Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Ayer Lar Sanitarium

436 F.2d 45 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 10, 1970

The findings of the Board must be upheld if supported by substantial evidence viewing the record as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Walton Mfg. Co., 369 U.S. 404, 405 , 82 S.Ct. 853 , 7 L.Ed.2d 829 (1962) (citing Universal Camera, 340 U.S. at 488 , 71 S.Ct. 456 ); N. L. R. B. v.

Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of Corrections, Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of Corrections

869 F.2d 461 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 3, 1989

Balla v. Idaho State Board of Corrections, 595 F.Supp. 1558 (D.Idaho 1984) (Balla I). … Balla v. Board of Corrections, 656 F.Supp. 1108 (D.Idaho 1987) (Balla II). On April 3, 1987, the Board filed a Rule 59 motion to alter or amend the judgment.

Capital Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

204 F.2d 848 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 12, 1953

B. v. … That the Board, has sometimes, in enforcement cases, overlooked the possibilities of § 8(b) (1) (A) is suggested by what was said in National Labor Relations Board v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Unbelievable, Inc.

71 F.3d 1434 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 1, 1995

DISCUSSION Standard of Review We will uphold decisions of the Board if its findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence and if it correctly applied the law. NLRB v. … Lends, Inc. v. NLRB, 587 F.2d 403, 408 (9th Cir.1978); NLRB v. Miller Brewing Co., 408 F.2d 12, 14 (9th Cir.1969).

Brown v. Bondi

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 30, 2025

A calculation error is not an extraordinary circumstance, and Brown has not exhibited the sort of diligence required to merit the relief of equitable tolling. See Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631, 649 (2010); Lona v. … I.N.S. v. Bagamasbad, 429 U.S. 24, 25 (1976). In Brown’s case, a decision on these additional issues would not change the outcome of his appeal. He suffered no prejudice. Flores-Rodriguez v.

Derish v. San Mateo-Burlingame Board of Realtors

724 F.2d 1347 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 23, 1983

Brown v. Federated Department Stores, Inc., 653 F.2d 1266, 1267 (9th Cir.), on remand from Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. … United States v. Real Estate Boards, 339 U.S. 485, 490-91 , 70 S.Ct. 711, 714-15 , 94 L.Ed. 1007 (1950); Marin County Board of Realtors, Inc. v. Palsson, 16 Cal.3d at 925 , 549 P.2d 833 , 130 Cal.Rptr. 1 .

MacDonald Miller Company v. National Labor Relations Board

856 F.2d 1423 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 12, 1988

As the Supreme Court said in United States v. … In Thompson v.

Claude H. Weaver v. Merit Systems Protection Board

669 F.2d 613 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 1, 1982

PER CURIAM: Weaver petitions for review of a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”) upholding his removal from a position as boiler plant operator at the Navy Public Works Center, Oakland, California. … Premachandra v. Mitts, 509 F.Supp. 424, 428 (E.D.Mo.1981); King v. Hampton, 412 F.Supp. 827, 829 (E.D.Va.1976), aff’d mem., 562 F.2d 46 (4th Cir. 1977); Schaefer v. United States, 633 F.2d 945, 948 (Ct.Cl.1980).

National Labor Relations Board v. Miller Redwood Company

407 F.2d 1366 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 25, 1969

As in NLRB v. Levinson’s Owl Rexall Drugs, Inc., 405 F.2d 494 (9 Cir. 1968), where the Board disagreed with the Examiner, we find substantial evidence to support the Board’s conclusions and order. … In NLRB v. Valley Die Cast Corp., 303 F.2d 64, 66 (6 Cir. 1962) the Board overruled the Examiner and refused reinstatement to an employee who with threats prevented maintenance men from entering a building. In NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Carlisle Lumber Co.

108 F.2d 188 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 4, 1939

The answer and the reference therein disclosed the details of such negotiations and showed that the account books of the Lumber Company have been submitted to experts employed by the Labor Relations Board and the Board has … -In order to be fully advised as to the financial and economic situation we grant the motion of the Board for the appointment of a master.

Herman Mohland v. National Labor Relations Board

394 F.2d 701 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 2, 1968

Petitioner was the charging party before the Board. … Goldberg v. Cockrell, 303 F.2d 811 , 812 n. 1 (C.A. 5).”

Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

194 F.2d 211 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 31, 1952

Rule 11 of the Board’s Rules of Practice 2 provides a 30-day period within which petitions may be filed for reconsideration of Board orders. … In United States v.

Pacific Maritime Association v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 20, 2026

court vacated the Board’s order because it was bound by our decision in International Longshore & Warehouse Union v. … See Small v.

Brown v. Miller

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 19, 2026

See Whren v. … Padgett v.

Newspaper and Periodical Drivers & Helpers Union, Local No. 921, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, Douglas Brown v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. San Francisco Newspaper Printing Company, Inc.

509 F.2d 99 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 23, 1974

Douglas BROWN et al., Cross-Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SAN FRANCISCO NEWSPAPER PRINTING COMPANY, INC., Respondent. … The supplemental decision and order followed our remand of an earlier Board decision and order. Brown v. N.L.R.B., 462 F.2d 699 (CA9 1972).

National Labor Relations Board v. Citizen-News Co.

134 F.2d 970 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 16, 1943

the case of National Labor Relations Board v. … This is manifest by a consideration of the evidence on the subject of bylines shown in the margin. 2 Under the heading “V.

National Labor Relations Board v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.

189 F.2d 82 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 6, 1951

Cf., Republic Steel Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 3 Cir. 1940, 114 F.2d 820 . … The Board cites Republic Steel Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra; Polish National Alliance v. National Labor Relations Board, 7 Cir. 1943, 136 F.2d 175 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Star Pub.

Kin v. Holder

595 F.3d 1050 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 18, 2010

They petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) final order affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) adverse credibility finding as to each of them and denying their appeal. … Petitioners compare their case to Smolniakova v.

Khosrow Gharib Rashtabadi v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

23 F.3d 1562 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 11, 1994

FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge: Khosrow Rashtabadi, a citizen of Iran, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ affirmance of an immigration judge’s decision which found him deportable under 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (a) … See Castillo v.

Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

196 F.2d 933 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 19, 1952

This vague reference to the Constitution is totally inadequate to put the due process issue in the' case before the Board; and the Board quite properly did not rule *937 on the point. … The order of the Board is affirmed.