Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca9

10,000+ results

2.83s

  • Lojas v. Washington

    347 F. App'x 288 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 14, 2009

    The § 1983 claim against Officer Ray-Smith in her personal capacity was properly dismissed by the district court on qualified immunity grounds. … Officer Ray-Smith’s conduct did not “violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known,” Wilson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tina Cates v. Bruce Stroud

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 25, 2020

    If a constitutional violation is established, satisfying the first prong, the second prong of a qualified immunity analysis asks whether the law prohibiting the action was “clearly established” at the time of the incident … Law is “clearly established” for the purposes of qualified immunity analysis if “every reasonable official would have understood that what he is CATES V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Herman Louis Dimartini v. Lynn Jay Ferrin, Special Agent, Federal Bureau of Investigation

    906 F.2d 465 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 25, 1990

    We therefore hold that to defeat a motion for qualified immunity where the government may have unreasonably interfered with one’s private employment, the employee does not need to demonstrate an entitlement to future employment … Ostrander, 879 F.2d 583, 591 (9th Cir.1989) (court must look to the legal lanscape at the time of the incident to determine whether a right is clearly established). 4 .

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • Chweya v. Baca

    130 F. App'x 865 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 5, 2005

    However, we reverse judgment as to Chweya’s malicious prosecution claim against Deputy Sheriffs Hoglund and Cabrera, and hold that the deputies are not entitled to qualified immunity against this claim. 1. … certainly “clearly established” that an officer may not fabricate a charge against a defendant.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Page v. Torrey

    26 F. App'x 675 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 28, 2001

    Because there is no clearly established law on grooming regulations for persons civilly committed to state hospitals, the district court properly dismissed Page’s claims against hospital officials, in their individual capacities … , on qualified immunity grounds.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pamella E. Settlegoode v. Portland Public Schools, Multnomah School District No.1 Susan Winthrop Robert Crebo Larry Whitson

    371 F.3d 503 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 9, 2004

    immunity test did not weigh clearly in Settlegoode’s favor. … Winthrop and Crebo were not entitled to qualified immunity from Settle-goode’s section 1983 claim.

    Cited 89 timesPublished
  • Farquhar v. Jones

    141 F. App'x 539 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 13, 2005

    Cain did not raise the issue of qualified immunity in his motion for summary judgment and we therefore lack jurisdiction to consider the district court’s determination that the parties’ evidence presents genuine issues of … Gregory, 363 F.3d 931, 932 (9th Cir.2004) (district court’s denial of summary judgment is not appealable unless the ground for the motion is qualified immunity).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • R. Moreno v. Baca

    400 F.3d 1152 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 7, 2005

    The court denied the deputies' motion for summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds, holding that Moreno's constitutional right to be free from suspicionless searches was "clearly established" at the time of the detention … In order to hold that Defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity, the court has to determine that Defendants violated a constitutional right that was "clearly established."

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Odom v. Kolender

    259 F. App'x 41 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 10, 2007

    Even if Odom could show defendant participated in a violation of his constitutional rights after he was placed in the general population of the jail, the district court properly concluded defendant was entitled to qualified … immunity because the law regarding placement of civil detainees within the jail was not clearly established at the time of the alleged violation.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ross v. City of Toppenish

    104 F. App'x 26 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 15, 2004

    immunity if it was not clearly established at the time of the officer’s conduct that such conduct would violate the Fourth Amendment. … That a police officer is not entitled to use such force against a handcuffed, secured and compliant citizen was clearly established “years before 1999[.]” Jones v. Buchanan, 325 F.3d 520, 534 (4th Cir.2003).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Coleen R. Roberts v. College of the Desert, C.A. Patterson, and Fern Stout

    870 F.2d 1411 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 15, 1989

    Qualified Immunity Immunity exists to shield government officials when their conduct does not violate *1417 clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known. Harlow v. … This finding is not clearly erroneous.

    Cited 125 timesPublished
  • Prison Legal News v. Cook

    238 F.3d 1145 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 7, 2001

    The Officials are entitled to qualified immunity if their conduct “does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” Harlow v. … We analyze qualified immunity claims using a two-step inquiry; we ask (1) whether the law governing the official’s conduct was clearly established at the time of the conduct; and, if so, (2) whether under that law a reasonable

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Wynter v. Wallis

    180 F. App'x 679 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 16, 2006

    Qualified Immunity Public officials have qualified immunity from civil liability “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known … These defendants therefore reasonably believed their conduct was lawful and are thus entitled to qualified immunity. AFFIRMED.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Porter v. Jones

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 6, 2007

    Finally, we hold that Jones is entitled to qualified immunity from damages because the constitutionality of halting vote swapping was not clearly established in 2000. … BOWEN ruled that Jones was entitled to qualified immunity because “the law regarding the constitutionality of prohibiting internet voteswapping is far from clearly established.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thunderbird v. Lampert

    74 F. App'x 835 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 16, 2003

    Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity on Thunderbird’s claim that prison officials violated his rights by not making a Native American translator available to him because prison officials had not violated any clearly … established constitutional right.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • California Department of Water Resources v. Powerex Corp.

    533 F.3d 1087 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 22, 2008

    BC Hydro’s treasurer declared: Powerex’s earnings are consolidated with those of BC Hydro for purposes of establishing BC Hydro’s rates.... … Powerex’s employment policies do not obviously qualify it or disqualify it as an “organ” of British Columbia.

    Cited 113 timesPublished
  • Clouthier v. County of Contra Costa

    591 F.3d 1232 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 14, 2010

    “The doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person … Further, the Clouthiers argue that Robert Clouthier’s rights in this context were clearly established, so the individual defendants were not entitled to summary judgment on the ground of qualified immunity.

    Overruled in part, on other grounds by Jonathon Castro v. County of Los Angeles, 833 F.3d 1060 (2016)Cited 480 timesPublished
  • Daniels v. County of Ventura

    228 F. App'x 669 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 5, 2007

    The facts, construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, illustrate that Camou violated Daniels’ clearly established Fourth Amendment rights. Deorle v. Rutherford, 272 F.3d 1272 , 1275 & n. 1 (9th Cir.2001). … Camou is thus not entitled to qualified immunity. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cooper v. Palmieri

    56 F.3d 70 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 19, 1995

    The Defendants moved for partial summary judgment against Cooper, asserting that they were entitled to qualified immunity against all Sec. 1983 claims. … Bagley: "1) Was the law governing the official's conduct clearly established? 2) Under that law, could a reasonable officer have believed the conduct was lawful?" 988 F.2d 868, 871 (9th Cir. 1993); see also Romero v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Boyer v. City of Santa Ana

    217 F. App'x 602 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 9, 2007

    Creighton, 483 U.S. 635, 641 , 107 S.Ct. 3034 , 97 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987), I dissent and would reverse the district court’s denial of judgment as a matter of law on the issue of qualified immunity. … Broad Fourth Amendment dictates do not clearly establish rights for the purposes of qualified immunity analysis; rather, “the legal rule in question must be defined in a more specific manner.” Alexander v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.