Case law

Cable Car Advertisers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

53 F. App'x 467 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 18, 2002

NLRB v. Int’l Ass’n of Bridge, Structural and Reinforced Iron Wrks, Local 378, 532 F.2d 1241, 1242 (9th Cir.1976). … M Rests., Inc. v. NLRB, 621 F.2d 336, 337-38 (9th Cir.1980); NLRB v. Carpenters Union, 433 F.2d 934, 935 (1970).

National Labor Relations Board v. Security Plating Company, Inc.

356 F.2d 725 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 25, 1966

Security urges that the evidence is insufficient to support the Board’s order. N.L.R.B. v. Mrak Coal Co., 322 F.2d 311, 313 (9th Cir. 1963); Snow v. N.L.R.B., 308 F.2d 687, 691 (9th Cir. 1962). … N.L.R.B. v. Trimfit of California, supra, 211 F.2d 210 . N.L.R.B. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Alaska S. S. Co.

211 F.2d 357 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 26, 1954

The Board’s determination that his name was dropped on that consideration alone is substantially supported by the evidence. … B. v. Pinkerton’s Nat. Detective Agency, 9 Cir., 202 F.2d 230, 231-232 . Cf. also Radio Officers’ Union of Commercial Telegraphers Union, A. F. L. v. N. L. R. B., 347 U.S. 17 , 74 S.Ct. 323 .

Mark Weinberg Randy Powers Elizabeth Powers v. Whatcom County Nathan W. Brown

241 F.3d 746 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 27, 2001

Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … See Harris v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Don Burgess Construction Corporation

596 F.2d 378 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 4, 1979

P 11,305 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, and Sequoia District Council of Carpenters, Intervenor, v. … We are not to overturn the Board's decision unless it is "arbitrary and capricious." See Packard Motor Car Co. v. NLRB, 330 U.S. 485, 491 , 67 S.Ct. 789 , 91 L.Ed. 1040 (1947); Victoria Station v.

National Labor Relations Board v. General Electric Company

411 F.2d 750 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 7, 1969

We read the Board’s interpretation of the National Labor Relations Act more narrowly than does the respondent. … We think the Board’s interpretation and conclusions are reasonable. The petition for enforcement is therefore granted.

Metlox Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations Board

378 F.2d 728 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 5, 1967

Curtiss-Wright Corp., Wright Aeronautical Div. v. NLRB, 347 F.2d 61, 68 (3d Cir. 1965). … The petition for review will be denied, and the Board’s order will be enforced. And see the Full Board’s summary of its holding in this case in White Furniture Co., 161 N.L.R.B.

National Labor Relations Board v. Kinner Motors, Inc.

152 F.2d 816 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 29, 1945

Petitions by the Board for enforcement of orders of the National Labor Relations Board in cases No. 10,984 and 10,-956 are before us. … In our opinion such order is directly in conflict with the salutary statement of the Supreme Court in National Labor Relations Board v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Ambrose Distributing Company

382 F.2d 92 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 26, 1967

The Board’s Petition for Adjudication in Civil Contempt contains the following allegations: “II. … this court upon petition of the Board when these proceedings are finally concluded. 3.

Lee v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

7 F. App'x 658 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 26, 2001

(“Board”). … See Allah v. Superior Court, 871 F.2d 887, 890-91 (9th Cir.1989). In addition, Lee’s claims against the Board are barred by the Eleventh Amendment. See Brooks v. Sulphur Springs Valley Elec.

Western Watersheds Project v. Interior Board of Land Appeals

624 F.3d 983 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 12, 2010

After the Appeals Board denied reconsideration, Western Watersheds filed in the district court pursuant to the APA and 17034 WESTERN WATERSHEDS v. INTERIOR BD. … Finally, while we are under no obligation to defer to the Appeals Board’s interpretation of the EAJA, see Amer. Pac. Concrete Pipe Co. v.

Lancaster v. Board of Prison Terms

234 F. App'x 588 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 13, 2007

Lancaster contends that the California Board of Prison Terms’ (the “Board”) decision to deny him parole violated his due process rights. … See United States v. DiFrancesco, 449 U.S. 117, 129, 137 , 101 S.Ct. 426 , 66 L.Ed.2d 328 (1980). Lancaster also contends that the Board violated the doctrine of separation of government powers.

National Labor Relations Board v. Sir James, Inc.

446 F.2d 570 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 6, 1971

PER CURIAM: The Board’s order will be enforced. The early unilateral discontinuance of the health and welfare payments we conclude was an unfair labor practice. Hin-son v. N.L.R.B., 8 Cir., 428 F.2d 133 .

Winston v. Board of Prison Terms

264 F. App'x 604 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 18, 2008

Winston challenges the California Board of Prison Terms’ (“Board”) 1998 decision finding him unsuitable for parole. … See Sass v. Cal. Bd. of Prison Terms, 461 F.3d 1123, 1128-29 (9th Cir.2006).

Morrison-Knudsen, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

270 F.2d 864 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 10, 1959

See National Labor Relations Board v. Express Pub. Co., 1951, 312 U.S. 426, 435 , 61 S.Ct. 693 , 85 L.Ed. 930 ; see also National Labor Relations Board v. … O. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1958, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 359 , 262 F.2d 456 , 463.

National Labor Relations Board v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.

217 F.2d 366 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 28, 1954

This is the order which the Board petitions the Court to enforce. … Radio Officers’ Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union, AFL v. National Labor Relations, Board, 347 U.S. 17, 43 , 74 Sf.Ct. 323, 337, 98, L.Ed, 251. 2 . Associated Press v.

Arthur R. Grimm v. Harold Brown, Secretary of the Air Force

449 F.2d 654 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 30, 1971

Additionally, the district court ruled that the gravity of the security charge permeated the board’s consideration of the other charges to the point that “the Board’s findings were collective and finding No. 3 (the security … Immigration & Naturalization Service, 413 F.2d 286 (9th Cir. 1969), Meehan v. Macy, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 217 , 392 F.2d 822 (1968), or Bond v. Vance, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 203 , 327 F.2d 901 (1964).

National Labor Relations Board v. E.D.S. Service Corporation

466 F.2d 157 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 5, 1972

PER CURIAM: There is substantial evidence in the record, on this application by the Board for enforcement of its order against respondent company, to support the Board’s finding that respondent in discharging its employee … Allegheny Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. N. L. R. B., 312 F.2d 529, 531 (3rd Cir. 1962). See also United Aircraft Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 440 F.2d 85, 92 (2d Cir. 1971). This we will not do. The Board’s order will be enforced.

National Labor Relations Board v. Sky Wolf Sales, Etc.

470 F.2d 827 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 7, 1972

As the court noted in N.L.R.B. v. … Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 321 U.S. 678, 687 , 64 S.Ct. 830 [ 88 L.Ed. 1007 ].”

National Labor Relations Board v. Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd.

419 F.2d 216 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 19, 1969

Brown v. Sterling Aluminum Products Corp., 8 Cir., 1966, 365 F.2d 651, 656-657 . … The Board’s order is vacated, and the matter is remanded to the Board for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 1 . Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n v.