Case law

Brown v. Astrue

267 F. App'x 620 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 20, 2008

Brown argues that the remand should have been for a calculation of benefits. Under these circumstances, we re *622 view the district court’s decision to remand for abuse of discretion. Benecke v. … See Smolen v. Chater, 80 F.3d 1273, 1292 (9th Cir.1996). First, the district court determined that Brown’s lifting limitations may have varied during the relevant period under review.

Brown v. Runnels

251 F. App'x 404 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 17, 2007

See Mitchell v. Esparza, 540 U.S. 12, 18 , 124 S.Ct. 7 , 157 L.Ed.2d 263 (2003). … See Ylst v. Nunnemaker, 501 U.S. 797, 801 , 111 S.Ct. 2590 , 115 L.Ed.2d 706 (1991). .

Richard Gilman v. Edmund Brown, Jr.

814 F.3d 1007 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 22, 2016

Armstrong v. Brown, 768 F.3d 975, 979 (9th Cir. 2014). 14 GILMAN V. BROWN III. … GILMAN V. BROWN 29 5.

Brown v. J.W.

247 F. App'x 82 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 6, 2007

Latman v. Burdette, 366 F.3d 774, 781 (9th Cir.2004). … See Afognak Joint Venture v. Old Harbor Native Corp., 151 P.3d 451, 458 (Alaska 2007).

Shabazz v. Brown

234 F. App'x 793 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 13, 2007

See Amaya-Ruiz v. Stewart, 121 F.3d 486, 489 (9th Cir.1997); de Kaplany v. Enomoto, 540 F.2d 975, 982 (9th Cir. 1976).

DeSosa v. Brown

357 F. App'x 901 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 14, 2009

The district court did not err in concluding that DeSosa failed to establish either deficient performance or resulting prejudice under the standard announced in Strickland v. … See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(1); Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63, 72-73 , 123 S.Ct. 1166 , 155 L.Ed.2d 144 (2003); see also Rios v.

Elizabeth Haskell v. Edmund Brown, Jr.

669 F.3d 1049 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 23, 2012

Bell v. … Most recently, in Hamilton v. Brown, 630 F.3d 889 (9th Cir.2011), we held that California’s requirement that prison inmates must provide blood samples for DNA identification comports with the Fourth Amendment.

Wilmshurst v. Brown

231 F. App'x 555 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 30, 2007

We review de novo a district court’s decision to abstain on Younger grounds, Dubinka v. Judges of Superior Court of State of Cal. for County of Los Angeles, 23 F.3d 218, 221 (9th Cir.1994), and we affirm. … The district court properly dismissed Wilmshurst’s action pursuant to Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971).

Barraza v. Brown

234 F. App'x 780 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 13, 2007

. § 2254 (d); Smith v. Phillips, 455 U.S. 209, 217 , 102 S.Ct. 940 , 71 L.Ed.2d 78 (1982). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

DeSosa v. Brown

357 F. App'x 901 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 14, 2009

The district court did not err in concluding that DeSosa failed to establish either deficient performance or resulting prejudice under the standard announced in Strickland v. … See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(1); Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63, 72-73 , 123 S.Ct. 1166 , 155 L.Ed.2d 144 (2003); see also Rios v.

Brown v. Investors Mortgage Co.

121 F.3d 472 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 29, 1997

Brown argues applying DIDMCA to these intrastate loans violates the Commerce Clause as interpreted in United States v. … V. Finally, Brown asserts the IMC loan is both procedurally and substantively unconscionable.

Brown v. Mahoney

338 F. App'x 688 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 22, 2009

Brown appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition challenging the Montana Board of Pardons and Parole’s (“Board”) 2003 decision finding him unsuitable for parole. … As Brown acknowledges, this contention is foreclosed by Neal v. Shimoda, 131 F.3d 818 (9th Cir.1997).

Brown v. Conway

228 F. App'x 795 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 20, 2007

Upon review, we conclude that Brown has failed to show that his attorneys committed unprofessional errors that were prejudicial to his case. See Strickland v. … We construe Brown’s uncertified contentions as a motion to expand the Certificate of Appealability, and we deny the motion. See 9th Cir. R. 22-l(e); Hiivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam).

Brown v. Horel

339 F. App'x 757 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 30, 2009

Unlike the prosecutor in Bean v. … Fry v. Pliler, 551 U.S. 112 , 127 S.Ct. 2321, 2328 , 168 L.Ed.2d 16 (2007).

Brown v. Roe

224 F. App'x 713 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 16, 2007

See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(1); Strickland v. … We construe Brown’s briefing of uncertified issues as a motion to expand the certificate of appealability. See 9th Cir. R. 22-l(e). So construed, we deny the motion. See Hiivala v.

Brown v. City of Los Angeles

521 F.3d 1238 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 10, 2008

In January 2006, LAPD determined it could not accommodate Brown’s restrictions, but as of April 2006, no determination had been made on Brown’s application for benefits. … Suzuki Motor Corp. v. Consumers Union, Inc., 330 F.3d 1110, 1131 (9th Cir.2003); Arakaki v. Hawaii, 314 F.3d 1091, 1094 (9th Cir.2002).

Brown v. Shinseki

336 F. App'x 591 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 17, 2009

Walton v. U.S. Marshals Serv., 492 F.3d 998, 1005 (9th Cir.2007). … Collings v. Longview Fibre Co., 63 F.3d 828, 833 (9th Cir.1995).

Harris v. Brown

338 F. App'x 660 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 16, 2009

See Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 757 , 90 S.Ct. 1463 , 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970); see also McMann v. … See People v.

Harris v. Brown

338 F. App'x 660 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 16, 2009

See Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 757 , 90 S.Ct. 1463 , 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970); see also McMann v. … See People v.

Beltran v. Brown

207 F. App'x 786 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 15, 2006

We review de novo a district court’s grant of summary judgment, Henderson v. City of Simi Valley, 305 F.3d 1052, 1055 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm. … See Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 397 , 109 S.Ct. 1865 , 104 L.Ed.2d 443 (1989) (police may use only such force as is objectively reasonable under the circumstances); Saucier v.