Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca9

10,000+ results

1.87s

  • United States v. Brown

    256 F. App'x 85 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 26, 2007

    Brown appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider its decision not to impose a materially different sentence following a limited remand under United States v. … See United States v. Combs, 470 F.3d 1294, 1296-97 (9th Cir.2006); United States v. Plouffe, 445 F.3d 1126, 1131-32 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 547 U.S. 1158 , 126 S.Ct. 2314 , 164 L.Ed.2d 832 (2006).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kharana v. Gonzales

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 29, 2007

    Petitioner appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA” or “Board”). … The Board did not address whether the petitioner was also deport- able under subsection (M)(i). Id. at 554-55. We interpreted Onyido in Li v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Joye v. Franchise Tax Board

    578 F.3d 1070 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 21, 2009

    The other cases relied on by the Board are also unhelpful. In Schatz v. … Similarly, Ellett v. Stanislaus, 506 F.3d 774 (9th Cir.2007) is of no help to the Board.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • United National Maintenance, Inc. v. San Diego Convention Center, Inc.

    749 F.3d 869 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 14, 2014

    FTC. v. Phoebe Putney Health Sys., Inc., 133 S. Ct. 1003, 1010 (2013) (quoting Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 350 (1943)). … Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 242 (1993) (“Expert testimony is useful as a guide to interpreting market facts, but it is not a substitute for them”).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Giler v. Board of Trustees

    509 F.2d 848 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 3, 1974

    Roark v. Lewis, 130 U.S.App.D.C. 360 , 401 F.2d 425 (1968), adhered to sub nom. Roark v. Boyle, 141 U.S.App.D.C. 390 , 439 F.2d, 497 (1970). In Lee v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    249 F. App'x 587 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 1, 2007

    See United States v. Maciel-Vasquez, 458 F.3d 994, 996 (9th Cir.2006), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 2097 , 167 L.Ed.2d 817 (2007). … Accordingly, we conclude that Brown’s sentence is reasonable. See United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1176 (9th Cir.2006). AFFIRMED.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Benjamin Wai Silva v. Jill Brown, Warden

    416 F.3d 980 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 26, 2005

    Id. at 831 & n. 5; accord, Hayes v. Brown, 399 F.3d 972, 978 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). … See, e.g., Benn v.

    Cited 61 timesPublished
  • Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. County of San Diego

    543 F.3d 571 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 11, 2008

    In MetroPCS, Inc. v. … Most of Sprint’s arguments focus on the discretion reserved to the zoning board.

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Ben Lee Brown v. Walter E. Craven

    424 F.2d 1166 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 13, 1970

    See also Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. at 377-378 , 84 S.Ct. 1774 ; Burns v. Beto, 371 F.2d 598, 603-604 (5th Cir.1966). Cf. Mullins v. United States, 382 F.2d 258, 261-262 (4th Cir.1967); Fisher v. … Compare Good v.

    Cited 186 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    234 F. App'x 452 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 21, 2007

    See United States v. Smith, 390 F.3d 661, 663-64 (9th Cir.2004). In reaching this conclusion, we rely only on Brown’s signed guilty plea and Brown’s admissions during the plea colloquy. 1 See United States v. … These facts establish that Brown committed a second generic burglary. See Taylor, 495 U.S. at 599 , 110 S.Ct. 2143 ; United States v. Sparks, 265 F.3d 825, 835-36 (9th Cir.2001).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    338 F. App'x 697 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 23, 2009

    MEMORANDUM ** Christopher Eastman Brown, a former federal prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. … We review de novo, see United States v. *698 Riedl, 496 F.3d 1003, 1005 (9th Cir.2007), and we affirm.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    222 F. App'x 652 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 27, 2007

    Under Illinois v. … United States v. Padilla, 387 F.3d 1087, 1093 (9th Cir.2004). . Id. (quoting Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291, 300-01 , 100 S.Ct. 1682 , 64 L.Ed.2d 297 (1980)). Cf. United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    223 F. App'x 722 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 1, 2007

    Because Brown did not object to the special release conditions in the district court, we review for plain error. United States v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 441 F.3d 767, 772 (9th Cir.2006). … United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Byron T. Brown

    979 F.2d 1380 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 20, 1992

    United States v. Brown, 763 F.Supp. 1518 (D.Ariz.1991). … United States v. Plummer, 941 F.2d 799, 802 (9th Cir.1991); United States v. Irvine, 756 F.2d 708, 710 (9th Cir.1985). The agreement drafted by the U.S.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Abner J. Morgan, Jr. v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Dba Amtrak

    232 F.3d 1008 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 8, 2000

    In Sosa v. … This suspension was affirmed on appeal to the National Railroad Adjustment Board. 11 .

    Reversed in part, on other grounds by National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101 (2002)Cited 74 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    328 F. App'x 412 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 30, 2009

    See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Brown also contends that the district court abused its discretion by denying his § 2255 motion without an evidentiary hearing. … See United States v. Rodrigues, 347 F.3d 818, 824, 827 (9th Cir.2003). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    338 F. App'x 697 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 23, 2009

    MEMORANDUM ** Christopher Eastman Brown, a former federal prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. … We review de novo, see United States v. *698 Riedl, 496 F.3d 1003, 1005 (9th Cir.2007), and we affirm.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Allen v. Board of Pardons

    792 F.2d 1404 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 26, 1986

    In Winsett v. … Missouri amended its parole statute after the Eighth Circuit’s decision in Williams v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 661 F.2d 697 (8th Cir.1981).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Maurice L. Turner v. Irene Brown Nellie Brown Turner-Thompson

    73 F.3d 370 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 27, 1995

    TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Irene BROWN; Nellie Brown Turner-Thompson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15367. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1995. Decided Dec. 27, 1995. … Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 535 (1981), overruled on other grounds, Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. 327 (1986). Turner fails to show that there was state action, or that he was deprived of a constitutional right.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    223 F. App'x 647 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 28, 2007

    We review de novo, United States v. Rodrigues, 347 F.3d 818, 823 (9th Cir.2003), and we affirm. Brown contends that when the Supreme Court decided United States v. … Assuming arguendo that Booker applies retroactively to Brown’s case, see Caspari v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.