Case law

Laurence G. Limsico v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service

951 F.2d 210 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 9, 1991

V Limsico further contends that the Board’s denial of his motion to reopen violated the intent of Congress to avoid the separation of families. See INS v. … Pope v. Savings Bank of Puget Sound, 850 F.2d 1345, 1356 (9th Cir.1988). PETITION DENIED AND BOARD AFFIRMED.

Dick Lee Evans v. United States

252 F.2d 509 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 2, 1958

All prior classifications given appellant by either the local board or the appeal board were superseded by this last classification, Hinkle v. United States, 9 Cir., 216 F.2d 8, 9 ; Goetz v. … United States v. Balogh, 329 U.S. 692 , 67 S.Ct. 625 , 91 L.Ed. 605 ; United States v. Balogh, 2 Cir., 160 F.2d 999 ; Mason v. United States, 9 Cir., 218 F.2d 375, 379 ; Kalpakoff v.

Dickinson v. United States

203 F.2d 336 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 15, 1953

Appellant has shown no such facts and hence has not shown that any summary was required of the local board.” We followed that case in Tyrrell v. United States, 9 Cir., 200 F.2d 8 . Cf. Knox v. … In Rase v.

National Labor Relations Board, and United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local No. 126, Intervenor v. Edwin R. O'neill, an Individual O'neill, Ltd.

965 F.2d 1522 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 5, 1992

NLRB v. Don Burgess Constr. Corp., 596 F.2d 378 , 383 n. 2 (9th Cir.) (citing Charlotte Telecasters v. … Haley & Haley v. NLRB, 880 F.2d 1147, 1149-50 (9th Cir.1989) (quoting Dariano & Sons, Inc. v. District Council of Painters No. 33, 869 F.2d 514, 518 (9th Cir.1989).

Country Classic Dairies, Inc. v. Montana, Department of Commerce Milk Control Bureau

847 F.2d 593 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 26, 1988

In Brown-Forman Distillers v. N.Y. … In CTS Corp. v.

Lambert v. Richard

59 F.3d 134 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 10, 1995

Sec. 1983 , for violations of Lambert's First and Fourteenth Amendment rights, and under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, California Government Code Sec. 3500 et seq. … Id. 8 The Supreme Court outlined the test for First Amendment protection of government employees' speech in Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968).

Southwest Center For Biological Diversity v. U.S. Forest Service

100 F.3d 1443 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 19, 1996

Browning, District Judge, Presiding, D.C. No. CV-95-00879-WDB. Before: James R. Browning, Dorothy W. Nelson, and Ferdinand F. Fernandez, Circuit Judges. D.W. … The Rustler Sale will remove an estimated 250,000 board feet of dead timber, and it requires no new roads.

Colony Cove Properties, LLC v. City of Carson

640 F.3d 948 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 28, 2011

The analysis is another aid to assist the Board in applying the factors in the Ordinance, as is to be considered in company 4168 COLONY COVE PROPERTIES v. … See Galland v.

Southern California Edison Co. v. Lynch

307 F.3d 943 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 30, 2002

Cooper v. Rimmer

379 F.3d 1029 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 12, 2004

Before: BROWNING, RYMER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges. ORDER The opinion filed February 8, 2004, 358 F.3d 655 , is amended to include Judge Browning's concurrence. … BROWNING, Circuit Judge, concurring: 12 Appellate review of the grant or denial of preliminary injunctive relief requires consideration of the merits of the underlying issue, but it does not decide them. Roe v.

Richard William Boyd v. United States

269 F.2d 607 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 3, 1959

Kotzen v. Local Exemption Board No. 157, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1918, 252 F. 245, 248 . … In Knox v.

Dennis Ex Rel. PICO Holdings, Inc. v. Hart

724 F.3d 1249 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 31, 2013

DENNIS V . HART 7 voted against the 2010 compensation package. The Board took no action in response to the vote. … Hosp. v.

Frost v. Fox

53 F.3d 338 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 26, 1995

See Harper v. … Omar v.

George W. Nulph v. Dave Cook, Director of the Department of Corrections Hardy Myers, Attorney General of the State of Oregon

333 F.3d 1052 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 26, 2003

Id. at 442; see also McClaflin v. … Tex. v.

Sharma v. Holder

633 F.3d 865 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 1, 2011

We denied the petition from the Board’s rejection of his motion to reopen. Id. Similarly, in Ahmed v. … In Damon v.

Edward Schad v. Charles Ryan

732 F.3d 946 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 7, 2013

Ohio Adult Parole Auth. v. Woodward, 523 U.S. 272, 289 (1998) (O’Connor, J., concurring). … See Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008). He contends that there remain serious questions as to the fairness of the Board’s proceedings.

United States v. James William Epperson, United States of America v. Gary Harold Morris

528 F.2d 48 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 9, 1975

We view the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. … Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. at 229 , 93 S.Ct. at 1569 .

Cooper v. Rimmer

379 F.3d 1029 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 8, 2004

ORDER The opinion filed February 8, 2004, 358 F.3d 655 , is amended to include Judge Browning’s concurrence. … Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 102-03 , 97 S.Ct. 285 , 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976); Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 269-70 , 92 S.Ct. 2726 , 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (1972); Gregg v.

Valeria v. Davis

307 F.3d 1036 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 7, 2002

Myers, Inc. v. City & County of San Francisco, 253 F.3d 461, 466 (9th Cir.2001); Neal v. Shimoda, 131 F.3d 818, 823 (9th Cir.1997). … Equity v.

Nat'l Credit Union Admin Board v. Goldman Sachs and Co

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 24, 2016

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION No. 13-56852 ADMINISTRATION BOARD, as Liquidating Agent of U.S. Central Federal D.C. … NATIONAL CREDIT UNION No. 14-55309 ADMINISTRATION BOARD, D.C. No. 2:11-cv-06521-GW-JEM Plaintiff-Appellee, v.