Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca9

10,000+ results

1.30s

  • Xiao Ma v. Jefferson Sessions, III

    907 F.3d 1191 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 2, 2018

    . § 274a.12(b)(20) does not confer lawful immigration status for purposes of establishing eligibility for status adjustment under 8 U.S.C. § 1255(k)(2). … Accordingly, the BIA concluded that Ma was without lawful status from August 5, 2006 to July 2, 2007, a period of over 180 days, which precluded Ma from establishing his eligibility for adjustment of status.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Sonoco Products Company v. National Labor Relations Board

    399 F.2d 835 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 7, 1968

    I have letters in my office dating back to August, 1965, concerning the establishment of this program. … In combination with Hughes’ statement that Mendonca expressed fear as a result of the subsequent telephone calls, they clearly provide such justification.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Zeinali v. Raytheon Co.

    636 F.3d 544 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 4, 2011

    Raytheon’s approach would essentially immunize government contractors from any liability in cases involving employees whose security clearances are revoked or denied. … The parties contest whether Zeinali was qualified for his position and whether the circumstances of Raytheon’s ter- mination suggest a discriminatory motive.

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Gaines v. City of Phoenix

    116 F.3d 484 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 9, 1997

    At the very least, he was required under clearly established federal law to conduct an inquiry into whether such an order existed, and, if so, what legal effect it had. See id. … immunity.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Olivas-Motta v. Holder

    746 F.3d 907 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 17, 2013

    Silvar-Trevino establishes a three-step analysis. At the first step, applying Taylor v. … The Attorney General’s new definition conflicts with a clear and long-established definition of “conviction.”

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Leslie Feldman v. Arizona Sec'y of State's Ofc.

    842 F.3d 613 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 2, 2016

    For the reasons discussed below, the district court’s factual determination that this evidence failed to establish the requisite link was not clearly erroneous. … As such, it was not clearly erroneous for the district court to conclude that Feldman failed to establish that this Gingles factor turned in her favor.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Frank S. Watts and Barbara M. Watts v. United States

    703 F.2d 346 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 27, 1983

    Commissioner, 72 T.C. 715, 719-720 (1979), upon which Watts relies, clearly demonstrates. … This court agreed that the company’s plan, as a profit-sharing, qualified for tax treatment under § 401.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Carrillo-Jaime v. Holder

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 15, 2009

    A violation of § 10801 clearly satisfies the first and third elements of “theft offense” under § 1101(a)(43)(G). [2] The first element is “exercise of control over property.” … Code § 10801 does not categorically qualify as a theft offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 3, 2026

    Chronic cadmium exposure causes cancers, birth defects, and adverse effects on growth, reproduction, immune and endocrine functions, development, and behavior in aquatic species. … Cadmium is acutely toxic and chronic exposure harms aquatic species’ growth, reproduction, immune and endocrine functions, development, and behavior.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Phillip Lemons v. Bill Bradbury

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 13, 2008

    BRADBURY standard, nor do they prove that the district court was clearly erroneous in finding that “overall we have a fairly coherent set of results.” … After all, the fact that the same name appeared on both petitions does not establish that both signatures matched the voter registration card.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Jorge Aguilera-Rios

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 29, 2014

    The Court therefore held that “to qualify as an aggravated felony, a conviction . . . must necessarily establish” “the presence . . . of certain factors that are not themselves elements of the crime.” Id. … [i]nstead, the burden is on the defendant to show that he qualifies” for misdemeanor treatment under § 841(b)(4). 133 S. Ct. at 1688.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stanley D. Cochran Dean Anderson v. City of Los Angeles

    222 F.3d 1195 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 17, 2000

    City of Los Angeles, 147 F.3d 867, 875 (9th Cir.1998) (“Mere threats and harsh words are insufficient [to establish adverse employment action].”); Gini v. Las Vegas Metro. … Appellees did not appeal the denial of qualified immunity and we do not address the objective reasonableness of the employer’s action.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Sierra Club, a California Non-Profit Corporation v. Union Oil Company of California, a California Corporation, Defendants

    813 F.2d 1480 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 3, 1987

    Implemented provisions must, however, establish requirements at least as stringent as the corresponding listed provisions. … The regulations at 40 C.F.R. §§ 122.41 (j) and (k) establish numerous requirements for self-monitoring and reporting.

    Vacated on other grounds by Fina Oil & Chemical Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co., 485 U.S. 930 (1988)Cited 60 timesPublished
  • Glenda KLEEMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee

    125 F.3d 725 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 8, 1997

    homicidio [simple].’ ” After Kleemaris transfer hearing, Commission examiners found that they agreed as to the following: (1) Kleemaris offense of conviction in Mexico was most analogous to second degree murder; (2) she qualified … The evidence does not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that Kleeman formed, or could have formed, the intent to kill Scott necessary to establish malice, and the Commission’s findings do not support that conclusion.

    Overruled on other grounds by Shakur v. Schriro, 514 F.3d 878 (2008)Cited 14 timesPublished
  • 389 Orange Street Partners v. Arnold

    179 F.3d 656 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 22, 1999

    Both Connecticut’s negligence and general tort statutes of limitation had run unless Robinson can establish an exception. … The legal memorandum in opposition says nothing about the cross-claims qualifying as affirmative defenses.

    Cited 752 timesPublished
  • Jinro America Inc. v. Secure Investments, Inc.

    266 F.3d 993 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 5, 2001

    App. at 496 ("We are now talking about an attack upon an apparently integrated document which establishes that the instrument is a sham and not what it purports to be at all."). … [I]n order to qualify as "scientific knowledge," an inference or assertion must be derived by the scientific method.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Skokomish Indian Tribe v. E. L. France, Trustee

    320 F.2d 205 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 27, 1963

    This rule was established in the early case of United States v. … Elmendorf, a well qualified expert in the field of ethnology or cultural anthropology, who did considerable discriminating research among the Skoko-mish Indians. But Dr.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Bates

    127 F.3d 839 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 7, 1997

    The fact that Bates’ campaign committee contributed a minute fraction of the costs of the Eu litigation fails to establish privity. … This finding is not clearly erroneous. See Sorosky v. Burroughs Corp., 826 F.2d 794, 805 (9th Cir.1987).

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Drew v. Scribner

    252 F. App'x 815 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 30, 2007

    The trial court also found Drew had a prior conviction that qualified as a “strike” under CaLPenal Code §§ 667(a) and 667(b)-(i). Drew was sentenced to an aggregate prison term of 51 years. … Thus, the California Court of Appeal’s denial of Drew’s state habeas petition was not contrary to, nor did it involve an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court of the

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.