Case law

Delara Nasseri v. Robert Moschorak, District Director, U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service

34 F.3d 723 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 14, 1994

Desir v. Ilchert, 840 F.2d 723, 726 (9th Cir.1988). We review factual determinations underlying the Board’s decision under the substantial evidence standard. INS v. … See Blanco-Lopez v. INS, 858 F.2d 531 , 534 n. 2 (1988).

Carl Merton Irons, Ii, U.S. Attorney General, Intervenor v. Tom L. Carey, Warden

479 F.3d 658 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 6, 2007

Sass, 461 F.3d at 1128 ; Biggs, 334 F.3d at 914; McQuillion v. Duncan, 306 F.3d 895, 903 (9th Cir.2002); see also Bd. of Pardons v. … F.3d at 1128 -29 (citing Superintendent v.

Fanucchi & Limi Farms, a General Partnership, AKA Fanucchi-Limi Farms Partnership 2 Larry Fanucchi Richard Limi v. United Agri Products, a Corporation, Fanucchi & Limi Farms, a General Partnership, AKA Fanucchi-Limi Farms Partnership 2 Larry Fanucchi Richard Limi v. United Agri Products, a Corporation

414 F.3d 1075 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 14, 2005

Davisson v. Faucher, 105 Cal.App.2d 445, 447 , 233 P.2d 567 (1951); Eckart v. Brown, 34 Cal.App.2d 182, 187 , 93 P.2d 212 (1939); Beckwith v. Sheldon, 165 Cal. 319, 323-24 , 131 P. 1049 (1913). … Certainly, the presumption is against any such conclusion. 81 329 P.2d at 31 (emphases added); see also Brown v.

Steven Michael Oshatz v. United States

404 F.2d 9 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 23, 1968

See Simmons v. United States, supra; Chernekoff v. United States, 219 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1955). … See, e. g., Davis v. United States, 374 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1967); United States v. Gearey, 368 F.2d 144 (2d Cir. 1966); United States v. Al-Majied Muhammad, 364 F.2d 223 (4th Cir. 1966); United States v.

United States v. Ward

148 F. 663 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 1, 1906

Upon every vessel not of the United States, which shall be entered in one district from another district, having on board goods, wares or merchandise talcen in one district to be delivered in another district, duties shall … In White’s Bank v. Smith, 7 Wall. 646 , 19 L. Ed. 211 , the court said: “Ships or vessels of the United States are the creations of the legislation of Congress.

Harpal Singh Cheema Rajwinder Kaur v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

350 F.3d 1035 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 1, 2003

The Board cannot bypass the second prong of the statutory inquiry by asserting that its conclusions are “self-evident.” See Ghaly v. INS, 58 F.3d 1425, 1430 (9th Cir.1995); cf. Paramasamy v. … The Board must provide an objective basis for its holding. Rodriguez-Matamoros v. INS, 86 F.3d 158, 161 (9th Cir.1996). We will not deny the Board the opportunity to make this judgment.

Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen and Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. National Labor Relations Board

302 F.2d 198 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 16, 1962

Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 350 U.S. 270, 284 , 76 S.Ct. 349 , 100 L.Ed. 309 (1955). … National Labor Relations Board v. Lion Oil Co., 352 U.S. 282, 289 , 77 S.Ct. 330 , 1 L.Ed.2d 331 (1956).

Thompson v. Calderon

151 F.3d 918 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 11, 1998

JUDGE BROWNING, JUDGE SCHROEDER, JUDGE FLETCHER, JUDGE REINHARDT, JUDGE TASHIMA, JUDGE THOMAS concurring in Parts I, II, III, and IV, and JUDGE BROWNING, JUDGE SCHROEDER, JUDGE FLET.CHER, JUDGE THOMAS concurring in Part V … Under Gregg v.

Bliss O. Bignall, Jr., Et Ux. v. North Idaho College

538 F.2d 243 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 17, 1976

(S imard v. Board of Education (2d Cir. 1973) 473 F.2d 988, 992 ; Ferguson v. … Cedar Rapids Community School District (8th Cir. 1974) 494 F.2d 353 ; Simard v. Board of Education, supra; Vance v. Chester County Board of School Trustees, supra; Ferguson v. Thomas, supra.); cf.

