Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca9

10,000+ results

1.25s

  • Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Alaska Industrial Board

    191 F.2d 262 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 17, 1951

    The contention is the same as in Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Alaska Industrial Board and Landro, 9 Cir., 191 F.2d 260 . … Steamboat Co. v. Norton, 284 U.S. 408, 414 , 52 S.Ct. 187 , 76 L.Ed. 366 ; Contractors v. Pillsbury, Commissioner, 9 Cir., 150 F.2d 310, 313 ; Thoresen v. Schmahl, 222 Minn. 304 , 24 N.W.2d 273, 276 ; Wilkins v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Hardin v. National Transportation Safety Board

    665 F.2d 1052 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 26, 1981

    665 F.2d 1052 Hardin v. National Transportation Safety Board 80-7025 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 10/26/81 1 N.T.S.B. AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Swanson v. Arizona Board of Regents

    538 F.2d 339 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 24, 1976

    538 F.2d 339 Swanson v. Arizona Board of Regents No. 74-3473 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 5/24/76 1 D.Ariz. AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Sobel

    151 F.2d 1020 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 27, 1945

    This cause coming on for hearing on petition of the National Labor Relations Board, filed November 8, 1945, for entry of a decree of this Court enforcing its order herein of November 5, 1945, and it appearing from the transcript … time limited in such order to show cause within which a response may be filed has expired, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that a decree of this Court enforcing the order of the National Labor Relations Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Lewis

    246 F.2d 886 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 1, 1957

    (See Brown Truck and Trailer Mfg. Co., Inc., 106 N.L.R.B. 999 ). And another when it assumes they would have moved. (This case, - N.L.R.B. -.) In the Brown case about 30 miles of rather open road was involved. … It is perhaps a permissible assumption that the employees in Brown, post, were of a higher skilled and higher paid class than those in California Footwear. . In the Brown caso, the N. L. R.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fugate v. Phoenix Civil Service Board

    791 F.2d 736 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 10, 1986

    The district court granted summary judgment to the Civil Service Board. … Compare Briggs v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Mendenhall v. National Transportation Safety Board

    92 F.3d 871 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 8, 1996

    (“Board”). … See 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (b); Brown v. Sullivan, 916 F.2d 492, 495-96 (9th Cir.1990).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown Crummer Investment Co. v. City of Burbank

    97 F.2d 993 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 24, 1938

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Waldemar J. Gerend v. Railroad Retirement Board

    248 F.2d 357 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 26, 1957

    Petitioner asks this Court to review the proceedings of, and determination by, the Railroad Retirement Board (herein Board) of the annuity awarded petitioner by the Board. … Petitioner “ * * * became thoroughly nauseated * * * ” by Board’s Brief; he accuses the Board of a “ * * * frantic effort to prevent an impartial review of the facts * * and accuses the Board of “ * * * deliberate lies *

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Donald Welch v. Edmund Brown, Jr.

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 3, 2016

    CABALLERO; CHRISTINE WIETLISBACH; PATRICIA LOCK- DAWSON; SAMARA ASHLEY, in their official capacities as members of The Medical Board of California, Defendants-Appellees. 2 WELCH V. … Finally, the panel held that plaintiffs’ privacy claim was foreclosed by Pickup v. Brown, 740 F.3d 1208 (9th Cir. 4 WELCH V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown (Bobby Henry), D'Erizans (Cesar)

    822 F.2d 1096 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 2, 1987

    822 F.2d 1096 U.S. v. Brown (Bobby Henry), D'Erizans (Cesar) NOS. 84-5110, 84-5117 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. JUL 02, 1987 1 Appeal From: C.D.Cal. 2 AFFIRMED.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Englander Co.

    260 F.2d 67 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 10, 1958

    B. v. … Co. v. N. L. R.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Cleto Rivera, Jr. v. Railroad Retirement Board

    262 F.3d 1005 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 28, 2001

    V)). … In arguing that the Board’s October 3 letter implicitly waived the sixty-day limitations period, Rivera relies on Funderburk v. Califano, 432 F.Supp. 657 (W.D.N.C.1977), and Sipple v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Man Hing Ivory and Imports, Inc. v. Brown

    652 F.2d 63 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 26, 1981

    652 F.2d 63 Man Hing Ivory and Imports, Inc. v. Brown 79-4738 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 5/26/81 1 N.D.Cal. VACATED AND REMANDED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kapiolani Hospital v. National Labor Relations Board

    581 F.2d 230 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 31, 1978

    It is well settled, of course, that the findings of the Board must be upheld if supported by substantial evidence, viewing the record as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. … This court cannot displace the Board’s choice between two conflicting views, even though this court would have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo. NLRB v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Raley's, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    725 F.2d 1204 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 13, 1984

    Oregon Environmental Council v. Kunzman, 714 F.2d 901, 903 (9th Cir.1983); Bumpus v. Clark, 702 F.2d 826, 827 (9th Cir.1983). The Board’s election decision therefore is not moot. … We vacate that portion of the panel’s opinion assuming jurisdiction over the Board’s election decision, overrule Anja Engineering Corp. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Dycus v. National Labor Relations Board

    615 F.2d 820 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 22, 1980

    No. 172 (1979); American Sunroof/Customcraft, Inc. v. Teamsters Local No. 665, No. C-78-2371 SC (N.D.Cal. May 25, 1979). … That ground and the usual deference that we afford to the Board’s effort to apply federal labor law to a' novel factual setting lead me to concur in the result reached by the court.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hall v. California State Personnel Board

    554 F.2d 1068 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 28, 1977

    554 F.2d 1068 Hall v. California State Personnel Board No. 76-1162 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 4/28/77 1 C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Harrah's Club

    362 F.2d 425 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 5, 1966

    B. v. Gene Compton’s Corp., 9 Cir., 262 F.2d 653 , 656; N. L. R. B. v. Carpenters Local No. 2133, 9 Cir., 356 F.2d 464 , 465. … It must also be shown that the gambling industry will be substantially prejudiced by Board regulation because racetracks are not similarly regulated. See N. L. R. B. v. Gene Compton’s Corp., supra.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Sass v. California Board of Prison

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 30, 2006

    SASS v. … v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.