Case law

Warren L. Smith v. The State of California, Edmund G. Brown, Governor

336 F.2d 530 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 9, 1964

Justice Field in the case of Dent v. … (E. g., State Board of Examiners v. Standard Engineering Co., 1928, 157 Tenn. 157 , 7 S.W.2d 47 ).

National Labor Relations Board v. Inglewood Park Cemetery Association

355 F.2d 448 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 14, 1966

Polish Alliance v. [National] Labor [Relations] Board, 322 U.S., [643] at 648 [ 64 S.Ct. 1196, at 1199 , 88 L.Ed. 1509 ]. See also [National] Labor [Relations] Board v. … We have held that a dry-cleaning establishment doing approximately $12,000 per year in interstate business fell within the jurisdiction of the Board. N. L. R. B. v.

United States v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 3, 2025

Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:21-cr-00467-JSW-1 v. MEMORANDUM* AARON PIERRE BROWN, Defendant - Appellant. … We review Brown’s procedural arguments for plain error, and the substantive reasonableness of the sentence for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010).

TCI West, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

145 F.3d 1113 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 9, 1998

See NLRB v. … .”); NLRB v.

H.G. GIBSON, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD, Respondent

118 F.3d 1312 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 7, 1997

Air California v. United States Dept. of Transp., 654 F.2d 616 , 620-22 (9th Cir.1981). In Air California, we noted that the Supreme Court, in Abbott Laboratories v. … Air California, 654 F.2d at 620 (citing Federal Trade Comm. v.

Hason v. University of California Board of Regents

35 F. App'x 340 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 21, 2002

See Stretten v. … Accordingly, the district court properly granted the University of California Board of Regents’ motion for summary judgment. See Forsberg, 840 F.2d at 1419 .

Retlaw Broadcasting Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

53 F.3d 1002 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 26, 1995

Haagen-son’s union, the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (“AFTRA”), filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”). … Fun Striders, Inc. v. NLRB, 686 F.2d 659, 661-62 (9th Cir.1981) (citations and quotations omitted). See Teledyne Indus., Inc. v.

Southern Pacific Transportation Company v. James M. Brown

651 F.2d 613 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 30, 1980

Simon v. … Johnson v.

Virginia Mason Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board

558 F.3d 891 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 10, 2009

In addition, the Board’s interpretation of its own remedial order “enjoys a good deal of discretion.” NLRB v. Nat’l Med. Hosp. of Compton, 907 F.2d 905, 909 (9th Cir.1990). … Brooks v. NLRB, 348 U.S. 96, 103 , 75 S.Ct. 176 , 99 L.Ed. 125 (1954). A.

National Labor Relations Board v. Pine Products Corporation

361 F.2d 480 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 12, 1966

PER CURIAM: The National Labor Relations Board has found that respondent violated section 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National 61 Stat. 140 , as amended, 73 Stat. 525 (1959), 29 U.S.C. § 158 (a) (3), (1) (1964), by discharging … On review the sole question is whether the Board’s findings are sup *481 ported by substantial evidence on the whole record. We conclude that they are and that the order is entitled to enforcement. It is so ordered.

National Labor Relations Board v. Adams Delivery Service, Inc.

623 F.2d 96 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 10, 1980

Stephenson v. N.L.R.B., 614 F.2d 1210 (9th Cir. 1980). The Board has the burden of proving that a discharge was motivated by anti-union animus. L’Eggs Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 619 F.2d 1337, 1341 (9th Cir. 1980). … See N.L.R.B. v. Lantz, 607 F.2d 290, 298 (9th Cir. 1979); N.L.R.B. v. R. W. Little, Inc., 493 F.2d 1245 (9th Cir. 1974); Inter-Polymer Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 480 F.2d 631, 633 (9th Cir. 1973); N.L.R.B. v.

The Conolon Corporation v. The National Labor Relations Board

431 F.2d 324 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 4, 1970

In any event, the question was for the Board to decide. “The determination of the category into which the remarks fell was a question of fact for the Board, National Labor Relations *328 Board v. … The Board approved the *329 examiner’s finding with change or comment. The Act is violated when the employer withholds overtime from an employee because of the employee’s union activity. N. L. R. B. v.

Pioneer Inn Associates v. National Labor Relations Board

578 F.2d 835 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 19, 1978

Co. v. NLRB, 536 F.2d 1192, 1194 (7th Cir. 1976); Ingress-Plastene, Inc. v. NLRB, 430 F.2d 542, 547 (7th Cir. 1970). The Board has admitted as much in Sierra Development Co. d/b/a Club Cal-Neva, 231 NLRB No. 5 (1977). … We are bound to enforce the Board’s decision if it is supported by substantial evidence viewing the record in its entirety. Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); NLRB v.

International In-Flight Catering Co. v. National Mediation Board

555 F.2d 712 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 10, 1977

They rely on Switchmen’s Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943). … United States v. Proctor & Gamble Co., 356 U.S. 677, 681 , 78 S.Ct. 983 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1958) (discovery rules).

Barancik v. County of Marin

872 F.2d 834 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 19, 1989

On appeal to the Marin County Board of Supervisors, the Board on February 5,1985 affirmed the denial. … Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261 , 105 S.Ct. 1938 , 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985) was decided on April 17,1985. Accordingly, the governing statute of limitations was a one-year statute. Gibson v.

Chen v. Garland

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 14, 2023

Mukulumbutu v. Barr, 977 F.3d 924, 926 (9th Cir. 2020). … Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1044 (9th Cir. 2010).

Retlaw Broadcasting Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

172 F.3d 660 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 30, 1999

Ass’n, Inc. v. NLRB, 939 F.2d 1392 , 1403-05 (10th Cir.1991). The possibility of impasse, therefore, is a bargaining tool for both sides and an “integral part” of collective bargaining on mandatory subjects. Brown v. … Brown v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Int’l Union Local 54, 468 U.S. 491, 503 , 104 S.Ct. 3179 , 82 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984).

National Labor Relations Board v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, Inc.

106 F.2d 867 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 19, 1939

National Labor Relations Board v. Carlisle Lumber Co., 9 Cir., 99 F.2d 533, 538 . … We regard the contract, as modified, then to be binding on the employees and on the company and not affected by the fact that undetermined proceedings were pending before the Board. Consolidated Edison Co. v.

Sahara-Tahoe Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

648 F.2d 553 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 28, 1980

The Board’s decision will be upheld if it is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole.” Id. at 579, citing Sahara-Tahoe Corp. v. … The Board’s order is ENFORCED. . See, NLRB v. Tahoe Nugget; Sahara-Tahoe Corporation v. NLRB; NLRB v. Sierra Development Co., 604 F.2d 606 (9th Cir. 1979); NLRB v. Carda Hotels, 604 F.2d 605 (9th Cir. 1979); NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Fishermen's & Allied Workers'union

483 F.2d 952 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 31, 1973

P 13,946 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. FISHERMEN'S & ALLIED WORKERS'UNION, LOCAL #33 OF SAN DIEGO AND SAN PEDRO, INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S AND WAREHOUSEMEN'S UNION, Respondent. No. 72-3110. … See Intalco Aluminum Corp. v.