Case law

Ramada Inns, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

487 F.2d 1334 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 19, 1973

Ramada's attack is on the Board’s selection of an appropriate bargaining unit in an election conducted under § 9 of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 159 . Our decision in Westward-Ho Hotel Company v. … Westward-Ho Hotel Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra. The Board’s order is set aside. Enforcement is denied.

James A. Williams v. Pierce County Board of Commissioners

267 F.2d 866 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 22, 1959

Williams against the Pierce County, Washington, Board of Commissioners, the Pierce County Sheriff and two of his deputies. … See Williams v. United States, 9 Cir., 261 F.2d 224 ; Williams v. Coughlan, 9 Cir., 253 F.2d 284 ; Williams v. Heritage, 9 Cir., 250 F.2d 390 ; Williams v. Coughlan, 9 Cir., 244 F.2d 6 ; Williams v.

National Labor Relations Board v. California Date Growers Association

259 F.2d 587 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 29, 1958

Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v. N.L.R.B., supra; N.L.R.B. v. Potlatch Forests, supra; National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1, 45-46 , 57 S.Ct. 615 , 81 L.Ed. 893 . … May Department Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 326 U.S. 376 , 66 S.Ct. 203 , 90 L.Ed. 145 ; N.L.R.B. v. Geigy Co., Inc., 9 Cir., 211 F.2d 553 , certiorari denied 348 U.S. 821 , 75 S.Ct. 33 , 99 L.Ed. 647 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Waterfront Employees of Washington

211 F.2d 946 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 6, 1954

National Labor Relations Board v. Martin, 9 Cir., 207 F.2d 655 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Gaynor News Co., supra; Kansas Milling Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra. … See Cusano v. National Labor Relations Board, supra; National Labor Relations Board v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Grower-Shipper Vegetable Ass'n

122 F.2d 368 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 21, 1941

Labor Board v. Mackay Co., 304 U.S. 333 , 58 S.Ct. 904 , 82 L.Ed. 1381 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Lightner Pub. Corp., 7 Cir., 113 F.2d 621 . … Phelps Dodge Corporation v. Labor Board, supra.

Kershaw Sunnyside Ranches, Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board

252 F. App'x 786 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 25, 2007

American Distributing Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

715 F.2d 446 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 7, 1983

Id. at 1366-67; see also NLRB v. … See NLRB v. National Car Rental Systems, Inc., 672 F.2d 1182, 1188 (3d Cir.1982); NLRB v.

Loomis Courier Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

595 F.2d 491 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 18, 1979

. v. … Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965); Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). . The Board here found a § 8(a)(1) as well as a § 8(a)(3) violation.

National Labor Relations Board v. Four Winds Industries, Inc.

530 F.2d 75 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 26, 1976

There is a lack of substantial evidence to support the Board’s conclusion on this matter. As a result, we reverse the order of the Board requiring reinstatement and back pay of these two. V. … In N.L.R.B. v.

Alaska Department of Fish and Game v. Federal Subsistence Board

139 F.4th 773 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 2, 2025

Put another way, when the Board allows a subsistence hunt, but  STATE OF AK DEP’T OF FISH AND GAME V. FED. … Old Person v. Brown, 312 F.3d 1036, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002) (quotations omitted). However, we need not address this question today.

National Labor Relations Board v. American Potash & Chemical Corp.

118 F.2d 630 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 31, 1941

v. … In this we are in accord with the Board.

National Labor Relations Board v. Fleetwood Trailer Co., Inc.

366 F.2d 126 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 8, 1966

On the basis of the Board’s own policy as stated in Brown and Root, supra, we hold that whether or not a vacancy exists must be determined at the time the strikers apply for work after the strike. … Chauffeurs, Team. & H., etc. v, N.L.R.B., 233 F.2d 233 (7th Cir. 1956), the Board and court found that a striker’s job had been absorbed and he was thus not entitled to preferential reinstatement when a job opening occurred

Arizona Public Service Company v. National Labor Relations Board

453 F.2d 228 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 15, 1971

B. v. Swift and Co., 292 F.2d 561 (1st Cir. 1961). However, the Board’s finding of fact that the employees are not supervisors is subject to the scrutiny of judicial review. Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U. … B. v. Fullerton Publishing Co., 283 F.2d 545, 549 (9th Cir. 1960), quoting with approval Ohio Power Co. v. N. L. R. B., 176 F.2d 385, 387 (6th Cir. 1949).

National Labor Relations Board v. Giustina Bros. Lumber Co.

253 F.2d 371 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 1, 1958

See, e.g., Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 1951, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 ; Carpinteria Lemon Ass’n v. N. L. R. B., 9 Cir., 1957, 240 F.2d 554 ; N. L. R. B. v. … For other cases refusing to consider issues not raised or urged before the Board, see, e.g., Marshall Field & Co. v. N. L. R. B., 1943, 318 U.S. 253 , 63 S.Ct. 585 , 87 L.Ed. 744 ; N. L. R. B. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Joiners Of America, Local 1913

531 F.2d 424 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 12, 1976

NLRB v. Brown & Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963). The burden then shifts to the discriminating employer or union to prove circumstances which would limit its liability. NLRB v. Brown & Root, Inc., supra; NLRB v. … Agwilines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 87 F.2d 146, 151 (5th Cir. 1936).

Great Northern Railway Company v. National Labor Relations Board

272 F.2d 741 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 23, 1959

See footnote 2 in N.L.R.B. v. International Rice Milling Co., Inc., 341 U.S. 665 , at pages 668-669, 71 S.Ct. 961 at pages 962-963, 95 L.Ed. 1277 . 8 . Knapp v. … Union v. County of Door, 359 U.S. 354 , 79 S.Ct. 844 , 3 L.Ed.2d 872 . See, also, Douds v. Seafarers’ International Union, D.C.E.D.N.Y., 148 F.Supp. 953 . 10 .

Bryfogle v. Arizona Board of Regents

13 F. App'x 538 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 21, 2001

We review for abuse of discretion the district court’s decision to abstain under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 87 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971), see Martinez v. … Newport Beach City, 125 F.3d 777, 780 (9th Cir.1997), and we review de novo a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, see Hexom v. Oregon Dep’t of Transp., 171 F.3d 1134, 1135 (9th Cir.1999).

M & R Investment Co. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

308 F.2d 49 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 19, 1962

BROWNING, Circuit Judge. … In Las Vegas Hacienda, Inc. v. C. A.

National Labor Relations, Board v. Carroll-Naslund Disposal, Inc.

359 F.2d 779 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 11, 1966

It is settled law that the extent to which the Board chooses to exercise its statutory jurisdiction is a matter of administrative policy within the Board’s discretion, NLRB v. … Townsend, 185 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1950); and is not a question for the courts, NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Western Wirebound Box Co.

356 F.2d 88 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 19, 1966

B. v. … However, the Board has a right to change its view as long as its new position is not erroneous.