Case law

United States v. US Board of Water Comm'r

890 F.3d 1134 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 22, 2018

In 1990, the Decree court appointed the Board as a Special Master, thus authorizing the Board to make findings and recommendations as to pre- 1914 claims. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 53(b).  NEV. STATE ENG’R V. U.S. BD. … See, e.g., Prosole v. Steamboat Canal Co., 140 P. 720, 722 (Nev. 1914) (superseded by statute on other grounds); Strait v. Brown, 16 Nev. 317, 324 (1881); Lobdell v. Simpson, 2 Nev. 274, 279 42 NEV. STATE ENG’R V. U.S.

Pettis Ex Rel. U. S. v. Brown & Root, Inc

562 F.2d 55 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 12, 1977

S. v. Brown & Root, Inc. No. 75-2233 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 7/12/77 D.Idaho DISMISSED

National Labor Relations Board v. Mrs. Fay's Pies

341 F.2d 489 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 3, 1965

supports the Board’s findings. … (c) of the Board’s Order is a broad and ambiguous mandate and, under the authority of Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc. v. N. L. R.

Sonoco Products Company v. National Labor Relations Board

443 F.2d 1334 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 2, 1971

(Sonoco Products Company v. NLRB, 399 F.2d 835 (9th Cir. 1968)). … We decline to enforce the Board’s order to bargain and it is set aside, and the matter remanded to the Board. 1 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Haddock-Engineers, Ltd.

215 F.2d 734 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 21, 1954

The Board filed no reply brief, evidently realizing that in a Board proceeding the Company is not the agent of the Union with power to make admissions for the Union. Cf. N. L. R. B. v. … Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Laars Engineers, Inc.

332 F.2d 664 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 8, 1964

The letter as a whole does not justify the narrow and strained construction given to it by the Board. See Union Carbide Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 310 F.2d 844 (6th Cir.1962). … In National Labor Relations Board v. *668 International Longshoremen’s and Ware-housemen’s Union, Local 10, et al., 9 Cir., 283 F.2d 558 (1960), this court stated at page 568: “The Board cannot restrain practices which it

Diamond Walnut Growers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Diamond Walnut Growers, Inc.

53 F.3d 1085 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 18, 1995

We thus summarily affirm this part of the Board’s decision. See Sparks Nugget, Inc. v. NLRB, 968 F.2d 991 , 998 (9th Cir.1992). C. … Accord NLRB v. Int’l Union of Operating Eng’rs, 15 F.3d 677, 679 (7th Cir.1994). 1 See also Dash v.

Pioneer Inn Associates v. National Labor Relations Board

578 F.2d 835 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 19, 1978

Co. v. NLRB, 536 F.2d 1192, 1194 (7th Cir. 1976); Ingress-Plastene, Inc. v. NLRB, 430 F.2d 542, 547 (7th Cir. 1970). The Board has admitted as much in Sierra Development Co. d/b/a Club Cal-Neva, 231 NLRB No. 5 (1977). … We are bound to enforce the Board's decision if it is supported by substantial evidence viewing the record in its entirety. Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Mrs. Gladys Selvin

527 F.2d 1273 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 6, 1975

As the Supreme Court in NLRB v. … The Supreme Court in NLRB v. Express Pub.

National Labor Relations Board v. Winkel Motors, Inc.

443 F.2d 38 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 27, 1971

It is important to note that it is particularly within the purview of the Board to determine in cases such as this on conflicting evidence what the motivation for discharge was. United States Rubber Co. v. … Ed. 456 (1951); and all inferences drawn by the Board should not be replaced by our own, if the record supplies a reasonable basis to support those drawn by the Board, N.L.R.B. v.

Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education

605 F.2d 493 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 20, 1979

of Education v. … The principal holding in both cases was that the school boards had operated a dual system as of 1954, the date of Brown v.

Crystal Laundry Co. v. Brown-Meyer Co.

245 F. 662 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 4, 1917

This is a companion case with Broadway Towel Supply Co. v. Brown-Meyer Co., 245 Fed. 659 , — C. C. A. —, just decided. … The decrees are reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings, as in the case of Broadway Towel Supply Co. v. Brown-Meyer Co.

Zurn Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

680 F.2d 683 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 2, 1982

NLRB v. … Healthy Board of Education v. Doyle upon the NLRA, 66 Georgetown L.Rev. 1109,1123 n.69 (1978).

Allen v. Board of Pardons

792 F.2d 1404 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 26, 1986

Scott v. Illinois Parole and Pardon Board, 669 F.2d 1185 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1048 , 103 S.Ct. 468 , 74 L.Ed.2d 617 (1982). … In Winsett v.

Raley's, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

728 F.2d 1274 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 22, 1984

Since the en banc court overruled Anja Engineering Corp. v. … We reverse the unfair labor practice findings on the Board’s third charge, and affirm the unfair labor practice findings on the first, second and fourth charges. ENFORCEMENT GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

National Labor Relations Board v. Lee Office Equipment

572 F.2d 704 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 30, 1978

Thus, while we might agree that the Board’s Order might have been more artfully drafted, it is not within our province to disturb the Board’s Order on this basis. See Evergreen Helicopters, Inc. v. … The Supreme Court approved the Board’s “certification bar” as “within the allowable area of the Board’s discretion in carrying out congressional policy.” Brooks v.

Dash, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

683 F.2d 1229 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 10, 1982

Francisco Enterprises, Inc. v. … See California v. LaRue, 409 U.S. 109 , 93 S.Ct. 390 , 34 L.Ed.2d 342 (1972); Richter v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Lee Hotel Corporation

13 F.3d 1347 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 11, 1994

The Third Circuit enforced the Board’s Order in N.L.R.B. v. Louton, Inc., 822 F.2d 412 (3rd Cir.1987). … The Hotel relies on Southern Steamship Co. v. N.L.R.B., 316 U.S. 31 , 62 S.Ct. 886 , 86 L.Ed. 1246 (1942) and Sure-Tan v.

Alaska Industrial Board v. Chugach Electric Ass'n

245 F.2d 855 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 29, 1957

Libby, McNeill & Libby v. … Keehn v. Alaska Industrial Board, note 3, supra. Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Alaska Industrial Board and Lathourakis, supra.

State of Alaska v. Federal Subsistence Board

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 22, 2008

STATE OF ALASKA v. FEDERAL SUBSISTENCE BOARD 13441 any reservations. … STATE OF ALASKA v. FEDERAL SUBSISTENCE BOARD 13455 V.