Case law

Stache v. International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen

852 F.2d 1231 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 1, 1988

Brown v. Puget Sound Elec. App. & Train. Trust, 732 F.2d 726 , 729 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1108 , 105 S.Ct. 784 , 83 L.Ed.2d 778 (1985). … Brown, 732 F.2d at 729 (quoting Oubichon v. Northern Am. Rockwell Corp., 482 F.2d 569, 571 (9th Cir.1973)).

Johnson v. Buckley

356 F.3d 1067 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 28, 2004

A memorandum from Plan counsel Brown (Brown Memorandum) to the Committee is clearly concerned with the meaning of the term “layoff’ and cites several cases supporting the definition ultimately applied by the Committee. … See Mead v. Intermec Techs.

UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 7, 2025

Petitioner, 32-CA-309933 v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. … Bell Foundry Co. v. NLRB, 827 F.2d 1340, 1343 (9th Cir. 1987) (citing NLRB v.

William Edward Franks v. United States

216 F.2d 266 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 4, 1954

v. … Other cases in which the failure of the local board to comply with regulations was not cured by the action of an appeal board are United States v. Fry, 2 Cir., 203 F.2d 638 , and United States v.

Toufighi v. Mukasey

510 F.3d 1059 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 12, 2007

TOUFIGHI v. MUKASEY 16379 The Board denied the motion on July 15, 2004. … INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992); INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 104-05 (1988). This Court defers to the Board’s exercise of discretion unless it acted arbitrarily, irrationally or contrary to law. Caruncho v.

The Chemehuevi Indian Tribe v. California State Board of Equalization George R. Reilly Iris Stankey William M. Bennett Richard Nevins Kenneth Cory Individually and in Their Official Capacities as Members of the California State Board of Equalization Bank of America N.T. & S.A., a National Banking Association and David Cordier, Individually and in His Capacity as Employee of the California State Board of Equalization the Chemehuevi Indian Tribe v. California State Board of Equalization Reilly, George R. Stankey, Iris Bennett, William M. Nevins, Richard & Cory, Kenneth Individually & in Their Official Capacities as Members of the California State Board of Equalization

757 F.2d 1047 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 12, 1985

757 F.2d 1047 The CHEMEHUEVI INDIAN TRIBE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION; George R. Reilly; Iris Stankey; William M. … The Board's attempted analogy is thus unpersuasive. 29 Second, it is the legislature's intent, not the Board's, that we must ascertain. The Board's interpretation of the statute may guide us, see Miller v.

Welch v. St. Helens Petroleum Co.

78 F.2d 631 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 9, 1935

The tax paid by a foreign corporation was considered by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Brown’s “Shamrock” Linens, Ltd., v. Bowers (C. C. A.) 48 F.(2d) 103 . … We conclude that the decisions of the Supreme Court in Heiner v. Diamond Alkali Co., supra, and of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Brown’s “Shamrock” Linens Co., Ltd., v.

Khapabhai Dahyabhai Patel and Pramilaben Khapabhai Patel v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

638 F.2d 1199 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 30, 1981

On appeal, we reversed the Board’s application of the Heitland criterion. Ruangswang v. INS, 591 F.2d 39 (9th Cir. 1978). … Previous cases considering Board adjudicatory actions appear to agree. See, e. g., Ruangswang v. INS, 591 F.2d 39 (9th Cir. 1978); Mehta v. INS, 574 F.2d 701 (2d Cir. 1978). 5 .

Albert S. Craig v. Far West Engineering Company, Inc., a Corporation, Far West Engineering Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Albert S. Craig

265 F.2d 251 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 7, 1959

In Borden Co. v. … Cf. also, Mitchell v. Brown, 8 Cir., 1955, 224 F.2d 359 , certiorari denied 350 U.S. 875 , 76 S.Ct. 119 , 100 L.Ed. 773 ; Bitch v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co., 9 Cir., 1946, 156 F.2d 334 ; Laudadio v. White Const.

David Morgan v. Cochise County Board of Supv.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 17, 2021

No. 4:19-cv-00571-DCB v. MEMORANDUM* COCHISE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; et al., Defendants-Appellees. … See Hartman v.

United States v. Guadalupe Rodriguez-Gastelum

569 F.2d 482 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 23, 1978

In Michigan v. … July 14, 1976; petition for rehearing pending); United States v. Kinsman, 540 F.2d 1017 (9th Cir. 1976); United States v. Womack, 542 F.2d 1047 (9th Cir. 1976); Keiper v. Cupp, 509 F.2d 238 (9th Cir. 1975); Williams v.

Abderrahman Chebchoub v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

257 F.3d 1038 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 23, 2001

Cordon-Garcia v. INS, 204 F.3d 985, 990 (9th Cir.2000). … Mejia Paiz v. INS, 111 F.3d 720, 723-24 (9th Cir.1997).

Parrott v. United States

370 F.2d 388 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 16, 1966

Witmer v. … Dickinson v. United States, supra; Witmer v. United States, supra; Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114, 122 , 66 S.Ct. 423 , 90 L.Ed. 567 (1946); Rogers v.

United States v. Exxon Mobil Corporation

943 F.3d 1283 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 9, 2019

Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board is authorized to “investigate (or cause to be  UNITED STATES V. … As with Request 14 UNITED STATES V.

United States v. Abdon Delgadillo-Velasquez

856 F.2d 1292 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 1, 1988

See Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603 , 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2261 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975). Here appellant does not argue that the police coerced or threatened him into consent. … Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975). This test also applies to consent to search given after illegal law enforcement activity. United States v.

State Board of Equalization of California v. Los Angeles International Airport Hotel Associates (In re Los Angeles International Airport Hotel Associates)

106 F.3d 1479 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 18, 1997

PER CURIAM: Debtor Los Angeles International Airport Hotel Associates (“L.A Airport”) brings this interlocutory appeal to challenge the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s determination that the State Board of Equalization (“SBE

Individuals for Responsible Government, Inc. v. Washoe County

110 F.3d 699 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 1, 1997

United Food and Commercial Workers v. Brown Group, - U.S. -, -, 116 S.Ct. 1529, 1534 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996) (quoting Hunt v. … V.

In re Incomnet, Inc.

463 F.3d 1064 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 20, 2006

Before: BROWNING, RAYMOND C. FISHER, and JAY S. BYBEE, Circuit Judges. … Counsel v.

Fosburgh v. California & Hawaiian Sugar Refining Co.

291 F. 29 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 2, 1923

Brown, the sales manager of the sugar company, testifies: “We bought sugar to aid our customers to have sufficient supplies.” … Meyer v. Estes, 164 Mass. 457 , 41 N. E. 683 , 32 L. R.

Southern California Edison Co. v. Lynch

353 F.3d 648 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 19, 2003

Southern California Edison Co. v. Peevey, 31 Cal.4th 781 , 74 P.3d 795, 797 (2003).