Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.40s
Donald Eugene Brown v. United States
514 F.2d 141 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 9, 1975
United States, 396 F.2d 345 (9th Cir. 1968), and Halliday v. … Accordingly, the rule of Long (as interpreted in Munich v. United States, 337 F.2d 356 (9th Cir. 1964)) controls the disposition of Brown’s appeal.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKindt v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board
67 F.3d 266 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 10, 1995
Brown Act, Cal.Gov’t Code §§ 54950-54961 (governing the conduct of public commission, board, and council meetings). . We say cohort because from the record it is apparent that Kindt and the other person, Chester A. … Neither one dealt with speech at a public board meeting. Grayned v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedYoung v. California State Board of Pharmacy
273 F. 30 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 9, 1921
In Spreckels v. … In Anderson v. Watt, 138 U. S. 694 -701, 11 Sup. Ct. 449, 450 ( 34 L.
Cited 4 timesPublishedRaley's, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
703 F.2d 410 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 7, 1983
The Board had no reason in the Styletek case to analyze the announcement and the conferral of benefits separately. Similarly, J.P. Stevens & Co. v. … NLRB v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedAlaska Industrial Board v. Alaska Packers Ass'n
186 F.2d 1015 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 31, 1951
Peterson and the Alaska Industrial Board, hereafter called the Board, appeal from a judgment of the District Court for the Territory of Alaska holding that the Board is without jurisdiction to award Peterson disability compensation … and enjoining the Board from attempting to enforce it.
Cited 4 timesPublishedSpangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education
611 F.2d 1239 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 6, 1979
Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education, 519 F.2d 430 (9th Cir. 1975), rev’d on other grounds, Pasadena City Board of Education v. Spangler, 427 U.S. 424 , 96 S.Ct. 2697 , 49 L.Ed.2d 599 (1976). … The Board is the named appellant in Nos. 77-2902 and 77-2941; certain individual Board members appeal in No. 78-2266. For convenience, all appellants are referred to herein as “the Board”. . Chapters of the Spangler v.
Cited 8 timesPublished147 F.3d 1048 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 22, 1998
NLRB v. Downslope Indus., Inc., 676 F.2d 1114, 1116 (6th Cir.1982); see also Rockwell Int’l Corp. v. … See NLRB v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedHorace BROWN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL CAN COMPANY, Defendant/ Appellee
765 F.2d 810 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 8, 1985
As this circuit stated in Rice v. … V The district court’s dismissal of Brown’s Title VII complaint as untimely is REVERSED and the case REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
Cited 42 timesPublishedUnited States v. James Edward Brown
488 F.2d 73 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 28, 1973
See United States v. Brown, 475 F.2d 91 (9th Cir. 1973). The sole remaining issue is the legality of Brown’s arrest. … Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89, 91 , 85 S.Ct. 223, 225 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964).” United States v. McDowell, 475 F.2d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 1973). Affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Amalgamated Lithographers
309 F.2d 31 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 31, 1962
Brown v. Local No. 17, Amalgamated Lithographers, D.C., 180 F.Supp. 294 . . “Section 22. … In Brown v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedThompson v. National Mediation Board
44 F. App'x 849 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 19, 2002
Co. v. Pan Ocean Shipping Co. Ltd., 23 F.3d 1498,1501 (9th Cir.1994). … See Jones v. Aero/ Chem Corp., 921 F.2d 875, 878 (9th Cir. 1990) (per curiam).
Cited 0 timesPublished603 F.3d 658 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 29, 2010
Brown v. Palmateer, 379 F.3d 1089, 1093 (9th Cir. 2004) (internal quo- tation marks, citations and alterations omitted). … In Brown, importantly, we gave less defer- ence to the state court’s denial of Brown’s habeas petition, because the state courts had “provided no ratio decidendi to review.” Brown, 379 F.3d at 1092, citing Delgado v.
Cited 90 timesPublishedDHL Corp. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
659 F.2d 941 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 19, 1981
Moss v. … This was not a ground relied *948 upon in the Board’s decision and we therefore will not accept it. See Nat’l Air Carrier Ass’n v. C.A.B., 436 F.2d 185 , 195 (D.C.Cir.1970); Trailways of New England v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Hartman
774 F.2d 1376 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 24, 1985
Detroit Edison Co. v. … Absent some explanation for doing so, the Board cannot impose different remedies in similar situations. See National Treasury Employees Union v.
Cited 1 timesPublished446 F.2d 1232 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 23, 1971
This is an application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (Board), 182 NLRB 57 . … Universal Camera Corporation v. N.L.R.B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).
Cited 2 timesPublishedSalustia Cortez-Felipe v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
245 F.3d 1054 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 2, 2001
Petitioner appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) arguing that she should have been charged as deportable, not removable. On April 6, 1999, the BIA dismissed Petitioner’s appeal. … Barahona-Gomez v. Reno, 236 F.3d 1115, 1119-20 (9th Cir.2001); Lopez-Telles v.
Cited 59 timesPublishedBeauchamp & Brown Groves Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
371 F.2d 942 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 19, 1967
Petitioner’s reliance on our decision in Commissioner v. South Lake Farms, Inc., 324 F.2d 837 (9th Cir. 1963), is unwarranted. … And see Watson v. Commissioner, 345 U.S. 544 , 73 S.Ct. 848 , 97 L.Ed. 1232 (1953). The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed. 1 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedIsenhart v. Railroad Retirement Board
57 F. App'x 775 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 14, 2003
Isenhart petitions pro se for review of the Railroad Retirement Board’s (“RRB”) decision affirming the hearing officer’s decision that his railroad retirement annuity was properly adjusted to offset his social security benefit … Estes v. R.R. Ret. Bd., 776 F.2d 1436, 1437 (9th Cir.1985) (citation omitted).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Joseph Wiley Brown
456 F.2d 687 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 10, 1972
PER CURIAM: After conviction and sentence in this firearms case, United States v. Bass, 404 U.S. 336 , 92 S.Ct. 515 , 30 L.Ed.2d 488 (1971) was decided.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPacific Maritime Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board
827 F.3d 1203 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 8, 2016
All Board decisions made during this period are thus invalid under New Process Steel, L.P. v. … Locals v.
Cited 10 timesPublished
Ask Donna