Case law

Harpal Singh Cheema Rajwinder Kaur v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

383 F.3d 848 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 8, 2004

The Board cannot bypass the second prong of the statutory inquiry by asserting that its conclusions are “self-evident.” See Ghaly v. INS, 58 F.3d 1425, 1430 (9th Cir.1995); cf. Paramasamy v. … Because the Board erred in determining whether Cheema was a “danger to the security of the United States,” we remand to the Board to make that determination using the correct inquiry. INS v.

Ponciano Murillo-Aguilera v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

313 F.2d 141 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 25, 1963

His decision thereon may be appealed to the Board. 8 C.F.R. §§ 6.1 (b) (2), 8.11(e). 4 . Gallegos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 9 Cir., 310 F.2d 688 ; Giova v. Rosenberg, 9 Cir., 308 F.2d 347 . … See, also, Arreche-Barcelona v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 9 Cir., 310 F.2d 690 ; Holz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 9 Cir., 309 F.2d 452 ; Mai Kai Fong v.

Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, a Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists Local 1304, Etc.

344 F.2d 300 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 20, 1965

V. Prentice Machinery Co. v. Associated Plywood Mills, 9 cir., 252 F.2d 473, 476-477 ; Travelers Indemnity Co. v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins., 9 cir., 330 F.2d 250 , 257. … Feller in “Arbitration Journal”, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1964, referring to the Labor Board decision here referred to. In Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v.

William Alex Kariakin v. United States

261 F.2d 263 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 30, 1958

Goodrich v. United States, 5 Cir., 1944, 146 F.2d 265 ; Self v. United States, 4 Cir., 1945, 150 F.2d 745 . … His former acquittal does not prevent a subsequent prosecution for failure to comply with this later order of the local board. United States v. Bendik, 2 Cir., 1955, 220 F.2d 249 ; United States v.

The Queen

186 F. 725 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 21, 1910

In Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Philadelphia, 12 How. 299, 319 , 13 L. … In Bigley v. New York P. R. S. S. Co. (D.

In the Matter of Joseph S. And Joyce C. Pawling, Debtors. Jon W. And Patricia Brown and John E. Shepard v. William H. Hyer, Referee

415 F.2d 1212 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 7, 1969

The appellants in this court are three creditors of the Pawlings, John W. and Patricia Brown and John E. Shepard, referred to herein as the creditors. … On the latter date, and without prior notice to any creditor or other party, the referee in bankruptcy entered an order dismissing the proceedings. 1 Notice of the entry of that order was promptly mailed to the Browns.

Thompson v. Davis

295 F.3d 890 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 8, 2002

For example, circuit courts have long held that parole boards may not exclude an inmate from consideration for parole based on race. See, e.g., White v. Bond, 720 F.2d 1002, 1003 (8th Cir.1983); Candelaria v. … In addition, the parole board might show that legitimate penological interests justify consideration of an inmate's disability status beyond that appropriate in other settings. See Gates v.

96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 356, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 565 Michael L. Salstrom, and Gregory Lamont Gudger v. Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. Financial Assistance Incorporation, a Washington Corporation Continental Credit, a Washington Corporation Larry Aldi Gus Carlson Citibank (South Dakota) Na, a South Dakota Corporation, Michael L. Salstrom, and Dean Browning Webb v. Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. Financial Assistance Incorporation, a Washington Corp.

74 F.3d 183 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 17, 1996

SALSTROM, et al., Plaintiffs, and Dean Browning Webb, Appellant, v. CITICORP CREDIT SERVICES, INC.; Financial Assistance Incorporation, a Washington corp., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 94-35816, 94-35849. … Corp. v.

Willapoint Oysters, Inc. v. Ewing

174 F.2d 676 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 29, 1949

Note that there is no lay jury to be protected from improper influence. 20 See Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1938, 305 U.S. 197, 229-230 , 59 S.Ct. 206 , 83 L. … Ct. 391 , 77 L.Ed. 819 ; Ballston-Still-water Knitting Co. ,v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 1938, 98 E.2d 758, 760; N. L. R. B. v.

Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. Locke

572 F.3d 610 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 8, 2009

The Court discussed the application of the presumption against retroactivity in conjunction with the analysis in Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond, 416 U.S. 696 , 94 S.Ct. 2006 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974). … Brown v.

Conway v. United States

142 F.2d 202 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 3, 1944

Brazill, Chairman of Maricopa County Local Board No. 6. … comply with the board’s order.

Benitez v. Garcia

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 8, 2007

United States v. … Id. at 422; see also Browne, 205 U.S. at 317.

WESTERN MEDICAL ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

783 F.2d 1376 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 3, 1986

Center, Inc. v. … The Board “has employed its expertise and judgment in a way that the law has contemplated.” Id., cited in Johnson Oyster Co. v. Baldridge, 704 F.2d 1060, 1063 (9th Cir.1983). V.

Armendariz v. Penman

31 F.3d 860 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 1, 1994

Zinermon v. Burch, 494 U.S. 113, 135-138 , 110 S.Ct. 975, 988-90 , 108 L.Ed.2d 100 (1990); Sierra Lake Reserve v. … Arden-Guthrie and merely stated that an emergency existed in order to further other policies, then the Hodel exception to the general requirement that plaintiffs receive a pre-deprivation hearing before their property is boarded

United States v. Coates

692 F.2d 629 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 18, 1982

Before BROWNING, PREGERSON and POOLE, Circuit Judges. … Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 311 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1722 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979) 6 This interpretation is supported by U.S. v.

Boone v. Redevelopment Agency of City of San Jose

841 F.2d 886 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 1, 1988

Conley v. … Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943) (Parker ).

Griffin v. Arpaio

557 F.3d 1117 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 5, 2009

Defendants propose that we adopt the standard propounded by the Eleventh Circuit in Brown v. Sikes, 212 F.3d 1205, 1207-08 (11th Cir.2000). … Johnson v. Testman, 380 F.3d at 697 . Conclusion We reject the district court’s reliance on Brown in its dismissal of Griffin’s complaint, but we may affirm for any reason supported by the record. United States v.

Milne Employees Association v. Sun Carriers, Inc.

960 F.2d 1401 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 4, 1992

Bloom v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 734 F.Supp. 1553, 1559 (C.D.Cal.1990) (section 301 can preempt state law claim against defendants who did not sign CBA), aff'd, 933 F.2d 1013 (9th Cir.1991); Brown v. … Id. at 208 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 887 (quoting Roberts v. Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown & Baerwitz, 57 Cal.App.3d 104, 111 , 128 Cal.Rptr. 901, 906 (1976)).

Lewis v. Anderson

615 F.2d 778 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 29, 1979

In Auerbach v. … See Ross v.

United States v. Robert Louis Nicholas

15 F.3d 1093 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 21, 1994

United States v. Giddings, 740 F.2d 770, 772 (9th Cir.1984); Brown v. United States, 610 F.2d 672, 677 (9th Cir.1980). … See Brown, 610 F.2d at 677 . Only courts with jurisdiction over the prisoner or the custodian have jurisdiction over habeas corpus petitions filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 . Brittingham v.