Romano v. Bible

169 F.3d 1182 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 26, 1999

Stivers v. Pierce, 71 F.3d 732, 749 (9th Cir.1995). However, the Romanos have brought suit against individual Board and Commission members in their personal capacities as well. … See Hirsh v.

Khapabhai Dahyabhai Patel and Pramilaben Khapabhai Patel v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

638 F.2d 1199 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 30, 1981

On appeal, we reversed the Board’s application of the Heitland criterion. Ruangswang v. INS, 591 F.2d 39 (9th Cir. 1978). … Previous cases considering Board adjudicatory actions appear to agree. See, e. g., Ruangswang v. INS, 591 F.2d 39 (9th Cir. 1978); Mehta v. INS, 574 F.2d 701 (2d Cir. 1978). 5 .

United States v. Rupert Earl McClendon United States of America v. Bernest Collins

782 F.2d 785 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 10, 1986

Juror Brown took the discharged juror’s place in the box and both she and juror Kemp were examined. At the close of the examination, the government sought to exercise its peremptory challenge against juror Brown. … In Brown v.

David Schwake v. Arizona Board of Regents

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 29, 2020

No. 2:15-cv-00696-SPL v. MEMORANDUM* ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS; MICHAEL M. … Morales v. Fry, 873 F.3d 817, 821 (9th Cir. 2017) (quoting Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 536 U.S. 731, 735, 741 (2011)).

United States v. John Carl Hulphers, Jr.

421 F.2d 1291 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 29, 1969

Defendant contends that the conviction must be reversed because the local board, after classifying him I-A, did not meet and order him to report for induction. But as we pointed out in United States v. … Accord, United States v. Rusk, 419 F.2d 133 (9th Cir. Nov. 28, 1969); United States v. Doran, 418 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir. Nov. 10, 1969).

Mark Wynar v. Douglas County School District

728 F.3d 1062 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 29, 2013

The handbook reproduced verbatim the portion of § 392.4655  WYNAR V. DOUGLAS CNTY. SCH. DIST. 23 that the school board found Landon to have violated. … Douglas County’s correspondence with Landon’s parents and the board minutes stated that Landon was being charged with a violation of board policy and Nev. Rev.

Merced Hernandez-Rivera and Carlota Garcia-Vasquez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

630 F.2d 1352 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 23, 1980

In Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. … The Board correctly noted that it had no jurisdiction to adjudicate the constitutional issues raised by the petitioners; that task is within the exclusive province of the federal courts. See, Johnson v.

United States v. Exxon Mobil Corporation

943 F.3d 1283 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 9, 2019

Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board is authorized to “investigate (or cause to be  UNITED STATES V. … As with Request 14 UNITED STATES V.

William Alex Kariakin v. United States

261 F.2d 263 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 30, 1958

Goodrich v. United States, 5 Cir., 1944, 146 F.2d 265 ; Self v. United States, 4 Cir., 1945, 150 F.2d 745 . … His former acquittal does not prevent a subsequent prosecution for failure to comply with this later order of the local board. United States v. Bendik, 2 Cir., 1955, 220 F.2d 249 ; United States v.

Herbert Edmundo Gomez-Vigil and Silvia Auxiladora Hernandez De Gomez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

990 F.2d 1111 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 26, 1993

PER CURIAM: In Castillo-Villagra v. … Our review of the Board’s decision is governed by Castillo-Villagra v.

Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, a Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists Local 1304, Etc.

344 F.2d 300 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 20, 1965

V. Prentice Machinery Co. v. Associated Plywood Mills, 9 cir., 252 F.2d 473, 476-477 ; Travelers Indemnity Co. v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins., 9 cir., 330 F.2d 250 , 257. … Feller in “Arbitration Journal”, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1964, referring to the Labor Board decision here referred to. In Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v.