Case law

Edward Lee Brown v. United States

370 F.2d 874 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 1, 1967

Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 , 85 S.Ct. 1229 , 14 L.Ed.2d 106 . … Knowles v. United States, 224 F.2d 168, 170 (10th Cir. 1955). Hayes v. United States, 368 F.2d 814 (9th Cir. 1966).

Endsley v. California ex rel. Brown

627 F. App'x 644 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 17, 2015

Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp., 500 F.3d 1047, 1056-57 (9th Cir.2007) (per curiam) (pre-filing order); Tripati v. … See Simon v. Hartford Life, Inc., 546 F.3d 661, 664 (9th Cir.2008) (discussing the general rule prohibiting pro se plaintiffs from pursuing claims on behalf of others in a representative capacity).

Earth Island Institute v. Brown

28 F.3d 76 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 28, 1994

Earth Island Institute v. Mosbacher, 785 F.Supp. 826, 828 (N.D.Cal.1992). … In K Mart Corp. v.

Don A. Brown v. United States

216 F.2d 258 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 4, 1954

The board acknowledged the receipt of this additional information and advised Brown that his classification would not be reopened or changed. 1 In October, 1952, Brown’s file was sent to the Presidential appeal board and … Stalter, 7 Cir., 151 F.2d 633, 635 ; Knox v. United States, 9 Cir., 200 F.2d 398, 401 ; Dickinson v. United States, supra, 346 U. S. p. 392, 74 S.Ct. 152 ; Jewell v. United States, 6 Cir., 208 F.2d 770, 771 .

Richard Boyde v. Jill Brown, Warden

421 F.3d 1154 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 7, 2005

See, e.g., Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510, 534-38 , 123 S.Ct. 2527 , 156 L.Ed.2d 471 (2003); Silva v. Woodford, 279 F.3d 825 , 847 n. 17, 849-50 (9th Cir.2002); Jackson v. … Boyde v. Brown, 404 F.3d 1159, 1180 (9th Cir.2005) (citing *1156 Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)).

Earth Island Institute v. Brown

17 F.3d 1241 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 3, 1994

Earth Island Institute v. Mosbacher, 785 F.Supp. 826, 828 (N.D.Cal.1992). … In K Mart Corp. v.

Southern Pac. R. v. Brown

75 F. 85 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 19, 1896

Amacker v. Railroad Co., 7 C. C. A. 518 , 58 Fed. 851 ; Railroad Co. v. Maclay, 9 C. C. A. 609 , 61 Fed. 554 ; Newhall v. Sanger, 92 U. S. 761 ;.Railway Co. v. Dunmeyer, 113 U. S. 629 , 5 Sup. Ct. 566; Doolan v. … In Newhall v.

United States v. James Edward Brown

475 F.2d 91 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 27, 1973

United States v. Smith, 456 F.2d 1236 (CA9 1972). At the hearing on remand additional evidence may be presented by both sides on the issue of probable cause. We find appellant’s other contentions to be without merit.

Brown v. Oregonian Publishing Co

647 F.2d 169 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 6, 1981

647 F.2d 169 Brown v. Oregonian Publishing Co. 79-4554 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 4/6/81 1 D.Or. AFFIRMED

United States v. Brown (Steven)

722 F.2d 748 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 21, 1983

722 F.2d 748 U.S. v. Brown (Steven) NO. 83-5101 United States Court of Appeals, ninth Circuit. NOV 21, 1983 1 Appeal From: C.D.Cal. 2 AFFIRMED.

Brown v. Merchants' Marine Ins.

144 F. 85 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 12, 1906

Southern Pac. R. v. Brown

77 F. 271 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 26, 1896

was no assignment of error which raised any question upon this particular point, and for the further and more substantial reason that the respective counsel herein stipulated “that the lands involved in said case against Brown

Gerald Brown and Judy Brown, Husband and Wife v. Hansen Publications, Inc., a Corporation

556 F.2d 969 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 5, 1977

PER CURIAM: Appellants Gerald and Judy Brown brought this action against Hansen Publications, Inc., alleging violations of sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 ,2, and section 2(a) of the Clayton Act, as amended … Lessig v.

Brown v. C. I. R

698 F.2d 1228 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 8, 1982

698 F.2d 1228 Brown v. C. I. R. 81-7131 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 12/8/82 1 U.S.T.C. AFFIRMED

Brown v. Civil Aeronautics Authority

119 F.2d 172 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 16, 1941

Brown of Beverly Hills, California, be suspended for the period of sixty days from the date hereof, and thereafter until he shall have demonstrated to the satisfaction of a designated representative of the Authority, through … On May 17, 1940, Brown petitioned this court to review and set aside respondent’s order. 3 He also moved for a supersedeas, but, as he had not yet taken the examination required by the order, his motion was on June 7, 1940

United States v. Ernest Stephen Brown

438 F.2d 1115 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 17, 1971

In Briggs v. United States, 397 F.2d 370 (9th Cir. 1968), we held the failure to give the registrant the prescribed induction day physical inspection vitiated the order to step forward. … The registrant in Dillon v. United States, 423 F.2d 1121 (9th Cir. 1970) was not given a physical inspection on the day he refused induction.

Brown v. C. I. R

570 F.2d 350 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 28, 1978

570 F.2d 350 Brown v. C. I. R. No. 75-1283, 75-3248, 75-3179, 75-1199, 75-1702, 75-3445, 75-1498, 75-1479 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 2/28/78 1 T.C. AFFIRMED

Brown v. C. I. R

691 F.2d 506 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 25, 1982

691 F.2d 506 Brown v. C. I. R. 81-7296 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 8/25/82 1 U.S.T.C. AFFIRMED

Brown v. Estate of Parrett

760 F.2d 274 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 9, 1985

760 F.2d 274 Brown v. Estate of Parrett 84-5679 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. 4/9/85 1 S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED

Brown (Keith) v. American Airlines

751 F.2d 389 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 3, 1984

751 F.2d 389 Brown (Keith) v. American Airlines NO. 83-5504 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit DEC 03, 1984 1 Appeal From: S.D.Cal. 2 AFFIRMED.