Case law

Steven Lucas v. National Labor Relations Board

333 F.3d 927 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 16, 2003

However, where the Board rests its decision on a misinterpretation of Supreme Court precedent, we need not give the Board’s interpretation any particular deference. See Jacoby v. … This normally results in the Board’s entering an order against the charged party.”); see also Helton v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Johnson

368 F.2d 549 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 17, 1966

See Fibreboard Paper Products v. … The Board therefore correctly determined that respondents’ failure to acknowledge that agreement was an unfair labor practice. See N.L.R.B. v. Jeffries Banknote Co., 9 Cir., 281 F.2d 893, 896 .

State Board of Equalization v. Harleston

331 F.3d 699 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 5, 2003

See Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 506 U.S. 139, 147 , 113 S.Ct. 684 , 121 L.Ed.2d 605 (1993). We review de novo whether the Board is entitled to sovereign immunity. See Schulman v. Cal. … Gardner v.

Bruce E. McFarland v. Railroad Retirement Board

250 F.2d 668 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 23, 1958

On April 6, 1956, he was instructed by the Board to go to the Palo Alto office of the State Employment Service, which he did on April 9. … The Board’s decision is affirmed. 1 . Under the furlough system once a worker is recalled he has 30 days in which to report for work. 2 .

Federal Home Loan Bank Board v. Elliott

386 F.2d 42 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 18, 1967

Elliott v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, D.C.S.D. Cal., 233 F.Supp. 578 . We first state the underlying facts substantially as set forth in the Board’s brief on this appeal. … See Federal Power Commission v. Idaho Power Co., 344 U.S. 17, 20 , 73 S.Ct. 85 , 97 L.Ed. 15 ; Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. Hirsch, 331 U.S. 752, 767 , 67 S.Ct. 1493 , 91 L.Ed. 1796 ; S.E.C. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Lozano Enterprises

318 F.2d 41 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 8, 1963

Hart Cotton Mills, C.A.4, 1951, 190 F.2d 964 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Jas. H. Matthews & Co., C.A.3, 1946, 156 F.2d 706 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Mt. … National Labor Relations Board v. State Center Warehouse and Cold Storage Co., 9 Cir., 193 F.2d 156 ; National Labor Relations Board v. West Coast Casket Co., 9 Cir., 205 F.2d 902 .

Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Alaska Industrial Board

191 F.2d 260 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 17, 1951

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court affirming an award of partial temporary disability to Landro by the Alaska Industrial Board, hereafter called the Board. … Section 43-3-17, A.C.L.. provides, for cases originating in the Board,, that: “In all proceedings before the Industrial Board or in any court under this; Act the costs shall be awarded and taxed as provided by law in ordinary

Island Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

331 F.2d 207 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 24, 1964

1963, Island Airlines operated among the Hawaiian Islands, indicated above, under authority of the State of Hawaii, but without a federal certificate of convenience and necessity from the appellee, Civil *208 Aeronautics Board … At this point it should be said there is no showing that the Civil Aeronautics Board’s position has anything to do with safety— a function of the Federal Aviation Authority.

National Labor Relations Board v. MacY's Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 21, 2025

Petitioner, 20-CA-270047 v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, 2 INT’L UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS V. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 (2000) (simplified).

California State Legislative Board v. Mineta

328 F.3d 605 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 12, 2003

328 F.3d 605 CALIFORNIA STATE LEGISLATIVE BOARD, United Transportation Union, Petitioner, v. Norman Y. … See United States v.

Motorola, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

199 F.2d 82 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 5, 1953

This matter is before us on petition of Motorola to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board and on the cross prayer of the Board for enforcement. … If this were the whole showing it could not be doubted that the Board’s findings were amply warranted.

Southwest Airways Co. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

196 F.2d 937 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 19, 1952

This is a petition by Southwest Airways Co. to review another aspect of the same Civil Aeronautics Board order of January 17, 1952, involved in Western Air Lines, Inc., v. Civil A. B., 9 Cir., 196 F.2d 933 . … The order of the Board is affirmed.

Idaho Migrant Council v. Board of Education

647 F.2d 69 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 5, 1981

The Idaho legislature has vested specific supervisory functions in the State Board of Education. … See Lau v. Nichols, 414 U.S. 563, 566 , 94 S.Ct. 786, 788 , 39 L.Ed.2d 1 (1974).

Airport Parking Management v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Airport Parking Management

720 F.2d 610 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 8, 1983

See NLRB v. … However, because the Board must act in the public interest to enforce public rights, National Licorice Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Robertson Industries

560 F.2d 396 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 4, 1976

NLRB v. Washington Aluminum Co., supra; First National Bank of Omaha v. NLRB, 413 F.2d 921 (8th Cir. 1969); Electromec Design & Development Co. v. NLRB, supra. … Co. v. NLRB, supra, 497 F.2d at 1203 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Western Drug

600 F.2d 1324 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 18, 1979

A more difficult problem is presented by the Board’s remedial order which requires Western to bargain with the Union. Under NLRB v. … delay will produce a new set of facts, as to which the Board must then readjudicate.” with NLRB v.

Ioane v. California Board of Equalization

19 F. App'x 579 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 20, 2001

and Board of Equalization. … See United States v. Taketa, 923 F.2d 665, 669 (9th Cir.1991) (holding that Fourth Amendment rights are personal rights that cannot be asserted vicariously); see also Rice v.

Stanley Hagendorf v. David A. Brown, Martin W. Basiszta

707 F.2d 1018 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 6, 1983

Brown did not need a wining claim to be able to invoke the privilege, see, e.g., Albertson v. Raboff, 46 Cal.2d 375 , 295 P.2d 405, 409, 410 (Cal.1956), and it was not our intention to imply that he had one. … Herzog v. “A” Company, Inc., 138 Cal.App.3d 656 , 188 Cal.Rptr. 155, 158 (App.1982). We found it necessary to respond to Hagendorf’s argument that Brown had no copyright and no colorable copyright claim.

Dhx, Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 30, 2007

Keats, Deputy General Counsel, Surface Transporta- tion Board, Washington, D.C., (argued and on the brief);  DHX, INC. v. STB 10971 Ellen D. … See Fox v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Servette, Inc.

313 F.2d 67 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 28, 1962

B. v. Brown-Dunkin Co., Inc., 287 F.2d 17 (10th Cir., 1961), cited by Petitioner. … B. v. Houston Chronicle Pub.