Case law

Pay'n Save Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

641 F.2d 697 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 9, 1981

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: Pay’n Save Corporation, engaged in retailing goods to the public, petitions this court to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB); the NLRB eross-applies for enforcement … NLRB v. Essex Wire Corp., 245 F.2d 589, 593 (9th Cir. 1957). See Republic Aviation Corp. v. NLRB, 324 U.S. 793 , 65 S.Ct. 982 , 89 L.Ed. 1372 (1945).

National Labor Relations Board v. Tom Johnson, Inc.

378 F.2d 342 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 17, 1967

The Board, however, did not accept these findings. … Co. v. NLRB, 6 Cir., 1958, 252 F.2d 428 -431. This we have done.

Doug Hartley, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

669 F.2d 579 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 17, 1982

Kallman v. NLRB, 640 F.2d 1094 , 1098 & n.7 (9th Cir. 1981); NLRB v. Big Bear Supermarkets No. 3, 640 F.2d 924 , 928 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 919 , 101 S.Ct. 318 , 66 L.Ed.2d 147 (1980). … See L’Eggs Products, Inc. v. NLRB, 619 F.2d 1337 (9th Cir. 1980). The Board was persuaded by the selective rehiring that the employee’s poor performance was a pretext.

National Labor Relations Board v. Lozano Enterprises

356 F.2d 483 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 2, 1966

Opposition to the total back pay allotted by the order of the National Labor Relations Board is predicated upon four basic contentions: 1. … The order of the National Labor Relations Board should be and it is hereby affirmed. 1 . It was stipulated that $6,343.67 was the correct amount. 2 . 9 Cir., 318 F.2d 41 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Advanced Systems, Inc.

681 F.2d 570 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 23, 1982

The Board, however, enjoys wide discretion in conducting and supervising representation elections. Spring City Knitting Co. v. NLRB, 647 F.2d 1011, 1017 (9th Cir. 1981); NLRB v. … V We deny enforcement of the Board’s bargaining order and remand to the Board for an evidentiary hearing on the election objections.

National Labor Relations Board v. Howard Electric Company

873 F.2d 1287 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 3, 1989

Whisper Soft Mills, Inc. v. NLRB, 754 F.2d 1381 , 1384-85 (9th Cir.1985). We defer to the Board’s reasonable interpretation and application of the National Labor Relations Act. NLRB v. … NLRB v. City Disposal Systems, 465 U.S. 822, 832 , 104 S.Ct. 1505, 1511 , 79 L.Ed.2d 839 (1984).

Brown v. Bisignano

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 13, 2025

Nevertheless, the ALJ offered “specific, clear and convincing” reasons for rejecting Brown’s testimony regarding the degree of her limitations. Ferguson v. … Brown made statements that undermined her credibility, see Smolen v.

Northern Plains Resource Council, Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board

668 F.3d 1067 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 29, 2011

See LaFlamme v. … Conversely, the Board argues that the proj-  NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE v.

Butler-Johnson Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

608 F.2d 1303 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 20, 1979

Moreover, even when there is independent evidence to support the Board’s decision, the Board’s findings of fact will be scrutinized more critically if they contradict those of the ALJ. Loomis Courier Serv., Inc. v. … This court will defer to the Board in Section 2(11) decisions if the Board’s decision “has ‘warrant in the record’ and a reasonable basis in law.” NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Scientific Nutrition Corporation

180 F.2d 447 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 24, 1950

180 F.2d 447 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. SCIENTIFIC NUTRITION CORPORATION (INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, A.F.L., et al. (Intervenors). No. 11,694. … HEALY, Circuit Judge. 1 This case is in certain aspects a companion case to N.L.R.B. v. C. W. Hume Co., 9 Cir., 180 F.2d 445 , and N.L.R.B. v.

Hecla Mining Company v. National Labor Relations Board

564 F.2d 309 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 8, 1977

This court uniformly has made a close examination of the record to determine whether in fact the conclusions of the examiner and the Board are fairly supported by the record, e. g. NLRB v. Sauk Valley Manu. … In NLRB v.

State of California v. Federal Trade Commission

549 F.2d 1321 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 3, 1977

Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co., 415 U.S. 1 , 94 S.Ct. 1028 , 39 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974); Petroleum Exploration, Inc. v. … Brown immunity applies to FTC advertising proceedings but also that these plaintiffs automatically qualify for the immunity Parker v. Brown confers. 21 As was demonstrated by the Supreme Court in Cantor v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Register Pub. Co.

141 F.2d 156 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 28, 1944

National Labor Relations Board v. Sunshine Mining Co., supra; National Labor Relations Board v. Montgomery Ward & Co., supra; Art Metals Con *161 struction Co. v. … National Labor Relations Board, supra; National Labor Relations Board v. Highland Park Mfg. Co., supra; Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra; Wilson & Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Berryfast, Inc.

741 F.2d 1161 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 28, 1984

NLRB v. A.J. Tower Co., 329 U.S. at 330 , 67 S.Ct. at 327 ; Spring City Knitting Co. v. NLRB, 647 F.2d 1011, 1017 (9th Cir.1981). Hence, it is for the Board to determine whether Mrs. … Turner made a reasonable effort to avail herself of the opportunity to vote, and we will accept the Board’s determination if it is supported by substantial evidence. Presto Casting Co. v.

California Pacific Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. California Pacific Medical Center

87 F.3d 304 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 19, 1996

STANDARD OF REVIEW Courts of appeals may overturn Board decisions only if the Board’s findings of fact are not supported by substantial evidence, or if the Board has incorrectly applied the law. NLRB v. … See NLRB v. Action Automotive, Inc., 469 U.S. 490, 497 , 105 S.Ct. 984, 989 , 83 L.Ed.2d 986 (1984) (“We ... are not prepared to second-guess the Board’s” unit decisions); South Prairie Constr. Co. v.

Us Ecology, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Us Ecology, Inc.

772 F.2d 1478 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 3, 1985

In NLRB v. … See South Pacific Furniture, Inc. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 751, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Afl-Cio

285 F.2d 633 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 28, 1960

National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen’s and Warehouse-men’s Union, 9 Cir., 210 F.2d 581, 584 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … Local 135, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 7 Cir., 267 F.2d 870 ; Selby-Battersby & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 4 Cir., 259 F.2d 151 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

Schmidt v. Oakland Unified School District

662 F.2d 550 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 5, 1981

Schmidt & Pollard, and its partners individually, and Jot Brown, Inc. brought the present action against the School District, the School Board, and the seven individual members of the School Board. … See also North Carolina State Board of Education v.

Brown v. United States Department of Education

231 F. App'x 688 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 10, 2007

Brown also failed to file an adversary complaint or otherwise seek a ruling from the bankruptcy court that his student loans should be discharged because of undue hardship. See Tennessee Student Assistance Corp. v. … See United States v. Phillips, 20 F.3d 1005, 1007 (9th Cir.1994) (citing 20 U.S.C. § 1091a(a)).

Western Board of Adjusters, Inc. v. Clements

479 F.2d 45 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 27, 1973

See Suhl v. Bumb, 348 F.2d 869 (9th Cir. 1965). … Suhl v. Bumb, supra at 871 . Having concluded that this was not a proper case for the exercise of the referee’s summary jurisdiction, we need not reach Western’s other assignments of error.