Case law

Brown v. California Department of Corrections

554 F.3d 747 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 22, 2009

Brown also sued the parole board members, the California Department of Corrections, the California Board of Prison Terms, and the prison warden. … BACKGROUND Brown’s claims stem from our grant of Brown’s habeas petition in Brown v. Poole, 337 F.3d 1155 (9th Cir.2003).

Moore v. Brown

295 F. App'x 176 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 26, 2008

Moore v. Lockyer, 2005 WL 2334350 , at *9 (N.D.Cal. Sept.23, 2005) (quoting United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 682 , 105 S.Ct. 3375 , 87 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985)). … Lucido v. Superior Court, 51 Cal.3d 335 , 272 Cal.Rptr. 767 , 795 P.2d 1223, 1225 (1990).

Brown v. Lindsey

16 F. App'x 764 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 13, 2001

Brown’s habeas petition. See Lockhart v. Terhune, 250 F.3d 1223, 1228 (9th Cir.2001). Because Mr. … Brown’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel under Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201 , 84 S.Ct. 1199 , 12 L.Ed.2d 246 (1964), and United States v. Henry, 447 U.S. 264 , 100 S.Ct. 2183 , 65 L.Ed.2d 115 (1980).

Brown v. Kimoto

291 F. App'x 50 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 19, 2008

Brown contends that the district court erred in concluding that venue was improper in Hawaii. … See Myers v. Bennett Law Offices, 238 F.3d 1068, 1071 (9th Cir.2001); King v. Russell, 963 F.2d 1301 (9th Cir.1992).

Brown v. Hickman

279 F. App'x 573 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 27, 2008

As a threshold matter, we reject the state’s contention that Brown’s claim was procedurally defaulted under In re Dixon, 41 Cal.2d 756, 759 , 264 P.2d 513 (1953). See Park v. … Brown’s request that we remand to the district court to reopen discovery and to conduct an evidentiary hearing is denied. See Sims v. Brown, 425 F.3d 560, 577 (9th Cir.2005). AFFIRMED.

Avery v. Brown

11 F. App'x 742 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 28, 2001

See Barnett v. Centoni, 31 F.3d 813, 815 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam). … See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104-06 , 97 S.Ct. 285 , 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976); Jackson v. McIntosh, 90 F.3d 330, 332 (9th Cir.1996).

Brown v. Henry

9 F. App'x 719 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 25, 2001

Those findings support the conclusion that denial of Brown’s mistrial motion did not render his trial fundamentally unfair. See Jeffries v. Blodgett, 5 F.3d 1180, 1192 (9th Cir.1993). … We do not consider the remaining claims raised in Brown’s opening brief as no certificate of appealability was granted with respect to those issues. 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c); Gatlin v.

Small ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Ass'n Local 200

611 F.3d 483 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 8, 2010

NLRB v. … NLRB v.

Tom Hudson & Associates, Inc., and Tom Hudson v. City of Chula Vista, Sca Services Inc., and Chula Vista Sanitary Service, Inc.

746 F.2d 1370 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 5, 1984

Brown to actions of state agencies, see Bates v. … The actions of a private person are not exempt from federal antitrust laws under Parker v. Brown unless actively supervised by the State. California Liquor Dealers v.

Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. Brown

640 F.3d 1063 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 17, 2011

NEDC v. BROWN 6415 Our caselaw has consistently recognized the distinction between nonpoint and point source runoff. In Natural Resources Defense Council v. … Reg. 6282  NEDC v. BROWN 6429 (Feb. 12, 1976).

Hooey v. Brown

277 F. App'x 717 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 7, 2008

Jamerson v. Brown

4 F. App'x 469 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 22, 2001

Bateman v. United States Postal Serv., 231 F.3d 1220, 1223 (9th Cir.2000). … Life Ins. & Annuity Co. v. Llewellyn, 139 F.3d 664 , 666 (9th Cir.1997); cf.

Antonyan v. Holder

642 F.3d 1250 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 29, 2011

See Zhu v. … As a result, the Board con- cluded, Antonyan failed to satisfy her burden of establishing eligibility for CAT relief.

Brown v. Reno

2 F. App'x 799 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 24, 2001

MEMORANDUM 3 Kenneth Roy Brown, a native and citizen of Jamaica, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) summary dismissal of his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his … Because Brown failed to address the BIA’s summary dismissal or discuss the adequacy of his notice of appeal to the BIA, he has waived the right to challenge that dismissal. See Martinez-Serrano v.

Betty Jean Brown, a Minor, by Owen Walter Brown, Her Guardian Ad Litem, and Owen Walter Brown v. United States

353 F.2d 578 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 16, 1965

Betty Jean Brown, a minor, was born prematurely on February 21, 1955, in the United States Naval Hospital at Corpus Christi, Texas. … Hungerford v. United States, 307 F.2d 99, 102 (9th Cir. 1962); Quinton v. United States, 304 F.2d 234 (5th Cir. 1962).

Brown v. Hill

267 F. App'x 630 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 20, 2008

Palmateer, 397 F.3d 1236, 1243 (9th Cir.2005); see also Strickland v. … Van Lynn v. Farmon, 347 F.3d 735, 738 (9th Cir. 2003).

Boeing Airplane Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Virginia Brown and Albert K. Brown, Jr., by His General Guardian, Virginia Brown

291 F.2d 310 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 22, 1961

Brown, Sr., a member of the crew, lost his life in the accident. He left a minor son in whose behalf this action was brought against Boeing. … The judgment is affirmed. 1 . 28 U.S.C.A. § 1652 ; Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Mfg. Co., Inc., 313 U.S. 487 , 61 S.Ct. 1020 , 85 L.Ed. 1477 ; Hall v. Copco Pacific, Ltd., 9 Cir., 224 F.2d 884, 885 . 2 . Bogitch v.

Vaught v. Scottsdale Healthcare

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 29, 2008

VAUGHT v. … the Board . . . shall be considered by the court’ ”) (alterations in original)).

Ahmed v. Mukasey

548 F.3d 768 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 19, 2008

STANDARD OF REVIEW This court “review[s] BIA rulings on motions to reopen ... for abuse of discretion and reverse[s] only if the Board acted arbitrarily, irrationally, or contrary to law.” Mohammed v. … More importantly, Board members must “exercise their independent judgement and discretion in considering and determining the cases coming before the Board.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1 (d)(l)(ii).

Fuentez v. Brown

256 F. App'x 966 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 28, 2007

See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). … See Blackledge v. Allison, 431 U.S. 63, 75-76 , 97 S.Ct. 1621 , 52 L.Ed.2d 136 (1977).