Case law

Scott Dahlstrom v. Sun-Times Media, LLC

777 F.3d 937 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Feb 6, 2015

Superior Court, 478 U.S. 1, 10 (1986) (extending to preliminary hear- ings the qualified First Amendment right of access to crimi- nal trials acknowledged in Globe). Yet in Globe Newspaper Co. v. … But Desnick’s ruling ap- plies only insofar as “no established rights are invaded in the process.” Id.

Central States Areas v. Pioneer Ranch Limite

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 12, 2007

In 1993, the Whitings established the Pioneer Ranch Limited Partnership. … Additionally, “a sporadic activity, a hobby, or an amusement diversion does not qualify.” Groetzinger, 480 U.S. at 35.

Northwest Engineering Corp. v. Keystone Driller Co.

70 F.2d 13 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 29, 1934

The evidence, however, rather clearly established the use of a drop bottom scoop. There is a basis for the rejection of the testimony of one witness, a Mr. … Nor can novelty, surely not pat *19 entable novelty, reside in the qualifying words, “Said bottom having earth' entering teeth at the pivotal end.”

United States v. Aga Khan

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 16, 2020

False documentation was then prepared to make it appear as though these individuals had the requisite where- withal to qualify for the loans. … Ghuman has denied many of these actions, and given the evidence before the district court, Judge Tharp did not clearly err in treating these as false denials.

Audrey Goodwin v. The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois and Randy Kornegay and Kip Mecum, in Their Individual Capacities

442 F.3d 611 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 31, 2006

McDonnell Douglas analysis In order to indirectly establish proof of discrimination in her Title VII claim, Goodwin must first establish the prima facie elements set out in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. … As we stated in Ezell , “the other employees must have engaged in similar—not identical—conduct to qualify as similarly situated.” Ezell, 400 F.3d at 1050 .

Tinsley v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

635 F.2d 1288 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Dec 12, 1980

Local 710’s internal union remedies are both mandatory 2 and, by virtue of well-established, and controlling, authority are adequate. … Constitution, Article XIX, Section 9, establishes that fines may be assessed against individuals or against the Union itself.

Cavel Int'l Inc v. Matekaitis, Ron

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 21, 2007

But in the case of the severance tax the “local” character of the 8 No. 07-2658 activity taxed, although it does not immunize the tax from scrutiny, Commonwealth Edison Co … “Where the statute regulates even- handedly to effectuate a legitimate local public interest, and its effects on interstate commerce are only incidental, it will be upheld unless the burden imposed on such commerce is clearly

Mohsin Yafai v. Mike Pompeo

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 23, 2019

It is also important to clearly reject any implication that the panel’s opinion in Yafai v. Pompeo endorses a system in which the executive branch is free to deny visa applications on the basis of bias or whim. … The provisions of § 1182(a)(3)(B) establish specific criteria for determining terrorism‐ related inadmissibility.

Charles W. Leigh and Ervin F. Dusek, Etc., and George Johnson, Intervening v. Clyde William Engle

727 F.2d 113 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 20, 1984

Throughout the long period during which the Engle group established its position in Hickory, the trust held its shares. … Our holding in this case does not establish a per se rule based on potential conflicts of interest.

Retired Chicago Police Association v. City Of Chicago

76 F.3d 856 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Apr 4, 1996

The plaintiff bears the burden of establishing that it meets the required elements of standing. Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 561 , 112 S.Ct. 2130, 2136 , 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992). … A litigant may request that the district judge reconsider the order, but the district judge may only do so where the order is shown to be "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Id.

Shango v. Jurich

681 F.2d 1091 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 10, 1982

The district court, however, explicitly held that plaintiff had not established a reasonable likelihood of success on those claims. 38 The issuance of the injunctions on equal protection grounds thus clearly constituted an … The motion is now moot 12 Under some circumstances, however, a state created interest may be viewed as being qualified by limited procedural protections. See Arnett v.

United States v. James J. Hawver

437 F.2d 850 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 26, 1971

The opinion in McCoy lays some stress on the fact that the registrant, who was a vacation pioneer, was failing to spend enough time in his ministerial efforts to qualify as a pioneer. … In other decisions upholding denial of the IV-D classification to a Jehovah’s Witness who was not a regular pioneer minister, courts have clearly avoided deciding that such a registrant could properly be denied the classification

United States v. Gonzalez, Luis

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Feb 6, 2003

This argument must fail because no one other than Perez can establish standing to assert Perez’s constitutional rights. See United States v. Jackson, 189 F.3d 502, 507-08 (7th Cir. 1999). … A defense lawyer’s failure to inspect the evidence that has been admitted does not qualify as a government “suppression.” d.

Melson, Adrian v. Bayer Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 4, 2007

Its seriousness could not be overstated: AIDS ravaged the immune systems of its victims and seemed to be inevitably fatal. … Piper Aircraft establishes that the law in the United Kingdom need not be identical to U.S. law, or even as favorable to plaintiffs as U.S. law may be.

United States v. Royel Page

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Dec 18, 2024

It also provided other instructions on when a defendant qualifies—and does not qualify—as a member of a conspiracy. … This means sometimes, even where the evidence clearly establishes knowledge, it still falls short of proving intent. Id. Direct Sales took pains to distinguish the analysis of knowledge from that of intent.

United States v. Blanchard, Marshall

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 8, 2008

That clearly opened the door for [the prosecutor] to read into the record the Court’s comments from November 15th because that was clearly the first time Marshall Blanchard was confronted with what this Court … Such comments violate Rule 605 by “add[ing] new evidence which the prosecution was otherwise unable to establish.”

Martino v. Western & Southern Financial Group

715 F.3d 195 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Apr 25, 2013

Under the indirect method, a plaintiff establishes a prima facie case of discrimination by offering evidence that: “(1) he is a member of a protected class; (2) he was qualified for the applicable positions; (3) he suffered … This is highly unlikely, given the fact that W & S attached the termination letter, which clearly stated the reason for Martino’s discharge.

New Burnham Prairie Homes, Incorporated v. Village Of Burnham

910 F.2d 1474 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 21, 1990

Co., 826 F.2d 477 (7th Cir.1986), we stated that "[t]he multiple predicate acts alleged in the complaint all clearly relate to the same transaction ..., involved a single victim, inflicted a single injury, and occurred within … Accordingly, the plaintiffs must establish two elements: that "the conduct complained of was committed by a person acting under color of state law"; and that "this conduct deprived a person of rights, privileges, or immunities

Mark A. Ramsden, Raelynn Ramsden, and Milton R. Ramsden, Individually and D/B/A Ramsden Dairy v. Agribank, Fcb

214 F.3d 865 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 30, 2000

When a federal court is asked to enjoin state court proceedings, the mere fact that the case falls within one of § 2283’s exceptions does not “qualify in any way the principles of equity, comity, and federalism that must … Under those circumstances, the Second Circuit did not need to confront the scenario before us, where the state court had not reached final judgment but had clearly adjudicated and expressly rejected the merits of the res

Raul Salazar-Garcia v. Emely Galvan-Pinelo

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Dec 22, 2015

During the second hearing, D.S. more clearly ob- jected to returning to Mexico. … If they do not live together, what is established by articles 380 and 381 will apply to grant custody of the child.