Case law

Joseph E. Curlott, and Cross-Appellants v. Alan Campbell, and Cross-Appellees

598 F.2d 1175 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 18, 1979

See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569-70 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … See Pickus v. United States Board of Parole, 177 U.S.App.D.C. 93, 97-98 , 543 F.2d 240, 244-45 (1976). In mandating the procedural due process proceedings, the district court relied mainly on Thompson v.

State Board of Equalization v. Stood

500 F.2d 1208 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 29, 1974

Appellants cite Ruhter v. … The situation is similar to that in United States v.

Brown Company, Brown Company, Livingston Graham Division, Tri-State Concrete Division, L-T Transport, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Borum (Kris A.)

833 F.2d 1015 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 6, 1987

(BNA) 2223 Brown Company, Brown Company, Livingston Graham Division, Tri-State Concrete Division, L-T Transport, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Borum (Kris A.)

United States v. Eddie Brown, United States of America v. Horace Lewis Brown, United States of America v. Patricia Knight

770 F.2d 768 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 3, 1985

Horace Brown (Counts I, III, and V only) and Patricia Knight (Counts I and V only) were tried and convicted with Eddie Brown. Lorraine Getchaway remains a fugitive. I. DENIAL OF REQUESTS FOR PSYCHIATRIC EXAMINATIONS. … Brown’s argument relies entirely upon United States v. Zemater, 501 F.2d 540 (7th Cir. 1974) (per curiam).

National Labor Relations Board v. Sellers

346 F.2d 625 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 8, 1965

B. v. Pittsburgh S.S. … Salinas Valley Broadcasting Corporation v. N. L. R. B., 334 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1964).

Arizona Students' Ass'n v. Arizona Board of Regents

824 F.3d 858 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 1, 2016

No. 2:13-cv-00306-JWS v. ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, OPINION Defendant-Appellee. … From 1974 through 1998, ABOR, a state board whose members are appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Arizona State Senate, directly funded the ASA. In 1998,  ARIZ. STUDENTS’ ASS’N V. ARIZ. BD.

National Labor Relations Board v. Anderson

206 F.2d 409 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 2, 1953

Respondents’ quarrel with the trial examiner and the Board relates mainly to questions of credibility, which the courts do not normally undertake to resolve. Cf. Motorola v. N. L. R. B., 9 Cir., 199 F.2d 82 ; N. L. R. … B. v. State Center Warehouse, 9 Cir., 193 F.2d 156 . And while it is arguable that some of respond *410 ents’ statements are protected, others — incontrovertibly established — are clearly not.

National Labor Relations Board v. Ferguson

118 F.2d 892 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 11, 1941

The Board seeks to secure such a decree from us, though the Brotherhood is not a party to the proceeding here and is not sought by the Board to be made a party. … National Labor Relations Board v. Sterling Electric Motors, Inc., 9 Cir., 109 F.2d 194 ; Id., 9 Cir., 112 F.2d 63, 64 ; Id., 9 Cir., 114 F.2d 738 .

Hason v. Medical Board

234 F. App'x 513 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 11, 2007

We review de novo, Walton v. U.S. Marshals Serv., 476 F.3d 723 , 727 (9th Cir.2007) (summary judgment); Deveraturda v. Globe Aviation Sec. … The district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of the Medical Board because Dr.

Servair, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Servair, Inc.

726 F.2d 1435 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 28, 1984

In making its deferral decision, the Board is required to accommodate two competing statutory objectives. N.L.R.B. v. … Our review of the Board’s deferral *1439 decision is limited to determining whether the Board has abused its discretion. Hawaiian Hauling Service, Ltd. v.

Department & Specialty Store Employees' Union, Local 1265 v. Brown

284 F.2d 619 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 15, 1960

While the Board may not enlarge its authority beyond the scope intended by Congress, N. L. R. B. v. … Brown “Gerald A. Brown “Regional Director” . hereinafter called “Board” . hereinafter called “Act” . hereinafter called “Kinney” .

Gerald A. Brown v. Pacific Telephone And Telegraph Company

218 F.2d 542 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 27, 1955

BROWN, Regional Director of the Twentieth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Appellant, v. … In this the Board's designation of the unit differs from its determination of the majority control of a union. As to the latter, the Board in Celanese Corp. v.

Hayes Spray Gun Co. v. E. C. Brown Co.

291 F.2d 319 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 25, 1961

This rejection was affirmed by the Patent Office Board of Appeals on April 20, 1942. … Godfrey v.

United States v. Antwan E. Brown

73 F.3d 370 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 29, 1995

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antwan E. BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30129. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1995. * Decided Dec. 29, 1995. … United States v. Eaton, 31 F.3d 789, 792 (9th Cir.1994).

Hason v. Medical Board of California

294 F.3d 1166 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 26, 2002

Island Airlines, Incorporated, V, Civil Aeronautics Board

363 F.2d 120 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 8, 1966

Civil Aeronautics Board, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 220 , 195 F.2d 206 (1952); American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 365 , 231 F.2d 483 (1956). … American Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 98 U.S.App. D.C. 348, 235 F.2d 845 (1956); Pan American World Airways v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 261 F.2d 754 (D.C.Cir. 1958).

United States v. Randy Lamont Patterson AKA Randy Brown, Marcus Wayne Edmundson, Tony Burton, Don Grogans, and Billy Ray Brown

819 F.2d 1495 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 15, 1987

In United States v. … Such evidence is inadmissible as to defendants Randy Brown [Patterson], Billy Ray Brown and Donald Grogans. 2 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Harrah's Club

403 F.2d 865 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 12, 1968

Whether the Board should have reopened the record on respondent’s motion following this court’s decision in the prior case of NLRB v. … The propriety of the consideration by the Trial Examiner and the Board of the findings in the prior case of NLRB v.

Brown v. California Department of Corrections

293 F. App'x 511 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 18, 2008

The district court properly held that the parole board members were entitled to absolute immunity. See Bermudez v. … The district court correctly held that the California Department of Corrections and the California Board of Prison Terms were entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity. See Dittman v.

Brown v. Attorney General of California

292 F. App'x 674 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 11, 2008

Strickland, v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). … Bell v. Cone, 535 U.S. 685, 699 , 122 S.Ct. 1843 , 152 L.Ed.2d 914 (2002).