Case law

Brown v. Sprint United Management

136 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 7, 2005

Under Nevada law, an at-will employee has no cognizable “bad faith” discharge claim, and Brown did not carry his burden to show his discharge violated Nevada public policy. See Allum v. … See Abogados v. AT&T, Inc., 223 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir.2000). The district court did not err by declining to award Brown additional incentive compensation.

National Labor Relations Board v. Martin

207 F.2d 655 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 19, 1953

Katz v. N. L. R. B., 9 Cir., 196 F.2d 411, 415 . The court in that case cited with approval Cusano v. N. L. R. … Except as noted herein, a decree will be entered enforcing the Board’s order as prayed. 1 . They cite, also, Indiana Metal Products Corp. v. N. L. R.

Aurora Pump Co. v. Mel Brown Co

698 F.2d 1228 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 15, 1982

698 F.2d 1228 Aurora Pump Co. v. Mel Brown Co. 81-3692 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 12/15/82 D.Idaho AFFIRMED

Brown v. Puget Sound Electrical Apprenticeship & Training Trust

732 F.2d 726 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 3, 1984

In Krenzer v. Ford, 429 F.Supp. 499, 502 (D.D.C.1977), the facts showed that the Administrator of the Veterans Administration would submit only veterans’ names for appointment to the Board of Veterans Appeals. … In Woody v.

Anthony v. National Labor Relations Board

132 F.2d 620 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 31, 1942

National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 309 U.S. 350, 363 , 60 S.Ct. 569 , 84 L.Ed. 799 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … American Potash & Chemical Corp., 9 Cir., 113 F.2d 232, 235 , 129 A.L.R. 874 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Sunshine Mining Co., 9 Cir., 125 F.2d 757, 761 . The petition is denied.

Ivey v. Board of Regents

673 F.2d 260 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 29, 1982

Named defendants include the Board of Regents of the University of Alaska, the Alaska Commission on Postsecondary Education, the Inupiat Council on Postsecondary education, the North Slope Borough (a county-type municipal … Johnson v. Wells, 566 F.2d 1016 (5th Cir. 1978); Kennedy v. H & M Landing, Inc., 529 F.2d 987 (9th Cir. 1976). See also Keker v. Procunier, 398 F.Supp. 756, 766 (E.D.Cal.1975).

Brown (Orville G.) v. Bowen (Otis R.)

822 F.2d 1096 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 6, 1987

822 F.2d 1096 Brown (Orville G.) v. Bowen (Otis R.) NO. 86-3846 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. JUL 06, 1987 1 Appeal From: D.Or. 2 REMANDED.

Brown Co. v. N. L. R. B

663 F.2d 1078 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 2, 1981

(BNA) 2663 Brown Co. v. N. L. R. B. 79-7380, 79-7475 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 9/2/81 1 N.L.R.B. 2 PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED AND CROSS-APPLICATION DENIED; REMANDED

Hunter v. National Mediation Board

754 F.2d 1496 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 5, 1985

Brown.” See Railroad Yardmasters v. Harris, 721 F.2d 1332, 1335 (D.C.Cir.1983). Such a delegation is authorized by 45 U.S.C. § 154 Fourth. … The NMB regulation is consistent with time bars used by the National Labor Relations Board and the Federal Labor Relations Authority. See, e.g., NLRB v.

Friend v. Granat Bros. Granat Bros. v. Friend Brown v. Granat Bros. Granat Bros. v. Brown

184 F.2d 684 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 25, 1950

United States v. Pablo Ponce-Rodriguez

963 F.2d 381 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 13, 1992

Brown v. Darcy, 783 F.2d 1389, 1391 (9th Cir.1986). Here, the government threatened to use the results not to establish the truth or falsity of statements but rather to impeach a witness. … See United States v.

Leda Anderson, a Married Person v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior

230 F.3d 1158 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 30, 2000

See, e.g., Cassim v. … Rabkin v. Bowles, 143 F.2d 600, 601 (9th Cir.1944); see also United States v.

Brown v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance

93 F. App'x 143 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 17, 2004

See Montrose Chemical Co. v. Super. Ct., 6 Cal.4th 287, 296 , 24 Cal.Rptr.2d 467 , 861 P.2d 1153 (1993). … Moreover, Brown’s receipt of the property from her brother is not asserted to be intentional and, under California law, may constitute an occurrence. See St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Super.

Hamilton v. National Labor Relations Board

177 F.2d 676 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 1, 1949

She declined to respond to the Board’s subpena on the ground that the Board lacks jurisdiction of the proceeding inasmuch as the practices occurred more than six months prior to the lodging of the charges. … The Board had jurisdiction to issue the complaint and to conduct the proceeding.

Dennis Berkovich v. California Franchise Tax Board

15 F.4th 997 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 14, 2021

Berkovich cites our decision in California Franchise Tax Board v. Jerauld (In re Jerauld), 208 B.R. 183 (9th Cir. … (quoting FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 (2000))). Thus, “equivalent report or notice” must be something other than a “return.”

National Labor Relations Board v. Deutsch Company, Deutsch Company v. National Labor Relations Board

265 F.2d 473 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 8, 1959

B. v. … B. v.

Brown v. City of Phoenix

81 F. App'x 931 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 20, 2003

See Weiner v. San Diego County, 210 F.3d 1025, 1028 (9th Cir.2000). Mr. Brown’s effort to state a section 1983 claim against Mr. … Brown’s rights under the Constitution or federal law. See Bruns v. Nat’l Credit Union Admin., 122 F.3d 1251 , 1257 (9th Cir.1997). The Browns’ remaining contentions also lack merit. AFFIRMED.

Haleston Drug Stores, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board. Smith v. National Labor Relations Board

187 F.2d 418 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 15, 1951

In NLRB v. Indiana & M. … merely enabled to do so.” 2 Consult also Amalgamated Workers v.

Hason v. Medical Board of California

279 F.3d 1167 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 12, 2002

The Eleventh Amendment prohibits a private party from suing a nonconsenting state or its agencies in federal court. 1 See Board of Trustees of Univ. of Alabama v. … See Love v.

Clardy v. Levi

545 F.2d 1241 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 24, 1976

Prior to Pickus , Ramer and King the authorities uniformly rejected an application of the APA to the Board of Parole. See Hyser v. Reed, 115 U.S.App.D.C. 254 , 318 F.2d 225 , 236-237 (1963); Washington v. … Arkansas Board of Correction, 505 F.2d 194 (8th Cir. 1974); Gates v. Collier, 501 F.2d 1291 (5th Cir. 1974); Meyers v. Alldredge, 492 F.2d 296 (3rd Cir. 1974).