Case law

Hayes Spray Gun Co. v. E. C. Brown Co.

291 F.2d 319 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 25, 1961

This rejection was affirmed by the Patent Office Board of Appeals on April 20, 1942. … Godfrey v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Catalina Yachts

679 F.2d 180 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 8, 1982

N.L.R.B. v. Smith & Wesson, 424 F.2d 1072, 1073 (1st Cir. 1970), quoted in N.L.R.B. v. Bedford Discounters, Inc., 484 F.2d 923 (1st Cir. 1973). The petition of the Board is granted. The Board’s order is enforced. … Because Catalina Yachts refused to follow the Board’s decision, the Board was forced to petition this court for enforcement of its decision. In N.L.R.B. v. Smith & Wesson, 424 F.2d at 1073 , and N.L.R.B. v.

Brown v. Attorney General of California

292 F. App'x 674 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 11, 2008

Strickland, v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). … Bell v. Cone, 535 U.S. 685, 699 , 122 S.Ct. 1843 , 152 L.Ed.2d 914 (2002).

Lozano Enterprises v. National Labor Relations Board

327 F.2d 814 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 24, 1964

B. v. … B. v. Nesen, 9 Cir., 1954, 211 F.2d 559, 563-64 ; N. L. R. B. v.

United States v. Kevin Lamar Brown

15 F.3d 1090 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 17, 1993

Jackson v. … See California v.

Howell v. State Board of Equalization

731 F.2d 624 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 19, 1984

Diamond National v. State Board of Equalization, 425 U.S. 268 , 96 S.Ct. 1530 , 47 L.Ed.2d 780 (1976); United States v. … California State Board of Equalization, 650 F.2d 1127 (9th Cir.1981), aff’d, 456 U.S. 901 , 102 S.Ct. 1744 , 72 L.Ed.2d 157 (1982); United States v. State Board of Equalization, 536 F.2d 294 (9th Cir.1976). .

Wells, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

162 F.2d 457 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 17, 1947

The Board believed that this attitude afforded the only rational explanation for Benton’s discharge. … N.L.R.B. v. Air Associates, Inc., 2 Cir., 121 F.2d 586 ; N.L.R.B. v. Skinner & Kennedy Stationery Co., 8 Cir., 113 F.2d 667 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Rico

182 F.2d 254 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 24, 1950

This matter is before us on the return of a rule directing respondent to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of the decree of the Court enforcing an order of the National Labor Relations Board. … He is nevertheless ordered to pay a sum, not in excess of $100, to defray the expense incurred by the Board in its endeavor to persuade him to take action in conformity with the decree, this sum to be paid to the Clerk of

Island Airlines, Incorporated, V, Civil Aeronautics Board

363 F.2d 120 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 8, 1966

Civil Aeronautics Board, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 220 , 195 F.2d 206 (1952); American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 365 , 231 F.2d 483 (1956). … American Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 98 U.S.App. D.C. 348, 235 F.2d 845 (1956); Pan American World Airways v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 261 F.2d 754 (D.C.Cir. 1958).

National Labor Relations Board v. Harrah's Club

403 F.2d 865 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 12, 1968

Whether the Board should have reopened the record on respondent’s motion following this court’s decision in the prior case of NLRB v. … The propriety of the consideration by the Trial Examiner and the Board of the findings in the prior case of NLRB v.

Stanley Hagendorf v. David A. Brown, Martin W. Basiszta

699 F.2d 478 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 15, 1983

Larmour v. Campanale, 96 Cal.App.3d 566, 568 , 158 Cal.Rptr. 143 (1979) . … Brown’s article was protected by copyright. By registering before the fall of 1983, he could sue for infringement. The privilege extends to communications preliminary to a judicial proceeding. Lerette v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Swift & Company

240 F.2d 65 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 7, 1957

are satisfied that the Board’s appraisal of the activities in question is well grounded. … B. v. Osbrink, 1954, 218 F.2d 341, 344 , and N. L. R. B. v. Parma Water Lifter Co., 1954, 211 F.2d 258, 261 . A decree enforcing the Board’s order will accordingly be entered. 1 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Hank Westphal

859 F.2d 818 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 21, 1988

See Federal Trade Comm’n v. TRW, Inc., 628 F.2d 207 , 210 n. 3 (D.C.Cir.1980). 1 Westphal’s reliance on Becker v. United States, 451 U.S. 1306 , 101 S.Ct. 3161 , 68 L.Ed.2d 828 (1981) is misplaced. … The only authority supporting Westphal’s position is United States v. Neve, 80 F.R.D. 461 (E.D.La.1978), which we do not find persuasive.

California State Board of Equalization v. Goggin

191 F.2d 726 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 26, 1951

Los Angeles City High School District v. State Board of Equalization, 1945, 71 Cal.App. 2d 486 , 163 P.2d 45, 47 , referring to our opinion in State Board of Equalization v. *730 Boteler, supra. … State Board of Equalization, 1944, 62 Cal.App.2d 463 , 145 P.2d 90 ; People v. Thomas, 1940, 37 Cal.App.2d 155 , 99 P.2d 294 ; Banken v. State Board of Equalization, 1947, 79 Cal.App.2d 572 , 180 P.2d 400 .

Carnation Company v. National Labor Relations Board

429 F.2d 1130 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 12, 1970

See NLRB v. United Insurance Co., 390 U.S. at 256 , 88 S.Ct. 988 . The Board doubly errs in this ease. … B. v. Tulsa Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 367 F.2d 55, 59 (10th Cir. 1966). See, also, J. I. Case Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 321 U. S. 332 , 64 S.Ct. 576 , 88 L.Ed. 762 (1944).

Baffert v. California Horse Racing Board

332 F.3d 613 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 6, 2003

See Gibson v. … See Aiona v.

Lozano Enterprises v. National Labor Relations Board

357 F.2d 500 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 3, 1966

If not, it is our duty to set aside and refuse enforcement of the order of the Board. NLRB v. Florida Steel Corp., 308 F.2d 931 (5th Cir. 1962), Universal Camera Corp. v. … B. v. Nabors, supra [5 Cir., 196 F.2d 272 ]; N. L. R. B. v. National Paper Co., supra [5 Cir., 216 F.2d 859 ]; N. L. R. B. v. Blue Bell, Inc., supra [5 Cir., 219 F.2d 796 ]; N. L. R. B. v. C. & J.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott Douglas LACY, Defendant-Appellant

119 F.3d 742 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 10, 1997

BROWNING, Circuit Judge. Scott Douglas Lacy appeals his conviction for possessing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252 (a)(4)(B). We affirm. I. … The United States Customs Service was informed that child pornography from a Danish computer bulletin board system called BAMSE was being brought into the United States by computer.

Island Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

352 F.2d 735 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 29, 1965

Island Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 331 F.2d 207 (9th Cir. 1964). … Ocean Industries, Inc. v. Superior Court, 200 Cal. 235 , 252 P. 722 (1927); Ocean Industries, Inc. v. Greene, 15 F.2d 862 (N.D.Cal.1926) (Monterey Bay). People v.

British Auto Parts, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Teledyne, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

405 F.2d 1182 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 17, 1968

B. v. Hanes Hosiery Division, 384 F.2d 188 (4 Cir. 1967), cert. denied 390 U.S. 950 , 88 S.Ct. 1041 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1141 , and N. L. R. B. v. Rohlen, 385 F.2d 52 (7 Cir. 1967). … This attack is predicated on the holding in Wyman-Gordon Co. v. N. L. R.