Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Red River Lumber Co.

109 F.2d 157 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 16, 1940

V. … See Red River Lumber Co. v. Cardenas, 9 Cir., 95 F.2d 157 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Sav-On Drugs, Inc.

728 F.2d 1254 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 21, 1984

The Board found that the pharmacist managers were not supervisors and that the Guild was a labor organization within the meaning of the Act. The • Board ordered an election. We en *1256 forced that order. NLRB v. … See Walla Walla Union-Bulletin v. NLRB, 631 F.2d 609, 615 (9th Cir.1980); Sakrete of Northern California, Inc. v.

Gennifer Flowers v. James Carville Hillary Rodham Clinton Little, Brown & Co. George Stephanopoulos

310 F.3d 1118 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 12, 2002

Flowers filed this diversity suit in November 1999 in the United States District Court in Nevada, naming James Carville, George Stephanopoulos and Little, Brown & Co. (Stephanopoulos’s publisher) as defendants. … Ry. v. Eggen, 252 U.S. 553 , 40 S.Ct. 402 , 64 L.Ed. 713 (1920). But after Saenz v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Stationary Engineers, Local 39

746 F.2d 530 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 30, 1984

The Board filed an application for enforcement of its order on December 20, 1983. II We must determine whether substantial evidence supports the Board’s factual findings. Universal Camera Corp. v. … See also NLRB v.

John Gillibeau v. City Of Richmond

417 F.2d 426 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 13, 1969

417 F.2d 426 John GILLIBEAU and Doris Gillibeau, Appellants, v. CITY OF RICHMOND, a municipal corporation, Charles E. Brown, Elmer Evans, Deputy Marshal, Ervin R. Martin, Deputy Marshal, William H. … York v.

National Labor Relations Board v. John Stepp's Friendly Ford, Inc.

338 F.2d 833 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 2, 1964

As stated in Brooks v. … Brooks v. National Labor Relations Board (1954) 348 U.S. 96 , 75 S.Ct. 176 . 6 . NLRB v. Armato (7 Cir. 1962) 199 F. 2d 800 ; NLRB v. John S. Swift Co. Inc. (7 Cir. 1962) 302 F.2d 342 . 7 . NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. East Wind Enterprises

664 F.2d 754 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 4, 1981

PER CURIAM: There is solid, substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s determination that the employee was discharged for union activities. … The Board requests that in this case we grant an award of attorney’s fees against the petitioner for having taken a frivolous appeal to delay enforcement.

South Tacoma Motor Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

207 F.2d 184 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 18, 1953

N.L.R.B. v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Citizen News Co., 9 Cir., 1943, 134 F.2d 970, 974 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Whitin Machine Works, 1 Cir., 1953, 204 F.2d 883, 884 . 4 . Cf. N.L.R.B. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Heath Tec Division/san Francisco

566 F.2d 1367 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 5, 1978

In General Engineering, Inc. v. … As this court said in N.L.R.B. v.

Hill v. State Board of Control

72 F. App'x 680 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 15, 2003

Assoc, of Naturopathic Physicians v. Hayhurst, 227 F.3d 1104, 1109 (9th Cir.2000). We review for abuse of discretion the district court’s denial of a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion, Bateman v.

East Bay Automotive Council v. National Labor Relations Board

483 F.3d 628 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 16, 2007

Jason, National Labor Relations Board, were also on the brief. 4296 EAST BAY AUTOMOTIVE v. … [1] The Board’s power to fashion remedies is “a broad dis- cretionary one, subject to limited judicial review.” Fibreboard 4300 EAST BAY AUTOMOTIVE v. NLRB Paper Prods. Corp. v.

Premium Foods, Incorporated, and v. National Labor Relations Board, And

709 F.2d 623 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 1, 1983

(Premium) petitions for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (Board), reported at 260 N.L.R.B. No. 92 (1982). … The Board ordered Premium to recognize and bargain with United Food & Commercial Workers Local Union No. 1439 (Union). The Board cross-petitions for enforcement of its order. We enforce the Board’s order.

National Labor Relations Board v. International Association of Bridge, Structural and Reinforced Iron Workers Union, Local 378, Afl-Cio

532 F.2d 1241 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 16, 1976

In making this determination, the Board acts with broad discretion. In NLRB v. … BROWNING, Circuit Judge, would hold that the Board’s Order is supported by substantial evidence in the record, and would enforce it. 1 . NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Pinkerton's Nat. Detective Agency, Inc.

202 F.2d 230 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 29, 1953

Thus in National Labor Relations Board v. Newspaper & Mail. Del. … National Labor Relations Board v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Sun Tent-Luebbert Co.

154 F.2d 108 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 2, 1946

The Supreme Court in its opinion in National Labor Relations Board v. … “The court found warrant for its excision of this provision in [National] Labor Relations Board v. Express Pub. Co., supra ( 312 U.S. 426, 433 , 61 S.Ct. 693 , 85 L.Ed. 930 ).

Press Democrat Publishing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

629 F.2d 1320 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 8, 1980

.; and Brown Newspaper Publishing Co. (collectively, the “Employers”), which publish several suburban newspapers in the Bay Area. … The Board has broad discretion in fashioning decrees to remedy violations of the Act, N. L. R. B. v.

Markair, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Transamerica Airlines, Inc., Intervenor

744 F.2d 1383 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 12, 1984

Toohey v. Nitze, 429 F.2d 1332, 1334 (9th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1022 (1971). The interpretation of a statute by the agency charged with administering it is entitled to deference. NLRB v. … See Toohey, 419 F.2d at 1334. *1387 Ill CONCLUSION The order of the Civil Aeronautics Board is REVERSED and REMANDED.

Moore v. National Transportation Safety Board

67 F. App'x 490 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 18, 2003

Kolek v. Engen, 869 F.2d 1281, 1285 (9th Cir.1989) (quoting 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A)). We deny the petition for review. … See Kolek, 869 F.2d at 1286 ; see also 49 C.F.R. § 821.61 (b)(2) (“[e]x parte communications solely relating to matters of Board procedure or practice are not prohibited”).

United States v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co.

455 F.2d 432 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 6, 1971

Co. v. Risty, 276 U.S. 567 , 48 S.Ct. 396 , 72 L.Ed. 703 (1928); First National Bank of Greeley v. Board of Commissioners of Weld County, 264 U.S. 450 , 44 S.Ct. 385 , 68 L.Ed. 784 (1924); Prentis v. … Cross-appeal of Hugh Brown in Appeal No. 25241 On August 26, 1971, the cross-appeal of Hugh Brown was dismissed by a motion panel of this court for lack of prosecution.

DiLoreto v. Downey Unified School District Board of Education

196 F.3d 958 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 8, 1999

DiLoreto v. Board of Educ., 74 Cal.App.4th 267 , 87 Cal.Rptr.2d 791 (1999). In the federal action, the District Court denied Mr. … See Lehman v.