Case law

Thiem Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

489 F.2d 788 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 18, 1973

Cross Baking Co. v. NLRB, 453 F.2d 1346, 1349 (1st Cir. 1971). 8 . NLRB v. Maine Sugar Industry, Inc., 425 F.2d 942, 944-945 (1st Cir. 1970). 9 . NLRB v. … Collins & Aikman Corp. v. NLRB, 383 F.2d 722 -728 (4th Cir. 1967); NLRB v. Producers Cooperative Association, 457 F.2d 1121, 1126-1127 (10th Cir. 1972); NLRB v. Southern Foods, 434 F.2d 717 (5th Cir. 1970). 6 . NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Yutana Barge Lines, Inc.

315 F.2d 524 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 25, 1963

B. v. … “The Board’s findings are entitled to-respect,” [Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R.

Free-Flow Packaging Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

566 F.2d 1124 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 4, 1978

In NLRB v. Dorn’s Trans. … Accord, REA Trucking Co. v. NLRB, 439 F.2d 1065, 1066 (9th Cir. 1971); Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. NLRB, 407 F.2d 1357, 1361 (4th Cir. 1969); American Boiler Manufacturers Assoc. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Squire Shops, Inc.

559 F.2d 486 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 18, 1977

The key factual findings upon which the Board’s order rests are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole and will not be disturbed. Universal Camera Corp. v. … Moreover, Squire Shops insists that the Board’s bargaining order is not supported by findings made necessary by N.L. R.B. v. Gissell Packing Company, Inc., 395 U.S. 575 , 89 S.Ct. 1918 , 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969).

National Labor Relations Board v. Bakers of Paris, Inc.

929 F.2d 1427 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 8, 1991

In deciding whether to enforce the Board’s decision, we assess whether the Board’s evidentiary rulings were correct. See NLRB v. Maywood Do-nut Co., 659 F.2d 108, 110 (9th Cir.1981); Carpenter Sprinkler Corp. v. … NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Alaska S. S. Co.

211 F.2d 357 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 26, 1954

The Board’s determination that his name was dropped on that consideration alone is substantially supported by the evidence. … B. v. Pinkerton’s Nat. Detective Agency, 9 Cir., 202 F.2d 230, 231-232 . Cf. also Radio Officers’ Union of Commercial Telegraphers Union, A. F. L. v. N. L. R. B., 347 U.S. 17 , 74 S.Ct. 323 .

Anton Jungherr v. San Francisco U.S.D. Board of Education, and Myra Kopf, Former President of the Board

923 F.2d 743 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 17, 1991

Section 1983 , against the Board and Kopf, for acts performed pursuant to her authority as Board President. … In Calder v.

Jesus Escobar-Grijalva v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

206 F.3d 1331 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 20, 2000

See Lozada v. INS, 857 F.2d 10 (1st Cir.1988). Consequently, we address only the Board’s precedent. … Castro-O’Ryan v. U.S. Dept. of Immigration and Naturalization, 847 F.2d 1307, 1312 (9th Cir.1987).

National Labor Relations Board v. Big Three Industries, Inc.

602 F.2d 898 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 20, 1979

The Board is presumed to have certain expertise in this area and we will defer to the Board’s decisions unless it has committed an abuse of discretion. Pacific Southwest Airlines v. … The Board’s findings of fact are conclusive if supported by substantial evidence, e. g., Universal Camera v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Carpenters Union, Local 180

433 F.2d 934 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 22, 1970

Brown & Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 452 (8th Cir. 1963). … See, e. g., Snow v. N.L.R.B., 308 F.2d 687, 695 (9th Cir. 1962); Buncher v. N.L.R.B., supra., 405 F.2d at 789 ; N.L.R.B. v. Brown & Root, Inc., supra, 311 F.2d at 454 . Here no such evidence was presented.

Kit Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations Board

365 F.2d 829 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 10, 1966

PER CURIAM: Petitioner’s petition for review is denied for the reason that this court is of the opinion that the labor board’s determination that petitioner was guilty of an unfair labor practice (in the context of the facts

National Labor Relations Board v. General Electric Company

411 F.2d 750 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 7, 1969

We read the Board’s interpretation of the National Labor Relations Act more narrowly than does the respondent. … We think the Board’s interpretation and conclusions are reasonable. The petition for enforcement is therefore granted.

National Labor Relations Board v. Don Burgess Construction Corporation

596 F.2d 378 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 4, 1979

P 11,305 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, and Sequoia District Council of Carpenters, Intervenor, v. … We are not to overturn the Board's decision unless it is "arbitrary and capricious." See Packard Motor Car Co. v. NLRB, 330 U.S. 485, 491 , 67 S.Ct. 789 , 91 L.Ed. 1040 (1947); Victoria Station v.

Metlox Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations Board

378 F.2d 728 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 5, 1967

Curtiss-Wright Corp., Wright Aeronautical Div. v. NLRB, 347 F.2d 61, 68 (3d Cir. 1965). … The petition for review will be denied, and the Board’s order will be enforced. And see the Full Board’s summary of its holding in this case in White Furniture Co., 161 N.L.R.B.

National Labor Relations Board v. Red Spot Electric Co.

191 F.2d 697 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 20, 1951

Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Pittsburgh Steamship Co., 340 U.S. 498 , 71 S.Ct. 453 . … In National Labor Relations Board v.

National Labor Relations Board v. W. T. Grant Co.

199 F.2d 711 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 10, 1952

NLRB v. Bailey Co., 6 Cir., 180 F.2d 278 . … And as this court observed in NLRB v.

Peabody Coal Company v. National Labor Relations Board

709 F.2d 567 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 28, 1983

R.B. v. Southern California Edison Co., 646 F.2d 1352 , 1362 (9th Cir.1981); N.L.R.B. v. C.K. Smith & Co., 569 F.2d 162, 167 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 957 , 98 S.Ct. 3070 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1122 (1978). … If we were writing on a clean slate, we might be inclined to agree with the Board. However, in Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation v.

Lee v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

7 F. App'x 658 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 26, 2001

(“Board”). … See Allah v. Superior Court, 871 F.2d 887, 890-91 (9th Cir.1989). In addition, Lee’s claims against the Board are barred by the Eleventh Amendment. See Brooks v. Sulphur Springs Valley Elec.

National Labor Relations Board v. Greentree Electronics Corporation

432 F.2d 1011 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 12, 1970

The Board issued an opinion, reported at 176 N.L.R.B. No. 126 (June 23, 1969). The respondent argues that the Board’s order is not supported by substantial evidence. … The Board, on the other hand, points to opposing inferences. We are not persuaded that the inferences drawn by the Board were unreasonable or without substantial basis in fact.

Kershaw Sunnyside Ranches, Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board

252 F. App'x 786 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 25, 2007