Case law

Adela Hernandez-Ortiz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

777 F.2d 509 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 2, 1985

When the Board denies any motion as a matter of discretion, it must specify clearly the factors it has considered. See Patel v. INS, 741 F.2d 1134, 1137 (9th Cir.1984); De La Luz v. … V. CONCLUSION The Board of Immigration Appeals abused its discretion when it denied Hernandez-Ortiz’s motion to reopen.

Benitez v. Garcia

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 22, 2007

United States v. … Id. at 422; see also Browne, 205 U.S. at 317.

United States v. Exxon Mobil Corporation

943 F.3d 1283 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 9, 2019

Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board is authorized to “investigate (or cause to be  UNITED STATES V. … As with Request 14 UNITED STATES V.

United States v. Gregory Drew Harris

436 F.2d 775 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 28, 1970

conscientious objector claim de novo by his Appeals Board. 3 United States v. … The failure of the Appeals Board to state its reasons for denying Harris a 1-0 classification does not require reversal under United States v. Haughton, 413 F.2d 736 (9th Cir. 1969), or United States v.

State Board of Equalization of California v. Los Angeles International Airport Hotel Associates (In re Los Angeles International Airport Hotel Associates)

106 F.3d 1479 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 18, 1997

PER CURIAM: Debtor Los Angeles International Airport Hotel Associates (“L.A Airport”) brings this interlocutory appeal to challenge the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s determination that the State Board of Equalization (“SBE

United States v. Claud Michael Kember

437 F.2d 534 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 19, 1971

The local board did not do so. However, as pointed out in United States v. … Under the law as it exists today, a registrant is not entitled to counsel in proceedings before a draft board. United States v. Evans, 425 F.2d 302, 304 (9th Cir. 1970); Haven v.

Benjamin SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lowell W. PERRY, Director Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Defendant-Appellee

569 F.2d 1064 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 3, 1978

. § 2000e-16 because of the decision in Brown v. … Brown v. General Services Administration, supra, 425 U.S. at 832 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 ; Swain v. Hoffman, 547 F.2d 921, 923 (5th Cir. 1977). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

United States v. William Howard Munns

457 F.2d 271 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 19, 1972

The regulation requiring the registrant to keep the board informed at all times of a mailing address is valid, Bartchy v. … Thus the legitimate needs of the local board, as well as deference to the admin-1 istrative interpretation of the authorizing legislation, Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1 , 85 S.Ct. 792 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965), Bowles v.

Laurence Fredrick Anthony v. United States

331 F.2d 687 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 7, 1964

Gurera v. United States, 8 Cir. 1930, 40 F.2d 338, 340-341 ; Brown v. United States, 9 Cir. 1955, 222 F.2d 293, 298 ; Pependrea v. United States, 9 Cir. 1960, 275 F.2d 325, 330 . … He went out to appellant’s car and returned to the rear with a brown paper bag. When he reappeared in the living room, Landry had the brown paper sack in his hand and said to Gilkey ‘Here’s your stuff.’

Welch v. St. Helens Petroleum Co.

78 F.2d 631 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 9, 1935

The tax paid by a foreign corporation was considered by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Brown’s “Shamrock” Linens, Ltd., v. Bowers (C. C. A.) 48 F.(2d) 103 . … We conclude that the decisions of the Supreme Court in Heiner v. Diamond Alkali Co., supra, and of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Brown’s “Shamrock” Linens Co., Ltd., v.

Fosburgh v. California & Hawaiian Sugar Refining Co.

291 F. 29 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 2, 1923

Brown, the sales manager of the sugar company, testifies: “We bought sugar to aid our customers to have sufficient supplies.” … Meyer v. Estes, 164 Mass. 457 , 41 N. E. 683 , 32 L. R.

United States v. Lejon Robins, Aka: Edwin Price, Jr.

967 F.2d 1387 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 24, 1992

In United States v. … In United States v.

Raymond Arciniega v. Edward R. Freeman, U. S. Marshal

439 F.2d 776 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 1, 1971

A narcotics violator who is mandatorily released is under the jurisdiction of the Parole Board. Weber v. … The Parole Board had jurisdiction to revoke the parole. Weber v. Wil-lingham, supra, at 934.

Cox v. Wedemeyer

192 F.2d 920 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 21, 1951

Lawrence v. Yost, 9 Cir., 157 F.2d 44 . … United States v. Pitt, 3 cir., 144 F.2d 169 , 172: “ * * * an appeal board must hear and dispose of each case de novo in the same manner as must an appellate tribunal on an appeal in admiralty * * Cramer v.

City and County of San Francisco the Airports Commission of the City and County of San Francisco v. Federal Aviation Administration Department of Transportation, National Transportation Safety Board, (Three Cases) County of San Mateo v. Federal Aviation Administration Department of Transportation, National Transportation Safety Board, (Two Cases) City and County of San Francisco the Airports Commission of the City and County of San Francisco v. Federal Aviation Administration Department of Transportation, National Transportation Safety Board, Burlington Air Express ("Burlington"), Respondent-Intervenor

942 F.2d 1391 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 21, 1991

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION; Department of Transportation, National Transportation Safety Board, Respondents. (Three Cases) COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, Petitioner, v. … Before BROWNING, PREGERSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges. JAMES R.

UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 7, 2025

Petitioner, 32-CA-309933 v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. … Bell Foundry Co. v. NLRB, 827 F.2d 1340, 1343 (9th Cir. 1987) (citing NLRB v.

Jennifer Cruz v. the City of Anaheim

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 28, 2014

We therefore affirm summary judgment in favor of Officer Brown.  CRUZ V. … Brown shall recover his costs against appellants.

Kraft v. Jacka

872 F.2d 862 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 12, 1989

Bollow v. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 650 F.2d 1093, 1101 (9th Cir.1981) (citing Board of Regents v. … Learned v.

Individuals for Responsible Government, Inc. v. Washoe County

110 F.3d 699 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 1, 1997

United Food and Commercial Workers v. Brown Group, - U.S. -, -, 116 S.Ct. 1529, 1534 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996) (quoting Hunt v. … V.

United States v. Harry La Verne Timmins, II

464 F.2d 385 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 7, 1972

The board must consider all evidence in the registrant’s file. 32 C.F.R. § 1623.1 (b); Mizrahi v. United States, 409 F.2d 1219 (9th Cir. 1969); United States v. Turner, 421 F.2d 1251 (3rd Cir. 1970). … In United States v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 , 85 S.Ct. 850 , 13 L.Ed.2d 733 (1965), and Welsh v.