Case law

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airlines Division v. Allegiant Air, LLC

788 F.3d 1080 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 8, 2015

OF TEAMSTERS V. ALLEGIANT AIR Board (the Board) to certify them as the pilots’ bargaining representative under the Railway Labor Act (RLA). … See National Mediation Board, Representation  INT’L BHD. OF TEAMSTERS V.

Retail Clerks Union v. Food Employers Council, Inc.

351 F.2d 525 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 19, 1965

B. v. Business Machine and Office Appliance Mechanics Conference Board, 300 F.2d 237 (2d Cir. 1962), and NLRB v. … B. v.

John Alan Tomlinson v. United States

216 F.2d 12 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 15, 1954

If the local board erred in its use of the word “ordained”, such error was cured by the action of the appeal board under the rule of Cramer v. France, 9 Cir., 148 F.2d 801 ; Tyrrell v. … We note here that the board found that registrant was in fact a conscientious objector. It is evident that the board raised the question: conscientious objector to what? In White v.

United States v. J.D. Todd

964 F.2d 925 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 19, 1992

FACTS Todd was the teacher-supervisor in charge of discipline at the Lowell Grease-wood Boarding School on the Navajo Reservation in Ganado, Arizona. … The Supreme Court in Hall also rejected the defendant’s reliance on Brown v.

Carlin Constantine Venus v. United States

287 F.2d 304 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 2, 1961

As stated in Parker v. … See also Iver Ikuko Toguri D’Aquino v.

United States v. James William Epperson, United States of America v. Gary Harold Morris

528 F.2d 48 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 9, 1975

We view the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. … Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. at 229 , 93 S.Ct. at 1569 .

Sueoka v. United States

101 F. App'x 649 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 5, 2004

MEMORANDUM * Julie Sueoka, Delnita Brown and Nancy R. … In Goodnight v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Basin Frozen Foods

139 F.3d 906 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 18, 1998

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. BASIN FROZEN FOODS, Respondent. No. 96-70632. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 18, 1998. Argued and Submitted Feb. 3, 1998. … See Kawasaki Motors Manufacturing Corp. v.

United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 1036, Phillip Mulder Charles Buck Leon Gibbons United Foodand Commercial Workers Local 7 United Foodand Commercial Workers Local 951, Intervenors v. National Labor Relations Board, Glenn Hilton United Foodand Commercial Workers Local 951, Respondents-Intervenors. Phillip Mulder Charles Buck Leon Gibbons, and Glenn Hilton v. National Labor Relations Board, Rebecca McReynolds Barbara Kipp, United Foodand Commercial Workers Local 7 United Foodand Commercial Workers Local 951, Intervenors v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board

249 F.3d 1115 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 17, 2001

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER, v. UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION, LOCAL 951, RESPONDENT. … In Ellis v.

Miller v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 498

708 F.2d 467 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 14, 1983

See Hendrix, 592 F.2d at 445-46 ; McLeod v. Business Machine & Office Appliance Me *471 chanics Conference Board Local 459, 300 F.2d 237 , 239-240 (2d Cir.1962). … International Longshoremen’s Association v.

Boyden v. Webb

208 F.2d 201 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 24, 1953

Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 458 and 503-505, 73 S.Ct. 397 , 407 and 437, 444, 445 (Justice Frankfurter’s opinion.) … Brown v. Allen, supra; 28 U.S.C. § 2243 . The judgment of the district court is affirmed. 1 . See Ex parte Boyden, 9 Cir., 205 F.2d 485 ; Boyden v. Smith, 9 Cir., 183 F.2d 189 ; Boyden v.

Carmen Mangaser and Henry Mangaser v. United States

335 F.2d 971 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 20, 1964

The police ascertained defendant Brown and another person, after the robbery, lived at 915 Fulton Street, San Francisco, California, an address not given by Brown to his probation officer. … And see the famous “sea-dog” case, Wong Sun v. United States, 1963, 371 U.S. 471 , 83 S.Ct. 407 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441 ; Jones v. United States, 1960, 362 U.S. 257 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 ; Johnson v.

Richard William Boyd v. United States

269 F.2d 607 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 3, 1959

Kotzen v. Local Exemption Board No. 157, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1918, 252 F. 245, 248 . … In Knox v.

Brooks v. United States

127 F.3d 1192 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 4, 1997

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … See also Dorfmont v.

Edward Barron Estate Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.

93 F.2d 751 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 31, 1937

To similar effect, see Yturbide’s Executors v. United States, 22 How., 63 U.S., 290, 16 L.Ed. 342 , and Muckelroy v. Baldwin, 8 Cir., 70 F.2d 728 . It is said in Poynor v. … See Statler v. Com’r, 27 B.T.A. 342 .

Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local Union 420 v. Kinney Air Conditioning Co.

756 F.2d 742 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 28, 1985

A mere procedural irregularity provides no basis upon which to conclude that the Board acted beyond its authority. See *745 John Wiley & Sons v. … Finally, Kinney failed to object to the selection of the Board members at the time they were seated and has thereby waived this objection. Kodiak Oil Field Haulers, Inc. v.

Miller v. Davis

521 F.3d 1142 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 2, 2008

V, § 8(b). … Ashelman v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Cannery Workers of the Pacific, Affiliated With the Seafarers International Union of North America, Afl-Cio

396 F.2d 955 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 24, 1968

396 F.2d 955 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CANNERY WORKERS OF the PACIFIC, affiliated with the Seafarers International Union of North America, AFL-CIO, Respondent. No. 21680. … PER CURIAM: 1 The above-entitled petition for enforcement of the order of June 21, 1966, issued by the National Labor Relations Board, is granted on the authority of National Labor Relations Board v.

Arnel Gabriel ASTRERO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent

104 F.3d 264 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 30, 1996

This court must uphold the Board’s denial of asylum if it is “supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole”. INS v. … INS v. Rios-Pine *267 da, 471 U.S. 444, 446 , 105 S.Ct. 2098, 2100 , 85 L.Ed.2d 452 (1985). The Board’s decision about whether to grant suspension of deportation is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. INS v.

Stivers v. Pierce

71 F.3d 732 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 1, 1995

Particularly on a small board like the Board before us, a single person’s bias is likely to have a profound impact on the deci-sionmaking process. Cf. Lam v. … See Partington v.