Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,632 results
0.81s
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 3, 2023
Applying the standard four- part test for preliminary injunctions established in Winter v. … That rule re- quires an injunction to indicate clearly what is forbidden or mandated—a rule necessitated by the fact that injunctions are enforceable by contempt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard Of Trade Of The City Of Chicago v. Securities And Exchange Commission
677 F.2d 1137 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 27, 1982
Although it is a close and difficult issue, I do not intend by this concurring opinion to qualify in any way my adherence to it. … As a result, the plan was modified to qualify it as an options program under the Federal securities laws.
Vacated by Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. v. Board of Trade, 459 U.S. 1026 (1982)Cited 18 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 3, 2023
Applying the standard four- part test for preliminary injunctions established in Winter v. … That rule re- quires an injunction to indicate clearly what is forbidden or mandated—a rule necessitated by the fact that injunctions are enforceable by contempt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJeremy Langley v. Brendan Kelly
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 3, 2023
Applying the standard four- part test for preliminary injunctions established in Winter v. … That rule re- quires an injunction to indicate clearly what is forbidden or mandated—a rule necessitated by the fact that injunctions are enforceable by contempt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRobert Bevis v. City of Naperville
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 3, 2023
Applying the standard four- part test for preliminary injunctions established in Winter v. … That rule re- quires an injunction to indicate clearly what is forbidden or mandated—a rule necessitated by the fact that injunctions are enforceable by contempt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Polichemi, Joseph
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 5, 2000
After sixteen potential jurors had been qualified, the judge would call for simultaneously submitted peremptory challenges and then empanel those who were not struck. Jury selection began on May 15, 1996. … While the term "implied bias" is not one that is used often, the concept is nonetheless well established in the law.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMichael Gilbreath v. Dan Winkleski
21 F.4th 965 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Dec 30, 2021
Gilbreath failed to demonstrate that the state court’s rejection of a claim of deficient performance was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, or was based on an unreasonable … We cannot conclude in the end that the state court’s ruling on prejudice was the result of an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law, or was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts.
Cited 25 timesPublished629 F.2d 467 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 7, 1980
his power of appointment, ACT asserts, the President is effectively legislating a different size Commission than the eleven member Commission prescribed by Congress. 10 39 It is clear that the President is not completely immune … Extension Pensacola, Fla., supra, in which the Commission did discuss and find material harm to existing carriers, it was clearly the protestants who made the showing and not the applicant who failed to show the reverse.
Cited 0 timesPublished875 F.2d 584 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 16, 1989
Sec. 1117 (b) would have been established. More on this point later. 11 The judge also had no justification for berating Vuitton for seeking monetary relief rather than resting content with an injunction. … That clearly is the case here with regard to the untrebled component of the relief sought.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeoria Union Stock Yards Co. Retirement Plan v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance
698 F.2d 320 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 20, 1983
Rule 10b-5 tracks section 17(a) closely, and the right to bring a private damage action for violations of Rule 10b-5 is well established, whatever one may think of this right as an original matter, see Trecker v. … We do not think it necessary to consider whether the plan or its participants have standing to prosecute the common law claims, since the trustees clearly do.
Cited 20 timesPublishedMcCoy, Thomas v. Maytag Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 30, 2007
McCoy’s brief does not clearly articulate upon which of the three exceptions he relies, although it appears that he is asserting the first exception because he argues that the union did not fairly represent him by declining … have been futile for him to file a grievance because both Maytag and union representative Jones misinterpreted the CBA as requiring him to file a medical update every thirty days, despite the fact that his injury did not qualify
Cited 0 timesPublished259 F.2d 215 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 18, 1958
From an affidavit 5 in this record it is clearly established that Halligan suffered a physical breakdown in May, 1948 “and has not worked since that date; that his condition has been diagnosed as multiple sclerosis.” … “Section 1 * * * No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due
Cited 22 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 24, 2016
had adapted successfully to Mexico, and that finding is not clearly erroneous. … See Walker, 701 F.3d at 1121 (not‐ ing that “any sort of regular contact” with the child qualifies as “exercising … custody rights” under the Convention).
Cited 0 timesPublished195 F.3d 857 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Oct 26, 1999
Unelaborated avowals do not demonstrate that a finding of fact reached after a trial is clearly erroneous. … And now we can see more clearly one of the fallacies in the "precautionary" injunction gimmick.
Cited 3 timesPublished220 F.2d 495 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 15, 1955
It is essential at the beginning that we establish Darrow’s status. As related, he was reorganization trustee for both estates for a number of years. … We think his petition was clearly within the jurisdiction of the District Court and that he should have had a hearing upon the merits.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 3, 2023
Applying the standard four- part test for preliminary injunctions established in Winter v. … That rule re- quires an injunction to indicate clearly what is forbidden or mandated—a rule necessitated by the fact that injunctions are enforceable by contempt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRobert Bevis v. City of Naperville
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 3, 2023
Applying the standard four- part test for preliminary injunctions established in Winter v. … That rule re- quires an injunction to indicate clearly what is forbidden or mandated—a rule necessitated by the fact that injunctions are enforceable by contempt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJeremy Langley v. Brendan Kelly
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 3, 2023
Applying the standard four- part test for preliminary injunctions established in Winter v. … That rule re- quires an injunction to indicate clearly what is forbidden or mandated—a rule necessitated by the fact that injunctions are enforceable by contempt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRobert Bevis v. City of Naperville
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 3, 2023
Applying the standard four- part test for preliminary injunctions established in Winter v. … That rule re- quires an injunction to indicate clearly what is forbidden or mandated—a rule necessitated by the fact that injunctions are enforceable by contempt.
Cited 0 timesPublished145 Fisk, LLC v. F. William Nicklas
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 26, 2021
By its own terms, the Resolution did not bind or 16 No. 20-1868 otherwise “substantively limit[]” the City “by mandating a particular result when certain clearly stated criteria … We find similarly unavailing Fisk’s remaining argument that the underlying contract for the building and the rezoning decision established cognizable constitutional property inter- ests.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna