Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Howard-Cooper Corporation

259 F.2d 558 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 6, 1958

In National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Trimfit of Calif., 9 Cir., 1954, 211 F.2d 206 , and National Labor Relations Board v.

Jeffrey J. Biggs v. Cal A. Terhune, Director of Wbs/jfm CDC California Board of Prison Terms Board of Prison Terms

334 F.3d 910 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 30, 2003

V, XIV. … The Supreme Court in Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal, 442 U.S. 1, 7, 11-12 , 99 S.Ct. 2100 , 60 L.Ed.2d 668 (1979), and Board. of Pardons v.

Humes Electric, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

715 F.2d 468 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 7, 1983

The Supreme Court has recently held that the Board can properly place the burden of proving this affirmative defense on the employer. N.L.R.B. v. … The Board’s order shall be ENFORCED.

National Labor Relations Board v. C. W. Hume Co.

180 F.2d 445 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 31, 1950

180 F.2d 445 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. C. W. HUME CO. et al. (INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, A.F.L. et al. Intervenors). No. 11693. … N.L.R.B. v. Electric Vacuum Cleaner Co., 315 U.S. 685, 694 , 62 S.Ct. 846 , 86 L.Ed. 1120 , N.L.R.B. v. Don Juan, Inc. 2 Cir., 1949, 178 F.2d 625 . Compare Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Continental Nut Company

395 F.2d 830 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 8, 1968

In N.L.R.B. v. … See also N.L.R.B. v. Cadillac Steel Products Corp., 355 F.2d 191, 192 (CA 9) ; N.L.R.B. v. Sumner Sand and Gravel Co., 293 F.2d 754, 755 (CA 9); N.L.R.B. v.

William Hawkins, III v. the Franchise Tax Board of Cal

769 F.3d 662 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 15, 2014

The California Franchise Tax Board (“FTB”) assessed $15.3 million in additional taxes, penalties, and interest for the same tax years. Hawkins made an offer in compromise to the IRS of $8 million, which was rejected. … See, e.g., Vaughn v.

Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP v. Marland

319 F. App'x 676 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 19, 2009

the first (Thelen I), the district court granted partial summary judgment against Mar-land and denied Marland’s motion for summary judgment, finding that a 2002 agreement between Marland and his prior counsel, Thelen Reid Brown … See Entm’t Research Group, Inc. v. Genesis Creative Group, Inc., 122 F.3d 1211 , 1217 (9th Cir.1997).

Fresh International Corp. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

805 F.2d 1353 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 9, 1986

Champion International Corp. v. Brown, 731 F.2d 1406, 1408 (9th Cir.1984) (citing Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. at 44 , 91 S.Ct. at 750 ). … BCI relies primarily on our decision in Champion International Corp. v. Brown, 731 F.2d 1406 (9th Cir.1984).

National Labor Relations Board v. Ambrose Distributing Company

382 F.2d 92 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 26, 1967

The Board’s Petition for Adjudication in Civil Contempt contains the following allegations: “II. … this court upon petition of the Board when these proceedings are finally concluded. 3.

Southwest Forest Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

841 F.2d 270 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 1, 1988

NLRB v. Carilli, 648 F.2d 1206, 1214 (9th Cir.1981). … Southwest contends that the Board’s remedial order is at odds with Circuit Court precedent. The first case Southwest cites is Rayner v. NLRB, 665 F.2d 970 (9th Cir.1982).

James F. Armstrong v. Alec W. Brown and Lester J. Gendron

352 F.2d 1023 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 15, 1965

The order dismissing the complaint in this Civil Rights Act damage suit, without leave to amend, is reversed and remanded for the same reasons which have required reversal and remand of Armstrong v.

Hawaii Meat Company, Limited v. National Labor Relations Board

321 F.2d 397 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 5, 1963

Brown-Dunkin Co., 10 Cir., 1961, 287 F.2d 17 ; Jays Foods, Inc. v. NLRB, 7 Cir., 1961, 292 F.2d 317 ; NLRB v. Rapid Bindery, Inc., 2 Cir., 1961, 293 F.2d 170 ; NLRB v. Lassing, 6 Cir., 1960, 284 F.2d 781 ; NLRB v. … NLRB v. Brown-Dunkin Co., supra; see NLRB v. Rapid Bindery, Inc., supra.

Pacific Maritime Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

452 F.2d 8 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 24, 1971

The Board has advanced the contention that once an employer assigns a union as its exclusive hiring agent, it is jointly liable for any discriminatory acts which occur, and cites Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. … The Board’s findings are shown to be supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).

National Labor Relations Board v. The Bakersfield Californian

128 F.3d 1339 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 19, 1997

See EEOC v. Children’s Hosp. Med. … See Casey v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Tom Joyce Floors, Inc.

353 F.2d 768 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 4, 1965

N.L.R.B. v. Katz, 369 U.S. 736 , 82 S.Ct. 1107 , 8 L.Ed.2d 230 . The Court in Katz did indicate that there might be circumstances which the Board could or should accept as justifying unilateral action. … But in N.L.R.B. v.

Lancaster v. Board of Prison Terms

234 F. App'x 588 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 13, 2007

Lancaster contends that the California Board of Prison Terms’ (the “Board”) decision to deny him parole violated his due process rights. … See United States v. DiFrancesco, 449 U.S. 117, 129, 137 , 101 S.Ct. 426 , 66 L.Ed.2d 328 (1980). Lancaster also contends that the Board violated the doctrine of separation of government powers.

International Longshoremen's Union, Local 32 v. Pacific Maritime Ass'n

773 F.2d 1012 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 7, 1985

See e.g., Local Joint Executive Board v. Royal Center, Inc., 754 F.2d 835 (9th Cir.1985); Carpenters’ Local Union No. 1478 v. Stevens, 743 F.2d 1271, 1278 (9th Cir.1984); see also Howard Johnson Co. v. … Detroit Local Joint Executive Board, 417 U.S. 249, 262 , 94 S.Ct. 2236, 2243 , 41 L.Ed.2d 46 (1974); Carey v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 375 U.S. 261, 272 , 84 S.Ct. 401, 409 , 11 L.Ed.2d 320 (1964).

National Labor Relations Board v. International Medication Systems, Ltd.

640 F.2d 1110 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 8, 1981

The Board replies that the respondent’s assertion of irrelevance is frivolous. … UAW v. NLRB, 459 F.2d 1329, 1346-47 (D.C.Cir.1972) (Board erred in failing to draw adverse inference from party’s failure to produce subpoenaed documents, even though enforcement had not been sought in district court).

National Labor Relations Board v. Carda Hotels, Inc.

604 F.2d 605 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 1, 1979

P 11,536 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, and Hotel-Motel-Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union Local 86, Hotel& Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union, AFL-CIO, Intervenor, v. … The Board's Order must be enforced. 2 The central issues raised by this appeal have recently been squarely addressed and resolved. See N.L.R.B. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Flotill Products, Inc.

180 F.2d 441 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 24, 1950

Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. N.L.R.B., 338 U.S. 355 , 70 S.Ct. 166 . … Consolidated Edison Co. v. N.L.R.B., supra; Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. N.L.R.B., supra.