Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca9

10,000+ results

0.32s

  • Ferguson v. Greater Pocatello Chamber Of Commerce, Inc.

    848 F.2d 976 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 6, 1988

    The Fergusons have presented no evidence that ISU would not have given the lease to them--or any other qualified competitor of Chamber and Journal--if they had been the highest bidder. … Although sparse, these indications of interstate commerce are not so deficient and clearly incurable as to warrant sua sponte dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction at this stage of the proceedings.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • John Riach and Maude M. Riach, His Wife v. William E. Frank, District Director of Internal Revenue

    302 F.2d 374 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 13, 1962

    The court further stated that the preponderance of the evidence clearly established that the elevator was installed to mitigate the aggravation of the arthritic condition. … It follows that the balance, or $500, qualifies for medical deduction.”

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • United States v. Valenzuela-Hernandez

    72 F. App'x 686 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 18, 2003

    Consequently, we remand for re-sentencing to allow the district court to review the existing record and any state court *687 documents that may be obtained in order to determine whether Valenzuela-Hemandez’s prior conviction qualifies … Rivera-Sanchez, 247 F.3d 905, 908-09 (9th Cir.2001) (en banc) (stating that when the statute is broader than the generic definition, the court should examine other documents or judicially noticeable facts that clearly establish

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wayne Myron Bishop v. United States

    412 F.2d 1064 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 19, 1969

    Moreover, we agree that one need not be a “saint” in order to qualify as a conscientious objector. … One seeking exemption from military service bears the burden of establishing his entitlement to a particular exemption; hence, we have repeatedly emphasized that a registrant does not sufficiently establish a valid claim

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Appellant, v. UNION BANK, a Corporation, Appellee

    408 F.2d 867 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 13, 1969

    Since appellee qualifies as an “employer” within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(b) (Supp. … And Senator Case, who was the Republican floor manager of the bill, noted: Clearly, under the ■ mechanics of the bill in the form with which the leadership is concerned, more concern or more deference could not be given to

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Scott Nordstrom v. Charles Ryan

    856 F.3d 1265 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 18, 2017

    . 2003) (holding that a panel may depart from the law of the circuit when “the relevant court of last resort . . . undercut the theory or reasoning underlying the prior circuit precedent in such a way that the cases are clearly … ADC’s legal mail policy does not meet this standard because it requires that prison officials “verify that [the letter’s] contents qualify as legal mail.” III.

    Cited 69 timesPublished
  • James Warren v. Chris Wyant

    563 F. App'x 576 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 17, 2014

    Officer Wyant may be entitled to qualified immunity. 4 In her motion for summary judgment, Officer Wyant argued that she is entitled to qualified immunity. … The district court granted her summary judgment motion on other grounds and did not reach the qualified immunity question.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Ocampo v. Vail

    649 F.3d 1098 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 9, 2011

    It succeeded as to the first but, for that very reason, failed under clearly established Supreme Court law as to the second. … [16] The Washington Court of Appeals unreasonably applied clearly established Supreme Court Confrontation Clause jurisprudence to the facts of this case.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Shotgun Delivery, Inc. v. United States

    269 F.3d 969 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 16, 2001

    Variable Reimbursement The district court concluded that Shotgun had failed to establish an adequate business connection for its reimbursement payments. 85 F.Supp.2d at 965 . … The business connection requirement here at issue is clearly substantive, as it enforces the fundamental distinction between taxable compensation and tax-exempt reimbursement which underpins this entire aspect of the tax

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Pezzani

    35 F.3d 1407 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 15, 1994

    We therefore affirm the district court’s conclusion that all defendants except Deloitte were immunized from section 11 liability for errors in the 1987 financial statements. 2. … Under the correct inquiry, summary judgment was clearly inappropriate in this case.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Arthur L. Hollis

    490 F.3d 1149 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 20, 2007

    Yet, as we noted in Shaw , Congress clearly intended to make a distinction between powder cocaine and the more potent and addictive form of smokeable “cocaine base” known as “crack” or “rock” cocaine. … The district court committed no error in finding that Hollis’s prior conviction qualified as a felony drug offense. AFFIRMED. 1 .

    Abrogated on other grounds by DePierre v. United States, 131 S. Ct. 2225 (2011)Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Robert Ybarra, Jr. v. Timothy Filson

    869 F.3d 1016 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 1, 2017

    Under AEDPA, a federal court must defer to a state court’s adjudication of a claim unless it “(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as … When we conducted our review, we first assumed that the unexplained order qualified as an adjudication on the merits. Cannedy, 706 F.3d at 1156 (citing Ylst, 501 U.S. at 803).

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • John Doe I, Jane Doe, and John Doe II 1 v. Richard Burton, Commissioner, Alaska Department of Public Safety Bruce M. Botelho, Alaska Attorney General

    85 F.3d 635 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 13, 1996

    United States, 431 U.S. 651, 659 (1977) (nature of double jeopardy claim is separable from issue of accused's guilt); Mitchell, 472 U.S. at 527 ("claim of qualified immunity is conceptually distinct from the merits of the … All it need determine is a question of law: whether the legal norms allegedly violated by the defendant were clearly established at the time of the challenged actions ...

    Cited 2 timesUnpublished
  • Monte Hoisington v. Robin Williams

    499 F. App'x 693 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 28, 2012

    Ct. 1510 (2012), no precedent clearly -3- establishes the scope of a civilly-committed sex offender’s Fourth Amendment and substantive due process rights in the circumstances … We conclude, therefore, that Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity on the claim for monetary damages; accordingly, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendants on that claim.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Skokomish Indian v. Tacoma Public Utilities

    401 F.3d 979 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 8, 2005

    No special immunity premised on sovereignty as such is claimed. … Ordinarily, whether a case is cognizable under § 1983 does not turn pn whether the rights are well-established or not, although qualified immunity does -turn upon that consideration. See Saucier v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mukhtar v. California State University

    319 F.3d 1073 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 12, 2003

    The panel refused to consider whether the testimony qualified under Daubert v. … Here, the facts regarding the district court’s decision-making process clearly warranted such a resolution.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lin v. Gonzales

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 8, 2007

    GONZALES the amendment establishes eligibility for asylum under two categories relevant to this case. … [3] This case clearly involves a coercive population control program. Birth control officials informed Lin’s brother that he had to be sterilized.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hendricks v. Calderon

    70 F.3d 1032 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 1, 1995

    District court fact findings are accepted unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. at 1451-52 . … At most, these cases establish a duty to seek out psychiatric evaluation of a client where the grounds of a mental defense are apparent, a duty Berman clearly discharged.

    Cited 281 timesPublished
  • Salgado-Diaz v. Ashcroft

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 31, 2005

    Clearly, Salgado-Diaz’s arrest and expulsion had a prejudicial impact on his underlying immigra- tion proceedings. … The INS is correct that petitioner would not qualify for relief under IIRIRA’s rules, which took effect in April 1997. At the SALGADO-DIAZ v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Palakiko v. Harper, Warden of Oahu Prison

    209 F.2d 75 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 10, 1953

    We cannot say that the Territorial Supreme Court findings with respect to the voluntary character of Palakiko’s confession are clearly erroneous. … The connection of the two defendants with the crime was established through their possession of sundry articles stolen at or near the scene of the crime.

    Cited 43 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.