Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,632 results
0.86s
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 3, 2023
Applying the standard four- part test for preliminary injunctions established in Winter v. … That rule re- quires an injunction to indicate clearly what is forbidden or mandated—a rule necessitated by the fact that injunctions are enforceable by contempt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFederal Firearms Licensees of Illinois v. Jay R. Pritzker
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 3, 2023
Applying the standard four- part test for preliminary injunctions established in Winter v. … That rule re- quires an injunction to indicate clearly what is forbidden or mandated—a rule necessitated by the fact that injunctions are enforceable by contempt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 3, 2023
Applying the standard four- part test for preliminary injunctions established in Winter v. … That rule re- quires an injunction to indicate clearly what is forbidden or mandated—a rule necessitated by the fact that injunctions are enforceable by contempt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJeremy Langley v. Brendan Kelly
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 3, 2023
Applying the standard four- part test for preliminary injunctions established in Winter v. … That rule re- quires an injunction to indicate clearly what is forbidden or mandated—a rule necessitated by the fact that injunctions are enforceable by contempt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 3, 2023
Applying the standard four- part test for preliminary injunctions established in Winter v. … That rule re- quires an injunction to indicate clearly what is forbidden or mandated—a rule necessitated by the fact that injunctions are enforceable by contempt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 3, 2023
Applying the standard four- part test for preliminary injunctions established in Winter v. … That rule re- quires an injunction to indicate clearly what is forbidden or mandated—a rule necessitated by the fact that injunctions are enforceable by contempt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 3, 2023
Applying the standard four- part test for preliminary injunctions established in Winter v. … That rule re- quires an injunction to indicate clearly what is forbidden or mandated—a rule necessitated by the fact that injunctions are enforceable by contempt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFederal Firearms Licensees of Illinois v. Jay R. Pritzker
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 3, 2023
Applying the standard four- part test for preliminary injunctions established in Winter v. … That rule re- quires an injunction to indicate clearly what is forbidden or mandated—a rule necessitated by the fact that injunctions are enforceable by contempt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 3, 2023
Applying the standard four- part test for preliminary injunctions established in Winter v. … That rule re- quires an injunction to indicate clearly what is forbidden or mandated—a rule necessitated by the fact that injunctions are enforceable by contempt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRobert Bevis v. City of Naperville
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 3, 2023
Applying the standard four- part test for preliminary injunctions established in Winter v. … That rule re- quires an injunction to indicate clearly what is forbidden or mandated—a rule necessitated by the fact that injunctions are enforceable by contempt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJeremy Langley v. Brendan Kelly
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 3, 2023
Applying the standard four- part test for preliminary injunctions established in Winter v. … That rule re- quires an injunction to indicate clearly what is forbidden or mandated—a rule necessitated by the fact that injunctions are enforceable by contempt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRobert Bevis v. City of Naperville
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 3, 2023
Applying the standard four- part test for preliminary injunctions established in Winter v. … That rule re- quires an injunction to indicate clearly what is forbidden or mandated—a rule necessitated by the fact that injunctions are enforceable by contempt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Scott Carnell
972 F.3d 932 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 28, 2020
But we cannot rely on the expertise of a drug user, dealer, or law enforcement officer alone to determine that methamphetamine is more than 80% pure as opposed to 79% pure, and the Guidelines clearly require a more exacting … Castenada, 906 F.3d 691 (2018), fails to provide a clear precedent for establishing the government’s burden to demonstrate the identity of ice. Id. at 694.
Cited 17 timesPublished145 Fisk, LLC v. F. William Nicklas
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 26, 2021
By its own terms, the Resolution did not bind or 16 No. 20-1868 otherwise “substantively limit[]” the City “by mandating a particular result when certain clearly stated criteria … We find similarly unavailing Fisk’s remaining argument that the underlying contract for the building and the rezoning decision established cognizable constitutional property inter- ests.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWrinkles, Matthew E. v. Levenhagen, Mark
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 12, 2008
Likewise, the Indiana Supreme Court’s legal conclusions will be upheld unless they resulted in a decision that was “(1) contrary to, or involved an unreasonable applica- tion of, clearly established federal law, as determined … established law.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRenetrice Pierre v. Midland Credit Management
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Apr 1, 2022
Spokeo and TransUnion established that a bare statutory vi- olation is not necessarily enough to support standing. … established law); Williams v.
Cited 0 timesPublished145 Fisk, LLC v. F. William Nicklas
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 26, 2021
By its own terms, the Resolution did not bind or 16 No. 20-1868 otherwise “substantively limit[]” the City “by mandating a particular result when certain clearly stated criteria … We find similarly unavailing Fisk’s remaining argument that the underlying contract for the building and the rezoning decision established cognizable constitutional property inter- ests.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Yahtzee Harris
51 F.4th 705 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Oct 14, 2022
On appeal, Walton first argues that the district court erred when it concluded that his prior Indiana convictions qualified as “controlled substance offenses,” thus subjecting him to the career-offender provision of U.S.S.G … Harris argues that the district judge clearly meant to ex- tend the supervision period on only Count 1 because (1) the judge said he “hate[s]” lengthy supervision periods; and (2) the judge reluctantly increased the length
Cited 13 timesPublished195 F.3d 857 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Oct 26, 1999
Unelaborated avowals do not demonstrate that a finding of fact reached after a trial is clearly erroneous. … And now we can see more clearly one of the fallacies in the "precautionary" injunction gimmick.
Cited 3 timesPublished116 F.2d 690 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Dec 13, 1940
The action of the trial court upon an application for a continuance is purely a matter of discretion, and not subject to review unless it be clearly shown that such discretion has been abused. … selected by said league had attended jury classes maintained for the purpose of giving instructions to potential jurors; that lectures before the jury classes presented the views of the prosecution; and that females otherwise qualified
Modified on other grounds by Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60 (1942)Cited 46 timesPublished
Ask Donna