

National Labor Relations Board v. Thatcher

142 F.2d 459 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 18, 1944

Upon petition of the National Labor Relations Board for entry of a decree enforcing its order herein, respondent consenting to entry of such decree, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered petition granted and decree filed … and entered enforcing the order of the National Labor Relations Board and that a certified copy of such decree be forthwith issued to the respective parties.

National Labor Relations Board v. Morris

138 F.2d 572 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 15, 1943

Upon petition of the National Labor Relations Board, for entry of a decree enforcing its order herein — respondent consenting to entry of such decree — and good cause therefor appearing, ordered petition granted, and decree … filed and entered enforcing the order of the National Labor Relations Board, herein, and that a certified copy of such decree be forthwith issued to the respective parties.

Linda Ekstrom Stanley v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

476 F.3d 653 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 16, 2007

See United States v. … Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569-70 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

National Labor Relations Board v. Avila

673 F.2d 281 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 29, 1982

B. v. … Bank v. N. L. R. B., 651 F.2d 1272, 1275 (9th Cir. 1980). The primary responsibility for making that accommodation rests with the Board. Hudgens, supra, 424 U.S. at 522 , 96 S.Ct. at 1037 .

Hardin v. National Transportation Safety Board

665 F.2d 1052 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 26, 1981

665 F.2d 1052 Hardin v. National Transportation Safety Board 80-7025 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 10/26/81 1 N.T.S.B. AFFIRMED

Swanson v. Arizona Board of Regents

538 F.2d 339 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 24, 1976

538 F.2d 339 Swanson v. Arizona Board of Regents No. 74-3473 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 5/24/76 1 D.Ariz. AFFIRMED

National Labor Relations Board v. Sobel

151 F.2d 1020 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 27, 1945

This cause coming on for hearing on petition of the National Labor Relations Board, filed November 8, 1945, for entry of a decree of this Court enforcing its order herein of November 5, 1945, and it appearing from the transcript … time limited in such order to show cause within which a response may be filed has expired, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that a decree of this Court enforcing the order of the National Labor Relations Board

Mahon v. National Labor Relations Board

808 F.2d 1342 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 26, 1987

We have no warrant to second guess the Board unless it abused its discretion. Servair, Inc. v. NLRB, 726 F.2d 1435, 1438-39 (9th Cir.1984). Douglas Aircraft Co. v. NLRB, 609 F.2d 352, 354 (9th Cir.1979). … The Board, in rejecting the administrative law judge’s decision, held that deferral to the settlement was not repugnant to the Act, citing Olin Corp., 268 NLRB 573 (1984), and Metropolitan Edison Co. v.