Case law

Union Gospel Mission of Yakima Washington v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 18, 2026

Brown, et al. 24-7246 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK BUMATAY, Circuit Judge, joined by VANDYKE and TUNG, Circuit Judges, U.S. … See, e.g., Kennedy v. Bremerton Sch. Dist., 4 F.4th 910, 945 (9th Cir. 2021) (R. Nelson, J., dissenting from the denial of reh’g en banc); Hittle v.

McQuillion v. Schwarzenegger

369 F.3d 1091 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 19, 2004

In Preiser v. … See Butterfield v.

Aronoff v. Franchise Tax Board

348 F.2d 9 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 25, 1965

Aronoff v. Franchise Tax Board, 60 Cal.2d 177 , 32 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 383 P.2d 409 (1963). … The Supreme Court opinion in Matthews v.

United States v. Lawrence

627 F.3d 1281 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 10, 2010

United States v. … See Singh v.

Sterling v. Feek

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 4, 2025

STERLING V. … California, 543 U.S. 499, 504–05 (2005) (holding that plaintiffs who were injured by parole board policy of failing to accommodate disabilities “all established the same injury,” even though plaintiffs suffered from different

Board of Com'rs v. Anderson

68 F. 341 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 29, 1895

Tax Titles, §§ 1220, 1222; Gibson v. Mason, 5 Nev. 285 . … Const. 196; Nichols v. Halliday, 27 Wis. 406 .”

Adams v. Railroad Retirement Board

214 F.2d 534 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 29, 1954

See Railroad [Retirement] Board v. Duquosne [Warehouse] Co., 326 U.S. 446 [ 66 S.Ct. 238, 90 L. Ed. 192 ]; Despatch Shops v. Railroad Retirement Board, [80 U.S.App.D.C. 374], 153 F.2d 644 ; Despatch Shops v. … Railroad Retirement Board, 2 Cir., 154 F.2d 417 ; and Spencer v. Railroad Retirement Board, 3 Cir., 166 F.2d 342. “2.

Bauer v. Board of Supervisors

44 F. App'x 194 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 8, 2002

French v. … Bauer brought suit against Navajo County Board of Supervisors, each board member individually in their official capacity, and Sheriff Gary Butler in his official capacity. .

Marco Antonio Lara-Cazares v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

408 F.3d 1217 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 23, 2005

The Immigration Judge, and later the Board, found that his conviction so qualified. … Ye v.

Brown v. Greyhound Lines Inc.

23 F. App'x 817 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 21, 2001

Brown never filed a proof of claim in the bankruptcy court. The National Labor Relations Board and Brown’s union, however, filed proof of claims on behalf of several strikers, including Brown. … Robertson v. Isomedix, Inc. (In re Int’l Nutronics, Inc.), 28 F.3d 965, 969 (9th Cir.).

Brown v. MCI WorldCom Network Services, Inc.

277 F.3d 1166 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 17, 2002

Lowden v. Simonds-Shields Lonsdale Grain Co., 306 U.S. 516, 520 , 59 S.Ct. 612 , 83 L.Ed. 953 (1939). See also AT & T Corp. v. … Corp. v. Mezzalingua Assocs., Inc., 921 F.Supp. 936, 941 (N.D.N.Y. 1996) citing National Communications Ass’n. v.

United States v. Water Resources Control Board

988 F.3d 1194 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 24, 2021

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The California State Water Resources Control Board (the Board) is a state agency that administers water rights  UNITED STATES V. … We refer to the Board and Esquivel collectively as the Board. 6 UNITED STATES V. STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BD.

Sprint v. Telephony Pcs v. County of San Diego

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 12, 2007

The County also argued that the members of its Board of Supervisors, named by Sprint as defendants in their individual capacities, were absolutely immune from damages under § 1983. … City of White Plains, 430 F.3d 529, 535 (2d Cir. 2005) (applying § 332(c)(7)(B)(i)(II) to determine whether planning board must grant application to construct wireless tower); MetroPCS, Inc. v.

Darrell Lee Brown v. Richard H. Rison, Warden

895 F.2d 533 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 23, 1990

See Miller v. Fairchild Ind., Inc., 797 F.2d 727 , 738 (9th Cir.1986). B. … The restrictions upon Brown appear to have been substantially more severe than those imposed on the accused in United States v.

MacE v. Skinner

34 F.3d 854 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 6, 1994

No. 1J v. … McCarthy v.

Sierra Publishing Company D/B/A the Sacramento Union v. National Labor Relations Board

889 F.2d 210 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 3, 1989

STANDARD OF REVIEW This court will enforce an NLRB order if the Board correctly applied the law and if its factual findings are supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. NLRB v. … See, e.g., Golden Day Schools, Inc. v. NLRB, 644 F.2d 834 (9th Cir.1981); Misericordia Hospital Medical Ctr v.

Citadel Holding Corp., a Delaware Corporation v. Alfred Roven American Underwriters, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

26 F.3d 960 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 9, 1994

See also, Greene v. … (“Bank Board”).

Mark Oyama v. University of Hawaii

813 F.3d 850 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 29, 2015

Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988), and Judge Graber’s opinion in Brown v. … Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1968).

David Schwake v. Arizona Board of Regents

967 F.3d 940 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 29, 2020

v. 2:15-cv-00696- SPL ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS; MICHAEL M. … ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS allegations of background indicia of sex discrimination. See Menaker v.

Rutledge v. Arizona Board of Regents

660 F.2d 1345 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 12, 1981

The Arizona Board of Regents is treated as the State of Arizona under Arizona law. See Arizona Board of Regents v. Arizona York Refrigeration Co., 115 Ariz. 338 , 565 P.2d 518 (1977). Its funds are state funds. … Under similar circumstances, other courts have concluded that a suit against the Board of Regents must be considered a suit against the state for Eleventh Amendment purposes. Martin v.