Case law

Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local Union 420 v. Kinney Air Conditioning Co.

756 F.2d 742 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 28, 1985

A mere procedural irregularity provides no basis upon which to conclude that the Board acted beyond its authority. See *745 John Wiley & Sons v. … Finally, Kinney failed to object to the selection of the Board members at the time they were seated and has thereby waived this objection. Kodiak Oil Field Haulers, Inc. v.

Miller v. Davis

521 F.3d 1142 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 2, 2008

V, § 8(b). … Ashelman v.

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airlines Division v. Allegiant Air, LLC

788 F.3d 1080 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 8, 2015

OF TEAMSTERS V. ALLEGIANT AIR Board (the Board) to certify them as the pilots’ bargaining representative under the Railway Labor Act (RLA). … See National Mediation Board, Representation  INT’L BHD. OF TEAMSTERS V.

John Alan Tomlinson v. United States

216 F.2d 12 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 15, 1954

If the local board erred in its use of the word “ordained”, such error was cured by the action of the appeal board under the rule of Cramer v. France, 9 Cir., 148 F.2d 801 ; Tyrrell v. … We note here that the board found that registrant was in fact a conscientious objector. It is evident that the board raised the question: conscientious objector to what? In White v.

Jack Warren Bradley v. United States

218 F.2d 657 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 29, 1954

Gonzales v. United States, supra; White v. United States, 9 Cir., 215 F.2d 782, 787 . … In view of the boards’ experience with cases of Jehovah’s Witnesses generally, the slenderness of this reed might well have been significant to the boards. United States v. Simmons, supra, 213 F.2d at page 906 . 8 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Cannery Workers of the Pacific, Affiliated With the Seafarers International Union of North America, Afl-Cio

396 F.2d 955 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 24, 1968

396 F.2d 955 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CANNERY WORKERS OF the PACIFIC, affiliated with the Seafarers International Union of North America, AFL-CIO, Respondent. No. 21680. … PER CURIAM: 1 The above-entitled petition for enforcement of the order of June 21, 1966, issued by the National Labor Relations Board, is granted on the authority of National Labor Relations Board v.

Pearson v. Muntz

639 F.3d 1185 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 5, 2011

PEARSON v. MUNTZ 4501 At its meeting, the Board first considers whether the inmate is “suitable” for parole release. Id. §§ 3041(b), 3041.5(a)(6). … v.

United States of America, and v. Rickie A. Scheiblauer, And

472 F.2d 297 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 17, 1973

United States v. Jennings, 468 F.2d 111 (C.A.9,1972); United States v. Davis, 459 F.2d 458, 459, fn. 3 (C.A.9, 1972); United States v. Brown, 436 F.2d 702, 705 (C.A.9, 1970); Arnold v. … United States v. Zubia-Sanchez, 448 F.2d 1232, 1233 (C.A.9, 1971); United States v. Fallis, 414 F.2d 772, 774 (C.A.9, 1969).

KDM ex rel. WJM v. Reedsport School District

196 F.3d 1046 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 15, 1999

His case is wholly unlike Brown v. Borough of Mahaffey, 35 F.3d 846 (3d Cir.1994), involving the deliberate installation by the city of a gate impeding access to a particular revival meeting, or Hartmann v. … Allen, 463 U.S. 388, 403 , 103 S.Ct. 3062 , 77 L.Ed.2d 721 (1983) (finding no entanglement despite the fact that state officials required to determine whether textbooks were religious); Board of Educ. v.

Knox v. United States

200 F.2d 398 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 4, 1952

As to failure to observe the requirements of § 1624.2, here involved, see United States v. Stiles, 3 Cir., 169 F.2d 455 ; Martin v. United States, 4 Cir., 190 F.2d 775 . With the above view of the law we are in accord. … One aspect of tliis limitation was developed in the decision of this court in Tyr-rell v. United States, 200 F.2d S, and not yet reported.

Carlin Constantine Venus v. United States

287 F.2d 304 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 2, 1961

As stated in Parker v. … See also Iver Ikuko Toguri D’Aquino v.

United States v. George E. Walker

653 F.2d 1343 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 17, 1981

Walker sold the Douglas fir to Coos Head for $90 per thousand board board feet, $40 under its $130 market value. … United States v. Brown, 578 F.2d 1280, 1285 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 928 , 99 S.Ct. 315 , 58 L.Ed.2d 322 (1978).

Southern California Edison Co. v. Lynch

353 F.3d 648 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 19, 2003

Southern California Edison Co. v. Peevey, 31 Cal.4th 781 , 74 P.3d 795, 797 (2003).

Charles Thomas Miller v. Joseph Barilla, Ass't District Attorney

549 F.2d 648 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 31, 1977

As the court in Brown v. … Brown v. Joseph, supra, pp. 1046-48, and the comments of Judge Aldisert on the “color of state law” claim. 5 .

Burt v. Yarborough

313 F. App'x 23 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 21, 2008

Riley v. … (quoting Brown v. Myers, 137 F.3d 1154, 1158 (9th Cir.1998)). Just as trial counsel’s failure to pursue similar evidence was deemed prejudicial in Riley v. Payne it ought to be deemed prejudicial here.

Toufighi v. Mukasey

510 F.3d 1059 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 12, 2007

TOUFIGHI v. MUKASEY 16379 The Board denied the motion on July 15, 2004. … INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992); INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 104-05 (1988). This Court defers to the Board’s exercise of discretion unless it acted arbitrarily, irrationally or contrary to law. Caruncho v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Carpenters Local Union No. 22, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Afl-Cio

482 F.2d 359 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 1, 1973

PER CURIAM: The challenged Order of the Petitioning Board followed its conclusion that the Respondents had violated Section 8(b) (4)(i) and (ii)(B) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended. 29 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq. … The Board’s Decision and Order is reported at 193 NLRB No. 105 . Our examination of the record convinces us that the Board’s critical factual determinations were supported by substantial evidence.

Wayne Myron Bishop v. United States

412 F.2d 1064 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 19, 1969

See also Storey v. United States, 370 F.2d 255 (9th Cir. 1966); DeRemer v. United States, 340 F.2d 712 (8th Cir. 1965). Accordingly, we limit our scrutiny to the standards applied by Bishop’s appeal board. … Bradley v.

Florentino Contreras-Buenfil v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

712 F.2d 401 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 1, 1983

We may reverse the Board’s denial of relief only if the Board’s exercise of its discretion was “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law.” Santana-Figueroa v. INS, 644 F.2d 1354, 1355-56 (9th Cir.1981). … Contreras-Buenfil cites Tovar v.

Jody Kaufmann v. Kilolo Kijakazi

32 F.4th 843 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 27, 2022

Brown, United States Attorney; Office of the General Counsel, Social Security Administration, Seattle, Washington; for Defendant- Appellee.  KAUFMANN V. … at all to a Board whose members are removable at will.”