Case law

Rutledge v. Arizona Board of Regents

660 F.2d 1345 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 12, 1981

The Arizona Board of Regents is treated as the State of Arizona under Arizona law. See Arizona Board of Regents v. Arizona York Refrigeration Co., 115 Ariz. 338 , 565 P.2d 518 (1977). Its funds are state funds. … Under similar circumstances, other courts have concluded that a suit against the Board of Regents must be considered a suit against the state for Eleventh Amendment purposes. Martin v.

Sharp v. Haight, Brown & Bonesteel

13 F. App'x 687 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 12, 2001

We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, see Botosan v. … See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 324 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986).

Dalton Equipment Company, Inc., Creditor-Appellee v. Charles E. Brown, AKA Charles Elmer Brown, Debtor-Appellant

594 F.2d 195 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 28, 1979

See, Matter of Brissette, 561 F.2d 779, 781 (9th Cir. 1977); Young Properties Corp. v. … The distinction is more specifically stated in Snow v.

George Gilbert and Jess Brown v. United States

307 F.2d 322 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 8, 1962

In Herzog v. … In Billeci v. United States, 290 F.2d 628, 629 (9th Cir. 1961), we quoted with approval from Smith v.

Brown v. Southern California IBEW-NECA Trust Funds

588 F.3d 1000 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 7, 2009

Brown appealed the decision of the Board of Trustees to the Board of Trustees Appeals Sub-Committee. … Ill The Decision of the Board of Trustees to Suspend Brown’s Early Retirement Benefits. The Board of Trustees erred under either an abuse of discretion or a de novo standard of review. See McDaniel v.

United States v. Paul Howard Gumerlock, United States of America v. Marc Paul Fannon

590 F.2d 794 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 2, 1979

BROWNING, Circuit Judge: Heroin was discovered in packages delivered to United Airlines by appellants for shipment. … Jackson v.

Byrd v. Maricopa County Board of Supervisors

845 F.3d 919 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 6, 2017

See Byrd v. Maricopa Cty. … And in Oliver v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Stoller

207 F.2d 305 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 21, 1953

In support of their contention that the Board’s jurisdiction should not have been exercised in this case, respondents cite N.L.R.B. v. Guy F. … N.L.R.B. v. Townsend, 9 Cir., 185 F.2d 378 ; Haleston Drug Stores, 9 Cir., 187 F.2d 418 ; Katz v. N. L. R. B., 9 Cir., 196 F.2d 411 . 4 .

Carlos Alberto Villanueva-Franco v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

802 F.2d 327 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 10, 1986

Although we have required the Board to provide more than “[m]ere conclusory statements”, Dragon v. … INS, 748 F.2d 1304, 1306 (9th Cir.1984), all that is necessary is a decision that sets out terms sufficient to enable us as a reviewing court to see that the Board has heard, considered, and decided. See Osuchukwu v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Cantrall

201 F.2d 853 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 20, 1953

B. v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co., 9 Cir., 1951, 193 F.2d 324 ; International Union, United Mine Workers v. N. L. R. … See North Whittier Heights Citrus Ass’n v. N. L. R. B., 9 Cir., 109 F.2d 76, 78-79 , certiorari denied 310 U.S. 632 , 60 S.Ct. 1075 , 84 L.Ed. 1402 ; N. L. R. B. v.

Earth Island Institute v. Brown

17 F.3d 1241 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 3, 1994

Brower, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Ronald H. BROWN, * Secretary of Commerce, et al., Defendants-Appellants, and American Tunaboat Association; Joseph J. Medina, Jr. and Manuel A. Silva, Defendants-Intervenors. … Earth Island Institute v. Mosbacher, 785 F.Supp. 826, 828 (N.D.Cal.1992). 3 Appellants argue that under 28 U.S.C.

National Labor Relations Board v. Townsend

185 F.2d 378 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 22, 1950

United States v. Kiles, 8 Cir., 70 *382 F.2d 880 ; United States v. Ellison, 4 Cir., 74 F.2d 864, 869 ; Vincent v. United States, 64 App.D. 178, 76 F.2d 428 .” … B. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Swinerton

202 F.2d 511 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 17, 1953

Whether the Board should assume jurisdiction in respect to a particular industry is in the absence of abuse of discretion exclusively for the Board. N.L.R.B. v. Guy F. … The Board asserted jurisdiction over the industry as early as 1948. See N.L.R.B. v. Guy F. Atkinson, supra, 195 F.2d at page 143 .

Kenneth William Brown, Jr. v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent

11 F.3d 914 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 10, 1993

Since Brown had available state court remedies at the time he filed his federal habeas petition, the proper ground for dismissing the petition was failure to exhaust, not procedural default. See Matias v. … See White v. Lewis, 874 F.2d 599, 602 (9th Cir.1989); Matias, 683 F.2d at 321 ; accord Domaingue v. Butterworth, 641 F.2d 8, 14 (1st Cir.1981).

National Labor Relations Board v. Nesen

211 F.2d 559 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 26, 1954

B. v. Shannon, supra, 9 Cir., 208 F.2d 545 . The evidence also shows that respondent, through his bargaining agent, had stated to the Board’s field examiner that the contract was signed. … B. v. Shannon, 9 Cir., 208 F.2d 545 . 7 . See McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co., 336 U.S. 187, 191-193 , 69 S.Ct. 497 , 93 L.Ed. 599 ; United States v.

United States v. Jacqualine Brown

15 F.3d 1090 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 22, 1993

Brown acted voluntarily. Cf. Hartford v. … United States v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst

102 F.2d 658 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 28, 1939

It is immaterial whether such activities are local in character as shown by the following from National Labor Board v. … Both arguments are disposed of by National Labor Board v. Mackay Co., 304 U.S. 333, 350 , 58 S.Ct. 904 , 82 L.Ed. 1381 .

Leonard v. National Labor Relations Board

197 F.2d 435 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 29, 1952

Beverage Co. v. N. L. R. … In this the Board is supported by such decisions as Texas & Pacific R. Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co., 204 U.S. 426 , 27 S.Ct. 350 , 51 L.Ed. 553 , Armour & Co. v. Alton R.

Brown v. Baker Hughes Inc.

270 F. App'x 604 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 18, 2008

Brown’s allegation of a conflict *605 of interest does not alter this standard of review, especially because she has presented no evidence of an actual, rather than a formal, conflict. Abatie v. … Id. at 971 (quoting Gatti v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., 415 F.3d 978, 985 (9th Cir.2005)). The parties dispute the relevance of the Summary Plan Description, which Brown denies she or Hunt ever received.

Richard Greve v. Civil Aeronautics Board

378 F.2d 651 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 6, 1967

Petitioner appealed this revocation to the Civil Aeronautics Board, and an evidentiary hearing was held before a Board Examiner. … See Doe v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 356 F.2d 699 (10th Cir. 1966).