Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.25s
Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Alaska Industrial Board
191 F.2d 262 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 17, 1951
The contention is the same as in Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Alaska Industrial Board and Landro, 9 Cir., 191 F.2d 260 . … Steamboat Co. v. Norton, 284 U.S. 408, 414 , 52 S.Ct. 187 , 76 L.Ed. 366 ; Contractors v. Pillsbury, Commissioner, 9 Cir., 150 F.2d 310, 313 ; Thoresen v. Schmahl, 222 Minn. 304 , 24 N.W.2d 273, 276 ; Wilkins v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedHardin v. National Transportation Safety Board
665 F.2d 1052 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 26, 1981
665 F.2d 1052 Hardin v. National Transportation Safety Board 80-7025 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 10/26/81 1 N.T.S.B. AFFIRMED
Cited 0 timesPublishedSwanson v. Arizona Board of Regents
538 F.2d 339 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 24, 1976
538 F.2d 339 Swanson v. Arizona Board of Regents No. 74-3473 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 5/24/76 1 D.Ariz. AFFIRMED
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Sobel
151 F.2d 1020 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 27, 1945
This cause coming on for hearing on petition of the National Labor Relations Board, filed November 8, 1945, for entry of a decree of this Court enforcing its order herein of November 5, 1945, and it appearing from the transcript … time limited in such order to show cause within which a response may be filed has expired, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that a decree of this Court enforcing the order of the National Labor Relations Board
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Lewis
246 F.2d 886 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 1, 1957
(See Brown Truck and Trailer Mfg. Co., Inc., 106 N.L.R.B. 999 ). And another when it assumes they would have moved. (This case, - N.L.R.B. -.) In the Brown case about 30 miles of rather open road was involved. … It is perhaps a permissible assumption that the employees in Brown, post, were of a higher skilled and higher paid class than those in California Footwear. . In the Brown caso, the N. L. R.
Cited 1 timesPublishedFugate v. Phoenix Civil Service Board
791 F.2d 736 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 10, 1986
The district court granted summary judgment to the Civil Service Board. … Compare Briggs v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMendenhall v. National Transportation Safety Board
92 F.3d 871 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 8, 1996
(“Board”). … See 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (b); Brown v. Sullivan, 916 F.2d 492, 495-96 (9th Cir.1990).
Cited 4 timesPublishedBrown Crummer Investment Co. v. City of Burbank
97 F.2d 993 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 24, 1938
Cited 0 timesPublishedWaldemar J. Gerend v. Railroad Retirement Board
248 F.2d 357 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 26, 1957
Petitioner asks this Court to review the proceedings of, and determination by, the Railroad Retirement Board (herein Board) of the annuity awarded petitioner by the Board. … Petitioner “ * * * became thoroughly nauseated * * * ” by Board’s Brief; he accuses the Board of a “ * * * frantic effort to prevent an impartial review of the facts * * and accuses the Board of “ * * * deliberate lies *
Cited 3 timesPublishedDonald Welch v. Edmund Brown, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 3, 2016
CABALLERO; CHRISTINE WIETLISBACH; PATRICIA LOCK- DAWSON; SAMARA ASHLEY, in their official capacities as members of The Medical Board of California, Defendants-Appellees. 2 WELCH V. … Finally, the panel held that plaintiffs’ privacy claim was foreclosed by Pickup v. Brown, 740 F.3d 1208 (9th Cir. 4 WELCH V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Brown (Bobby Henry), D'Erizans (Cesar)
822 F.2d 1096 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 2, 1987
822 F.2d 1096 U.S. v. Brown (Bobby Henry), D'Erizans (Cesar) NOS. 84-5110, 84-5117 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. JUL 02, 1987 1 Appeal From: C.D.Cal. 2 AFFIRMED.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Englander Co.
260 F.2d 67 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 10, 1958
B. v. … Co. v. N. L. R.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCleto Rivera, Jr. v. Railroad Retirement Board
262 F.3d 1005 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 28, 2001
V)). … In arguing that the Board’s October 3 letter implicitly waived the sixty-day limitations period, Rivera relies on Funderburk v. Califano, 432 F.Supp. 657 (W.D.N.C.1977), and Sipple v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedMan Hing Ivory and Imports, Inc. v. Brown
652 F.2d 63 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 26, 1981
652 F.2d 63 Man Hing Ivory and Imports, Inc. v. Brown 79-4738 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 5/26/81 1 N.D.Cal. VACATED AND REMANDED
Cited 0 timesPublishedKapiolani Hospital v. National Labor Relations Board
581 F.2d 230 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 31, 1978
It is well settled, of course, that the findings of the Board must be upheld if supported by substantial evidence, viewing the record as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. … This court cannot displace the Board’s choice between two conflicting views, even though this court would have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo. NLRB v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedRaley's, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
725 F.2d 1204 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 13, 1984
Oregon Environmental Council v. Kunzman, 714 F.2d 901, 903 (9th Cir.1983); Bumpus v. Clark, 702 F.2d 826, 827 (9th Cir.1983). The Board’s election decision therefore is not moot. … We vacate that portion of the panel’s opinion assuming jurisdiction over the Board’s election decision, overrule Anja Engineering Corp. v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedDycus v. National Labor Relations Board
615 F.2d 820 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 22, 1980
No. 172 (1979); American Sunroof/Customcraft, Inc. v. Teamsters Local No. 665, No. C-78-2371 SC (N.D.Cal. May 25, 1979). … That ground and the usual deference that we afford to the Board’s effort to apply federal labor law to a' novel factual setting lead me to concur in the result reached by the court.
Cited 1 timesPublishedHall v. California State Personnel Board
554 F.2d 1068 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 28, 1977
554 F.2d 1068 Hall v. California State Personnel Board No. 76-1162 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 4/28/77 1 C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Harrah's Club
362 F.2d 425 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 5, 1966
B. v. Gene Compton’s Corp., 9 Cir., 262 F.2d 653 , 656; N. L. R. B. v. Carpenters Local No. 2133, 9 Cir., 356 F.2d 464 , 465. … It must also be shown that the gambling industry will be substantially prejudiced by Board regulation because racetracks are not similarly regulated. See N. L. R. B. v. Gene Compton’s Corp., supra.
Cited 9 timesPublishedSass v. California Board of Prison
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 30, 2006
SASS v. … v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna