Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.31s
United States v. Harry E. Claiborne
765 F.2d 784 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 8, 1985
In addition, one grand jury agent informally granted immunity to a grand jury witness. Id. … In addition, a defendant may rebut the Government’s proof of willfulness by establishing good faith reliance on a qualified accountant after full disclosure of tax-related information. Bursten v.
Overruled — as noted by a later courtCited 84 timesPublishedSeth Rosenfeld v. United States Department of Justice the Federal Bureau of Investigation
57 F.3d 803 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 12, 1995
The government bears the burden of establishing the applicability of the exemption. Department of Justice v. Landano, — U.S. -, -, 113 S.Ct. 2014, 2019 , 124 L.Ed.2d 84 (1993). … It is also easy to prove: “The FBI need only establish the informant was told his name would be held in confidence.” Id.
Cited 110 timesPublished59 F.2d 55 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 31, 1932
From the record there is no question but that the proof is sufficient to establish reinstatement of the $10,000 policy, as found by the jury; and we think it is likewise clearly shown by the photostatic copy of the change … There is likewise no apparent reason why the insured may not designate any qualified beneficiary for a part of the policy.
Cited 2 timesPublished95 F.3d 1157 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 21, 1996
Kodman argues that the district court erred in finding that Corbin was entitled to qualified immunity. We review de novo the district court's grant of qualified immunity. Neely v. … Feinstein, 50 F.3d 1502, 1507 (9th Cir.1995). 4 Corbin is entitled to qualified immunity from suits under § 1983 if her official conduct " 'does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedDavid Demarest v. City of Vallejo
44 F.4th 1209 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 16, 2022
Applying these standards, we take the following facts as established for purposes of this appeal. 6 DEMAREST V. … Because the court thus concluded that Officer Brown had not committed the alleged constitutional violations, it did not address the issue of qualified immunity or the additional issues concerning the City’s potential liability
Cited 25 timesPublishedDalton v. Washington State Department of Corrections
344 F. App'x 300 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 18, 2009
Even if we assume that Robinson did know, Dalton failed to provide more than “mere evidence” that Robinson was aware of his future testimony, which is required in order to establish a genuine material dispute as to whether … We remand the issue of qualified immunity, “which should be addressed by the district court in the first instance.” Swift v. California, 384 F.3d 1184, 1193 (9th Cir.2004). Each party to bear their own costs on appeal.
Cited 0 timesPublished120 F.3d 1028 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 30, 1997
The government did not call the one witness, however, who could establish the § 924(c) violations, because it became apparent that the witness would invoke his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself. … as a result of the government's failure to grant them immunity on its own. 40 Immunity is an executive, not a judicial, function, and this court has emphatically rejected the argument that the sixth amendment provides a
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Ass'n of Physically Handicapped, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
721 F.2d 667 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 8, 1983
For the reason discussed below, CAPH cannot legally qualify as a prevailing party under Section 505(b). In Fitzharris v. … The Supreme Court’s decision in Gottfried clearly states that the FCC is not a funding agency and therefore has no obligation to enforce Section 504. See discussion of Section 504 in text above. .
Cited 25 timesPublishedWalter SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SINGER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
650 F.2d 214 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 6, 1982
Appellant contends that he should have been granted a hearing to establish that Singer’s reasons for firing him were pretextual, arguing that he would have been fired whether he denied authorship of the complaints or not. … If § 2000e-3(a) gives him the right to make himself an adversary of the company, then so long as he does not give nonprivileged cause for dismissal he is forever immune from discharge.
Cited 12 timesPublishedChris Rowenhorst v. Viola Mitchell Tracy L. Brown
981 F.2d 1259 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 28, 1992
The district court dismissed the action on the grounds that Rowenhorst failed to allege either a violation of a clearly established constitutional right, or a claim sufficient to overcome the defendants' qualified immunity … "Unless the plaintiffs allegations state a claim of violation of clearly established law, a defendant pleading qualified immunity is entitled to dismissal before the commencement of discovery." Mitchell v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished442 F.2d 1136 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 7, 1971
Appellants contend that they are immune from the assertion of in personam jurisdiction in Alaska, because none had sufficient contacts with Alaska to render it amenable to substituted process. 2 The action arises from the … Although its effects were clearly felt in Hawaii, the alleged wrongful conduct took place outside of the forum.
Cited 0 timesPublishedXin Liu v. Amway Corporation Does 1-50 Inclusive
347 F.3d 1125 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 30, 2003
Under DOL regulations, the mischaracterization of Liu’s FMLA leave as personal leave qualifies as “interference” with her leave. … Stevenson established a set of requirements that a policy must satisfy to support a tortious discharge claim. First, the policy must be supported by either constitutional or statutory provisions.
Cited 184 timesPublishedEdwards v. High Desert State Prison
615 F. App'x 457 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 2, 2015
Edwards’s search involved far different circumstances and occurred in 2009, when the constitutionality of occasional cross-gender observation of searches was not clearly established. … The female guard is therefore entitled to qualified immunity from liability. Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 231 (2009). We need not and do not consider the underlying Fourth Amendment question.
Cited 1 timesUnpublished254 F.3d 772 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 13, 2001
This argument is clearly insufficient when applied to the governmental defendants. … To the extent that the plaintiffs' § 1983 claim is based on an alleged violation of their rights under § 7 of the NLRA, therefore, it qualifies as an ordinary subject of unfair labor practice proceedings before the National
Cited 1 timesPublished113 F.3d 988 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 7, 1997
The ASCS was established pursuant to the Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act, Pub.L. No. 46, 49 Stat. 163 (1935). … Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, asserting that there were "special factors" that precluded the judicial creation of a Bivens remedy and that defendants were entitled to either qualified or absolute immunity
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Garcia-Benavides
49 F. App'x 686 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 16, 2002
Garcia-Benavides argues that the district court erred in concluding that his 1989 conviction under California Health and Safety Code § 11351 qualified as an aggravated felony. … establish that the conviction is a predicate conviction for enhancement purposes.’ ” United States v.
Cited 1 timesPublished761 F.2d 1342 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 23, 1985
cost of living or a special factor, such as the limited availability of qualified attorneys for the proceedings involved, justifies a higher fee____ The district court concluded that a fee in excess of $75 per hour was warranted … We must consider carefully the scope of the government’s waiver of its sovereign immunity. We cannot order an award that has not been “specifically and unequivocally authorized by Congress.” Van Hoomissen v.
Modified by Underwood v. Pierce, 802 F.2d 1107 (1986)Cited 22 timesPublishedJonathan Knotts v. Ray Carreira
511 F. App'x 665 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 18, 2013
The officers therefore are entitled to -2- qualified immunity with regard to the search. See Burrell v. … Because the officers reasonably believed they had probable cause to arrest Knotts for possessing an illegal weapon, they are entitled to qualified immunity.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedTiffany Hill v. Xerox Business Services
868 F.3d 758 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 7, 2017
9 hourly workers a ‘per-minute’ rate and thereby avoid the Washington law governing workers paid on a per-hour rate.”6 There is certainly merit to this argument; defining a unit of production as a minute is clearly … These documents hardly establish an industry standard, but they do nominally support the idea that compensating employees on a per-minute basis arises out of the unique situation facing call centers.
Cited 8 timesPublishedAmerican Fidelity Fire Insurance v. United States District Court
538 F.2d 1371 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 18, 1976
The government first contended that it had not waived its immunity to be sued in the state or district court. … When a district court rules on a venue change motion totally at odds with the relevant facts, it may make sense to review the decision on the basis whether it is clearly erroneous or an abuse of discretion.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna