Case law

Oregon King Min. Co. v. Brown

119 F. 48 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 6, 1902

Brown. "Anna Brown. O. Friend.” … In Gleeson v.

Pacific Coast Coal Co. v. Brown

214 F. 255 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 1, 1914

On the contrary, that court in the late case of Delaski et al. v. … The case of Delaski et al. v.

Pacific Coast Coal Co. v. Brown

211 F. 869 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 24, 1914

provided for in section 7872, *873 and said board shall, after investigation confirm or revoke the orders of .the mining inspector. … See, also, the decision of this court in Davis v. Trade Dollar Mining Co., 117 Fed. 122 , 54 C. C. A. 636 ; Browne v. King, 100 Fed. 561 , 40 C. C. A. 545 ; and What Cheer Coal Co. v. Johnson, 56 Fed. 810 , 6 C. C.

Brown v. Del Papa

317 F. App'x 589 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 13, 2006

Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765, 768 , 115 S.Ct. 1769 , 131 L.Ed.2d 834 (1995); Rice v. Collins, 546 U.S. 333 , 126 S.Ct. 969, 974 , 163 L.Ed.2d 824 (2006). … Nor does Kesser v.

Preben Norgaard Sandra C. Norgaard v. Commissioner Internal Revenue Service

939 F.2d 874 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 30, 1991

Norgaard testified that he kept all of his winnings, daily programs, and losing tickets in a brown bag, which he produced at trial. … The Norgaards assert that they had kept adequate records by using their “brown bag” method, by keeping the losing tickets, programs, and net winnings in a brown paper bag and tracing money to the Mission Hills’ account.

Theis Research, Inc. v. Brown & Bain

111 F. App'x 511 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 20, 2004

Woods v. Brown. Woods v. Sanford

184 F.2d 486 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 28, 1950

Warner Holding Co. v. Creedon, 8 Cir., 166 F.2d 119, 122 ; Chapman v. United States, 8 Cir., 139 F.2d 327, 331 . And see Porter v. Warner Holding Co., 328 U.S. 395 , 66 S.Ct. 1086 , 90 L.Ed. 1332 .

Peacock v. Board of Regents

597 F.2d 163 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 2, 1979

See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Peacock v. Board of Regents, 510 F.2d 1324 (9th Cir. 1975). … Peacock v. Board of Regents, supra.

John Ii Estate, Ltd. v. Brown

201 F. 224 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 7, 1912

Zupplein v. Austin, 6 Hawaii, 8, 10 ; Paaluhi v. Keliihaleole, 11 Hawaii, 101, 103 ; Fitchie v. Brown, 18 Hawaii, 52, 71 ; 30 Am. & Eng. Ency. 644. … It is next contended by the plaintiff in error that this controversy is res judicata; that in two prior.Hawaiian cases—Brown v. Brown,, 11 Hawaii, 47 , and Brown v.

Alaska v. Federal Subsistence Board

544 F.3d 1089 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 23, 2008

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellee Federal Subsistence Board (“FSB” or “Board”) administers the federal subsistence program at the heart of Title VIII of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (“ANILCA … V.

Brown v. New York Life Ins. Co.

152 F.2d 246 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 24, 1945

Brown. For a more complete statement of the facts in this case, see the opinion of the lower court. Brown v. New York Life Ins. Co., D. C., 58 F.Supp. 252 . … We find nothing in the record to indicate a contract between Brown and the Bank making any of his accounts anything other than general accounts. See Dahl & Penne, Inc. v. State Bank of Portland, supra; Keyes v.

United States v. Brown

171 F. App'x 576 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 16, 2006

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Brown has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. … Brown has not filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the government has not filed an answering brief. We have conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v.

United States v. Brown

167 F. App'x 673 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 17, 2006

We are not persuaded by Brown’s reliance on United States v. Brooks, 966 F.2d 1500 (D.C.Cir.1992). … See United States v.

United States v. Noe Arias-Ordonez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 8, 2010

Gonzales, 412 F.3d 1117, 1120- 21 (9th Cir. 2009) (“The Board interpreted [8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(d)] to mean that any time a petitioner files a motion to reopen after departing the country, the motion is barred.”). … See Walters v.

Titus Lee Brown, Jr. v. Robert Borg

951 F.2d 1011 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 6, 1991

People v. Brown, 207 Cal.App.3d 741 , 255 Cal.Rptr. 67 (1989). The California Supreme Court denied review, and ordered the Court of Appeal decision de-pub-lished. Id. 255 Cal.Rptr. at 67 n.*. … Miller v. Pate, 386 U.S. 1 , 87 S.Ct. 785 , 17 L.Ed.2d 690 (1967); United States v. Brown, 880 F.2d 1012 (9th Cir.1989).

Kathy Brown v. Civil Service Commission, Department of Education and Territorial Board of Education, Real Parties in Interest-Appellant

818 F.2d 706 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 3, 1987

It also established a Board of Education (“Board”). 17 G.C.A. § 3102(a). … Bordallo v.

Daniels v. Merit Systems Protection Board

832 F.3d 1049 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 9, 2016

SMITH, Circuit Judge: The Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) has jurisdiction over individual right of action (“IRA”) appeals only when a petitioner makes “non-frivolous allegations.” See Yunus v. … However, the Special Counsel’s findings are not binding on the Board. See Frazier v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 672 F.2d 150, 164 & n.51 (D.C. Cir. 1982). 12 DANIELS V.

United States v. Brown

150 F. App'x 718 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 19, 2005

Because Brown was sentenced under the mandatory provisions of *719 the Sentencing Guidelines, we remand in accordance with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). … See United States v. Stafford, 416 F.3d 1068, 1074 (9th Cir.2005). Brown’s plea agreement waived his right to a speedy trial.

United States v. Brown

146 F. App'x 909 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 21, 2005

Brown appeals the sentence and special condition of probation imposed after her guilty-plea conviction for theft by an insurance company employee in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1033 (b). … See United States v. Terrigno, 838 F.2d 371, 374-75 (9th Cir.1988). However, we remand the sentence for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

Paul F. Jancsek, III v. Oregon Board of Parole

833 F.2d 1389 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 11, 1987

See, e.g., Pedro v. Oregon Parole Board, 825 F.2d 1396, 1398 (9th Cir.1987). … In Greenholtz v.